Cited by 31Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Behavioral characteristics of pair bonding in the black tufted-ear marmoset (Callithrix penicillata)

Open access
Birnie, Andrew K., Smith, Adam S., Ågmo, Anders, French, Jeffrey A.·2012·Behaviour

Abstract

The present study describes how the development of a pair bond modifies social, sexual and aggressive behavior. Five heterosexual pairs of marmosets, previously unknown to each other, were formed at the beginning of the study. At the onset of pairing, social, sexual, exploratory and aggressive behaviors were recorded for 40 min. The animals were then observed for 20 min, both in the morning and afternoon for 21 days. The frequency and/or duration of behaviors recorded on Day 1 were compared to those recorded at later observations. The behavior displayed shortly after pairing should be completely unaffected by the pair bond, while such a bond should be present at later observations. Thus, it was possible to determine how the behavior between the pair was modified by the development of a pair bond. Social behaviors increased from Day 1 to Days 2-6 and all subsequent days observed. Conversely, other behaviors, such as open mouth displays (usually considered to be an invitation to sexual activity), had a high frequency during the early part of cohabitation but declined towards the end. Consequently, pair bonding manifests itself in an increased intensity of social behaviors. It is suggested that the intrinsically rewarding properties of grooming and perhaps other social behaviors turn the pair mate into a positive incentive, activating approach and further interactions when possible. Thus, the pair bond may be a motivational state activated by the conditioned incentive properties of the partner. This notion can explain all forms of pair bonds, including those occurring between individuals of the same sex and in promiscuous species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156853912x638454

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Marmosets are a highly social, cooperatively breeding New World primate that readily form and maintain long-term male-female relationships.

    “Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) are a highly social, cooperatively breeding New World primate that readily form and maintain long-term male-female relationships (Digby, 1995; Schaffner et al., 1995; Ågmo et al., 2012), and exhibit biparental and alloparental infant care (da Silva Mota et al., 2006).”
  • After eight weeks of cohabitation is a more than adequate duration of time to allow for significant establishment of a stable social bond in marmosets.

    “After eight weeks of cohabitation, which has been shown to be a more than adequate duration of time to allow for significant establishment of a stable social bond in marmosets (Ågmo et al., 2012), male and female marmosets underwent partner-preference testing.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Epple G 1977 Notes on the establishment and maintenance of the pair bond in Saguinus fuscicollis The biology and conservation of the Callitrichidae Kleiman DG Smithsonian Institution Press Washington, DC 231 237
  2. Kleiman DG 1977a Characteristics of reproduction and sociosexual interaction in pairs of lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia rosalia) during the reproductive cycle The biology and conservation of the Callitrichidae Kleiman DG Smithsonian Institution Press Washington, DC 181 190

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birnie, A. K., Smith, A. S., Ågmo, A., & French, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska at Omaha (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Venue
Behaviour
Published
2012
Volume
149
Issue
3-4
Pages
407-440
ISSN
  • 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-539X
OpenAlex
W2042675543
Cited by
31
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • University Research Committee, Emory University
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD042882, R56HD042882)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
pair bonding, Callithrix penicillata, social behavior, sexual behavior, aggression, grooming, approach behavior, primate social behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review