The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Memories of colonoscopy: a randomized trial
Open accessAbstract
Patients' memories of the past may influence their decisions about the future, yet memories are imperfect and susceptible to bias. We tested whether a memory failure observed in psychology experiments could be applied in a clinical setting to lessen patients' memories of the pain of an unpleasant medical procedure. We studied consecutive outpatients undergoing colonoscopy who were medically stable, mentally competent, and able to speak English (n=682). By random assignment, half the patients had a short interval added to the end of their procedure during which the tip of the colonoscope remained in the rectum. Pain during the procedure was measured with a ten point intensity scale. Memory following the procedure was measured using both a rating scale and a ranking task. Randomization resulted in two similar groups. As theorized, patients who underwent the extended procedure experienced the final moments as less painful (1.7 vs. 2.5 on a ten point intensity scale, P<0.001), rated the entire experience as less unpleasant (4.4 vs. 4.9 on a 10 cm visual analogue scale, P=0.006), and ranked the procedure as less aversive compared to seven other unpleasant experiences (4.1 vs. 4.6 with eight as the worst, P=0.002). Rates of returning for a repeat colonoscopy (median duration of follow-up 5.3 years) averaged 50.4% and were slightly higher (odds ratio=1.41, P=0.038) for those who underwent the longer procedure controlling for prior colonoscopy, procedure indications, and abnormal findings. Memory failures observed in experimental conditions can be found in clinical settings involving awake patients and may offer opportunities for improving patients' willingness to undergo future unpleasant medical procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.4.341 · Cited by 6,544
Self-citationWhen More Pain Is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End
Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A., & Redelmeier, D. A. (1993) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00589.x · Cited by 1,502
Self-citationDuration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.45 · Cited by 1,228
Self-citationRedelmeier, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(96)02994-6 · Cited by 1,078
Self-citationKatz, J., & Melzack, R. (1999) · Surgical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70381-9 · Cited by 723
Self-citationSex, gender, and pain: women and men really are different
Fillingim, R. B. (2000) · Current Review of Pain · doi:10.1007/s11916-000-0006-6 · Cited by 488
A valid procedure for obtaining self-report of affect in marital interaction.
Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1985) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.53.2.151 · Cited by 281
Stone, A. A., Broderick, J. E., Kaell, A. T., DelesPaul, P. A. E. G., & Porter, L. E. (2000) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1054/jpai.2000.7568 · Cited by 133
Cited by
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.9.697 · Cited by 5,540
Self-citationMaps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803322655392 · Cited by 5,377
Self-citationRepresentativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476
Self-citationSlovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.025 · Cited by 2,349
Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems.
Walton, G. M., & Wilson, T. D. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000115 · Cited by 617
Anomalies: Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility
Kahneman, D., & Thaler, R. H. (2005) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.870494 · Cited by 639
Self-citationA computational and neural model of momentary subjective well-being
Rutledge, R. B., Skandali, N., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1407535111 · Cited by 444
Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Shiffman, S. S. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167205275615 · Cited by 206
Dynamic Influences on Smoking Relapse Process
Shiffman, S. (2005) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2005.00364.x · Cited by 191
Mental Contamination and the Debiasing Problem
Wilson, T. D., Centerbar, D. B., & Brekke, N. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.012 · Cited by 160
The calibration of expert judgment: heuristics and biases beyond the laboratory
Koehler, D. J., Brenner, L., & Griffin, D. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.041 · Cited by 146
Kaplan, R. M., & Stone, A. A. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143736 · Cited by 144
Peak and End Effects in Patients' Daily Recall of Pain and Fatigue: A Within-Subjects Analysis
Schneider, S., Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., & Broderick, J. E. (2011) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2010.07.001 · Cited by 114
Kikuchi, H., Yoshiuchi, K., Miyasaka, N., Ohashi, K., Yamamoto, Y., Kumano, H., Kuboki, T., & Akabayashi, A. (2006) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01221.x · Cited by 69
Finan, P. H., Quartana, P. J., & Smith, M. T. (2013) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e31828ef1d6 · Cited by 65
Carlson, E. B., Field, N. P., Ruzek, J. I., Bryant, R. A., Dalenberg, C. J., Keane, T. M., & Spain, D. A. (2016) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1170-9 · Cited by 57
Ecologically assessed affect and suicidal ideation following psychiatric inpatient hospitalization
Armey, M. F., Brick, L., Schatten, H. T., Nugent, N. R., & Miller, I. W. (2020) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.09.008 · Cited by 56
The effects of interaction sequencing on user experience and preference
Cockburn, A., Quinn, P., & Gutwin, C. (2017) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.07.005 · Cited by 51
Do You Feel the Same? On the Robustness of Cued-Recall Debriefing for User Experience Evaluation
Bruun, A., Law, E. L.-C., Nielsen, T. D., & Heintz, M. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3453479 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Redelmeier, D. A., Katz, J., & Kahneman, D.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 187-194
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141523763
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
