Cited by 112Free Radicals and AntioxidantsNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsElectron Spin Resonance Studies

Reaction of tetrahydrobiopterin with superoxide: EPR-kinetic analysis and characterization of the pteridine radical

Vásquez-Vivar, Jeannette, Whitsett, Jennifer, Martásek, Pavel, Hogg, Neil, Kalyanaraman, B.·2001·Free Radical Biology and Medicine

Abstract

It has been shown that BH(4) ameliorates endothelial dysfunction associated with conditions such as hypertension, cigarette smoking, and diabetes. This effect has been proposed to be due to a superoxide scavenging activity of BH(4). To examine this possibility we determined the rate constant for the reaction between BH(4) and superoxide using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spin trapping competition experiments with 5-diethoxyphosphoryl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DEPMPO). We calculated a rate constant for the reaction between BH(4) and superoxide of 3.9 +/- 0.2 x 10(5) M(-1)s(-1) at pH 7.4 and room temperature. This result suggests that superoxide scavenging by BH(4) is not a major reaction in vivo. HPLC product analysis showed that 7,8-BH(2) and pterin are the stable products generated from the reaction. The formation of BH(4) cation radical (BH(4)(*+)) was demonstrated by direct EPR only under acidic conditions. Isotopic substitution experiments demonstrated that the BH(4)(*+) is mainly delocalized on the pyrazine ring of BH(4). In parallel experiments, we investigated the effect of ascorbate on 7,8-BH(2) reduction and eNOS activity. We demonstrated that ascorbate does not reduce 7,8-BH(2) to BH(4), nor does it stimulate nitric oxide release from eNOS incubated with 7,8-BH(2). In conclusion, it is likely that BH(4)-dependent inhibition of superoxide formation from eNOS is the mechanism that better explains the antioxidant effects of BH(4) in the vasculature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0891-5849(01)00680-3

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vásquez-Vivar, J., Whitsett, J., Martásek, P., Hogg, N., & Kalyanaraman, B.
Affiliations
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Venue
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
975-985
ISSN
0891-5849 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051459142
Cited by
112
References
51
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Free Radical Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM052419, GM-52419)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Free Radicals and Antioxidants
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electron Spin Resonance Studies
Keywords
tetrahydrobiopterin, superoxide, superoxide radical scavenging, endothelial nitric oxide synthase, vitamin C, nitric oxide release, antioxidant defense, endothelial dysfunction, rate constants
MeSH terms
Ascorbic Acid, Biopterins, Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy, Free Radicals, Kinetics, Oxidation-Reduction, Pterins, Superoxides, Free Radical Scavengers, Nitric Oxide Synthase, Nitric Oxide Synthase Type III

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review