Cited by 373Human-Animal Interaction StudiesNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Short-Term interaction between dogs and their owners: effects on oxytocin, cortisol, insulin and heart rate an exploratory study

Handlin, Linda, Hydbring-Sandberg, Eva, Nilsson, Anne, Ejdebäck, Mikael, Jansson, Anna, Uvnäs-Moberg, Kerstin·2011·Anthrozoös

Abstract

The aim of this exploratory study was to determine heart rate and the levels of oxytocin, cortisol, and insulin in dogs and their owners in response to a short-term interaction. In addition, the dogs' behavior was studied. The owners' responses were compared with those obtained from a control group. Ten female volunteers and their own male Labrador dogs participated in an experiment during which the owner stroked, petted, and talked with her dog during the first 3 minutes. Blood samples were collected from both dog and owner before (0) and at 1, 3, 5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after the start of the interaction. Blood samples were analyzed by EIA. Heart rate was monitored telemetrically. The data were analyzed using linear mixed models and paired t-tests. The dogs' oxytocin levels were significantly increased 3 minutes after the start of the interaction (p = 0.027). Cortisol levels were significantly increased after 15 and 30 minutes (p = 0.004 and p = 0.022, respectively), and heart rate was significantly decreased after 55 minutes (p = 0.008). The dogs displayed normal behaviors during the experiment. The owners' oxytocin levels peaked between 1 and 5 minutes after interaction (p = 0.026). No such effect was seen in the controls. Cortisol levels displayed a significant decrease at 15 or 30 minutes in both owners and controls, and insulin levels did so at 60 minutes (p = 0.030, p = 0.002 and p = 0.002, p < 0.0001, respectively). Heart rate decreased significantly in the owners at 55 and 60 minutes (p = 0.0008) but not in the controls. In conclusion, short-term sensory interaction between dogs and their owners influences hormonal levels and heart rate. However, further studies need to be performed in order to better understand the effects of interaction between dogs and their owners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2752/175303711x13045914865385

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Handlin, L., Hydbring-Sandberg, E., Nilsson, A., Ejdebäck, M., Jansson, A., & Uvnäs-Moberg, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Skövde (SE)
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
  • Systems Biology Research Centre, University of Skövde, Sweden
Corresponding author
Handlin, Linda
Venue
Anthrozoös
Published
2011-09
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
301-315
ISSN
  • 0892-7936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-0377
OpenAlex
W1984975814
Cited by
373
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Anthrozoös (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
human-dog interaction, oxytocin, cortisol, insulin, heart rate, petting, stroking, human-animal bond, dogs, Labrador Retriever, stress hormones, human-dog communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review