The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements
Open accessAbstract
Delays in sensorimotor loops have led to the proposal that reaching movements are primarily under pre-programmed control and that sensory feedback loops exert an influence only at the very end of a trajectory. The present review challenges this view. Although behavioral data suggest that a motor plan is assembled prior to the onset of movement, more recent studies have indicated that this initial plan does not unfold unaltered, but is updated continuously by internal feedback loops. These loops rely on a forward model that integrates the sensory inflow and motor outflow to evaluate the consequence of the motor commands sent to a limb, such as the arm. In such a model, the probable position and velocity of an effector can be estimated with negligible delays and even predicted in advance, thus making feedback strategies possible for fast reaching movements. The parietal lobe and cerebellum appear to play a crucial role in this process. The ability of the motor system to estimate the future state of the limb might be an evolutionary substrate for mental operations that require an estimate of sequelae in the immediate future.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Mismatch detection and the forward model are involved in different aspects of motor execution: in motor control (for rapid online movement adaptation, for sensory attenuation), in motor learning (sensorimotor adaptation), but also for the sense of agency (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Blakemore and Sirigu, 2003; Jeannerod, 2009; Haggard, 2017; Dogge et al.,”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“Among these areas, the cerebellum is of particular interest and could be a comparator considering its unique architecture and connectivity (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Blakemore and Sirigu, 2003; Ito, 2006, 2008; Jeannerod, 2009; Tanaka et al., 2020; Figure 1).”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“The forward model integrates both the efference copy of the motor command and the sensory feedback to produce a prediction of the sensory consequences of the motor command.”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“On-line motor correction using the forward model would be faster than the processing time of using the sensory feedback alone.”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“It has thus been proposed that on-line motor control relies on a forward model.”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“These predictions are directly compared with the sensory feedback generated by the movement and thus provide an optimal estimate of the state of the effector; any discrepancy would be used to correct the on-going movement (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Tanaka et al., 2020).”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
Citations
Cites
An internal model for sensorimotor integration
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7569931 · Cited by 3,553
Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.
Kawato, M. (1999) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8 · Cited by 2,685
Das Reafferenzprinzip: Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie
von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950) · Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf00622503 · Cited by 2,655
Internal models in the cerebellum
Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01221-2 · Cited by 2,469
Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control
Miall, R. C., & Wolpert, D. M. (1996) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(96)00035-4 · Cited by 2,260
The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements
Duhamel, J.-R., Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1553535 · Cited by 1,966
THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT
Woodworth, R. S. (1899) · The Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0092992 · Cited by 1,747
Andersen, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C., & Xing, J. (1997) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.303 · Cited by 1,486
Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements.
Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C. E., & Keith Smith, J. E. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.3.340 · Cited by 1,406
Movement control in skilled motor performance.
Keele, S. W. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026739 · Cited by 1,176
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Keele, S.W. (1981) Behavioral analysis of movement. In Handbook of Physiology, Section 1: The Nervous System (Motor Control) (Vol. 2) (Brooks, W.B., ed.), pp. 1391–1414, Williams and Wilkins · DOI
- Arbib, M.A. (1981) Perceptual structures and distributed motor control. In Handbook of Physiology, Section 1: The Nervous System (Motor Control) (Vol. 2) (Brooks, W.B., ed.), pp. 1449–1480, Williams and Wilkins · DOI
- Jeannerod, M. (1988) The Neural and Behavioral Organization of Goal-Directed Movements, Clarendon Press
- Milner, 1992, A model for the generation of movements requiring endpoint precision, Neurosci., 49, 487, 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90113-G · DOI
- Pélisson, 1986, Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. II. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double step stimulus, Exp. Brain Res., 62, 303
- Gerdes, 1994, The use of internal representation in fast gold-directed movements: a modeling approach, Biol. Cybern., 70, 513, 10.1007/BF00198804 · DOI
- Paillard, J. (1982) The contribution of peripheral and central vision to visually guided reaching. In Analysis of Visual Behavior (Ingle,D.J. et al., eds), pp. 367–382, MIT Press
- Pelisson, 1995, Online compensation of gaze shifts perturbed by micro-stimulation of the superior colliculus in the cat with unrestrained head, Exp. Brain Res., 106, 196, 10.1007/BF00241115 · DOI
- Robinson, D. (1975) Oculomotor control signals. In Basic Mechanisms of Ocular Motility and their Clinical Implications (Lennerstrand, G. and Bach-y-Rita, P., eds), pp. 337–344, Pergamon Press
- Van Sonderen, 1989, Motor programs for goal-directed movements are continuously adjusted according to changes in target location, Exp. Brain Res., 78, 139, 10.1007/BF00230693 · DOI
- Gordon, 1994, Accuracy of planar reaching movements. 1. Independence of direction and extent variability, Exp. Brain Res., 99, 97, 10.1007/BF00241415 · DOI
- Vindras, 1998, Pointing errors reflect biases in the perception of the initial hand position, J. Neurophysiol., 79, 3290, 10.1152/jn.1998.79.6.3290 · DOI
- Prablanc, 1979, Optimal response of eye and hand motor system in pointing at visual target. I. Spatio-temporal characteristics of eye and hand movements and their relationships when varying the amount of visual information, Biol. Cybern., 35, 113, 10.1007/BF00337436 · DOI
- Desmurget, 1999, Functional anatomy of error correction during reaching movements in the dark, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 25, 787
- Inoue, 1998, PET study of pointing with visual feedback of moving hands, J. Neurophysiol., 79, 117, 10.1152/jn.1998.79.1.117 · DOI
- Kawato, 1987, A hierarchical neural-network model for control and learning of voluntary movement, Biol. Cybern., 57, 169, 10.1007/BF00364149 · DOI
- Johansson, 1984, Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when rougher or more slippery, Exp. Brain Res., 56, 550, 10.1007/BF00237997 · DOI
- Muller, 1994, Dyscoordination of pinch and lift forces during grasp in patients with cerebellar lesions, Exp. Brain Res., 101, 485, 10.1007/BF00227341 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,000
Cortical beta oscillations reflect the contextual gating of visual action feedback
Limanowski, J., Vladimir Litvak, A., & Friston, K. J. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117267 · Cited by 41
“…this (Bayesian) sensorimotor integration process, the brain adjusts how model predictions should respond to novel evidence by ‘gating’ sensory data, depending on the current context (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Friston et al., 2010;Körding & Wolpert, 2004; Sober & Sabes, 2005; Talsma et al., 2010).”
BackgroundStollenmaier, K., Ilg, W., & Haeufle, D. F. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00308 · Cited by 36
Infants’ Goal Prediction for Simple Action Events: The Role of Experience and Agency Cues
Elsner, B., & Adam, M. (2020) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12494 · Cited by 39
“Adults’ pre-shaping of their hand when reaching for differently sized target objects is taken as a hallmark example for feedforward motor control, guided by the target object’s visual features (e.g., Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundShafer, R. L., Solomon, E. M., Newell, K., Lewis, M., & Bodfish, J. (2019) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112214 · Cited by 34
Internal and External Feedback Circuits for Skilled Forelimb MovementPreprint
Azim, E., Fink, A. J. P., & Jessell, T. M. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.2014.79.024786 · Cited by 40
“In essence, the cerebellum has been argued to use internal copy signals to implement a forward model of the limb (Fig. 1; Wolpert and Miall 1996; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Shadmehr and Krakauer 2008).”
InfluentialInfluence of stimulus velocity profile on rhythmic visuomotor coordination.
Varlet, M., Coey, C. A., Schmidt, R., Marin, L., Bardy, B., & Richardson, M. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/a0037417 · Cited by 34
Tongue corticospinal modulation during attended verbal stimuli: Priming and coarticulation effects
D’Ausilio, A., Jarmolowska, J., Busan, P., Bufalari, I., & Craighero, L. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.022 · Cited by 36
Prevosto, V., Graf, W. M., & Ugolini, G. (2011) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07541.x · Cited by 36
“…cerebellum domains that process arm proprioceptive feedback (Prevosto et al., 2010a; see above), are suitable neural substrates for transmission to MIP of the proprioceptive signals required for planning and online correction of reaching (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Buneo & Andersen, 2006).”
BackgroundA model for production, perception, and acquisition of actions in face-to-face communication
Kröger, B. J., Kopp, S., & Lowit, A. (2009) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-009-0351-2 · Cited by 32
“It is important to note that sensory feedback information is extensively used for learning, i.e. for building up internal models (Kawato 1999; Arbib et al. 2000; Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundAwareness of intending to act following parietal cortex resection
Lafargue, G., & Duffau, H. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.04.019 · Cited by 32
“…cerebellum would hold internal models related to the automatic control of movement (Wolpert, Ghahramani, & Jordan, 1995), it has been suggested that the parietal cortex holds internal models related to the awareness of movement and intention (Blakemore & Sirigu, 2003; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
Pantomime of tool use: looking beyond apraxia
Osiurak, F., Reynaud, E., Baumard, J., Rossetti, Y., Bartolo, A., & Lesourd, M. (2021) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcab263 · Cited by 53
“166 Planning and controlling motor actions need to dynamically keep track of the spatial relations between different body parts, 167–169 which is referred to as body schema.”
Self-attribution of distorted reaching movements in immersive virtual reality
Debarba, H. G., Boulic, R., Salomon, R., Blanke, O., & Herbelin, B. (2018) · Computers & Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.cag.2018.09.001 · Cited by 39
Daily modulation of the speed–accuracy trade-off
Gueugneau, N., Pozzo, T., Darlot, C., & Papaxanthis, C. (2017) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.04.043 · Cited by 39
“However, arm movements are regulated by both feedforward (motor planning and prediction) and feedback (sensorimotor correction) processes (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
Too Good to be True? Ideomotor Theory from a Computational Perspective
Herbort, O., & Butz, M. V. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00494 · Cited by 27
“ThisdistinctionisalsomadeinAdams’ 1971)closedloop of models assume different functions (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundA kinematic analysis of visually-guided movement in Williams syndrome.
Hocking, D., Rinehart, N., McGinley, J., Moss, S., & Bradshaw, J. (2011) · Journal of Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2010.11.001 · Cited by 33
Obstacle avoidance during online corrections.
Chapman, C., & Goodale, M. (2010) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/10.11.17 · Cited by 33
Evaluation of Trajectory Planning Models for Arm-Reaching Movements Based on Energy Cost
Nishii, J., & Taniai, Y. (2009) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2009.06-08-798 · Cited by 37
“These results also indicate that the torque profile of human arm reaching seems to be insensitive to the SDN and enables the suppression of the expected value of the energy cost, which might be an important finding, although not only open-loop control (Khan et al., 2003) as assumed in our simulation, but also closed-loo…”
BackgroundCorrective Processes in Grasping After Perturbations of Object Size
Hesse, C., & Franz, V. (2009) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.3200/jmbr.41.3.253-273 · Cited by 33
de Bernardis, P., Knox, P., & Bruno, N. (2005) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-004-2121-9 · Cited by 33
“…Knox Division of Orthoptics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK Present address: P. Bernardis Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39/E, 43100 Parma, Italy hand–eye coordination in reaching see Carey 2000; Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundClaassen, D. O., Jones, C. R. G., Yu, M., Dirnberger, G., Malone, T., Parkinson, M. H., Giunti, P., Kubovy, M., & Jahanshahi, M. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.018 · Cited by 33
Review of Models for the Generation of Multi-Joint Movements in 3-D
Gielen, S. C. A. M. (2008) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2_28 · Cited by 36
Cerebellar circuit computations for predictive motor control
Nguyen, K. P., & Person, A. L. (2025) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-025-00936-z · Cited by 37
“Many other brain regions such as the motor cortex have also been proposed to compute internal models 176 and to compare them with sensory feedback to generate motor corrections 176–182 .”
Receptor-driven, multimodal mapping of cortical areas in the macaque monkey intraparietal sulcus
Niu, M., Impieri, D., Rapan, L., Funck, T., Palomero‐Gallagher, N., & Zilles, K. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.55979 · Cited by 32
Joch, M., Hegele, M., Maurer, H., Müller, H., & Maurer, L. K. (2017) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00036.2017 · Cited by 38
“But evidence that humans do integrate information from the efference copy with sensory feedback in the forward model to achieve a more accurate prediction of behavioral effect has already been shown in several studies (Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Shadmehr et al. 2010; Wolpert et al. 1995).”
ResultBrain Activity During Phonation in Women With Muscle Tension Dysphonia: An fMRI Study
Kryshtopava, M., Lierde, K. M. V., Meerschman, I., D’haeseleer, E., Vandemaele, P., Vingerhoets, G., & Claeys, S. (2017) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.03.010 · Cited by 34
Rapid decrement in the effects of the Ponzo display dissociates action and perception
Whitwell, R. L., Buckingham, G., Enns, J., Chouinard, P., & Goodale, M. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0975-4 · Cited by 32
“Movement updating can occur during the movement itself and/or after the movement is completed (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Kawato, 1999).”
BackgroundPanasiti, M. S., Pavone, E. F., & Aglioti, S. M. (2016) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.01.023 · Cited by 43
“In this vein, the posterior parietal cortex appears to be involved in the real-time control of movements by constantly updating the internal motor program associated with the observed actions (Wolpert et al., 1995; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundNeural correlates of error prediction in a complex motor task
Maurer, L. K., Maurer, H., & Müller, H. (2015) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00209 · Cited by 33
Development of interactions between sensorimotor representations in school-aged children
Kagerer, F., & Clark, J. E. (2014) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2014.02.001 · Cited by 32
“…movements (Jeannerod, 1988), and that accurate kinesthetic guidance of an effector depends on the integration of feedforward and feedback signals (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000), this result would suggest that the integration of kinesthetic feedback and feedforward operates less efficiently in the…”
BackgroundDevelopment of state estimation explains improvements in sensorimotor performance across childhood
King, B. R., de Oliveira, M. A., Contreras-Vidal, J. L., & Clark, J. E. (2012) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00932.2011 · Cited by 27
“Thus predicting future states based on efference copies of motor commands can be used as an internal reference to circumvent processing delays, a finding that has been demonstrated in adults (Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Tseng et al. 2007; Wagner and Smith 2008; Wolpert and Flanagan 2001).”
BackgroundTorres, E., Raymer, A. L., Rothi, L. G. G., Heilman, K., & Poizner, H. (2010) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00089.2010 · Cited by 32
“Furthermore, manipulations of sensory information have separated kinematics-based from dynamics-based learning (Krakauer et al. 1999) and defined important distinctions in the on-line control of reaching motions regarding the roles of motor and parietal regions (Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundBeyond distance and direction: The brain represents target locations non-metrically
Thaler, L. (2010) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/10.3.3 · Cited by 31
A prototype fingertip with high spatial resolution pressure sensing for the robot iCub
Schmitz, A., Maggiali, M., Randazzo, M., Natale, L., & Metta, G. (2008) · IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots · doi:10.1109/ichr.2008.4755988 · Cited by 32
“On the one hand, planning movements accurately beforehand is often too hard, on the other feedback control i s often too slow to affect control appropriately [5][6].”
BackgroundSeparate Areas for Mirror Responses and Agency within the Parietal Operculum
Agnew, Z. K., & Wise, R. J. S. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2836-08.2008 · Cited by 42
“An ensuing action generates afferent feedback that is required for action monitoring and modification (Kawato, 1999), until its execution becomes optimal (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundActing while perceiving: assimilation precedes contrast
Grosjean, M., Zwickel, J., & Prinz, W. (2008) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0146-6 · Cited by 25
“Thus, participants would have had enough time to perform such adjustments (e.g., Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Paillard, 1996).”
BackgroundInfluentialHigh loads induce differences between actual and imagined movement duration
Slifkin, A. B. (2007) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-007-1154-2 · Cited by 33
“Thus, the forward model can operate in the absence of online sensorimotor feedback (e.g., Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
InfluentialNear-Optimal Human Adaptive Control across Different Noise Environments
Chhabra, M., & Jacobs, R. A. (2006) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2238-06.2006 · Cited by 27
“When learning about the dynamics, the person learns about the relationships between control signals and the expected responses to these signals (Miall and Wolpert, 1996; Flanagan and Wing, 1997; Johansson, 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
Visual feedback reduces bimanual coupling of movement amplitudes, but not of directions
de Oliveira, S. C., & Barthélémy, S. (2005) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-004-2107-7 · Cited by 32
“…influences of visual information on movement performance suggest that the visuomotor control loop during ongoing movements may take less time than previously assumed (as in Bushan and Shadmehr 1999, see also reviews about fast visuomotor control loops: Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Paillard 1996).”
Playing tennis with the cerebellum
Iacoboni, M. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/88365 · Cited by 32
Shafer, R. L., Wang, Z., Bartolotti, J., & Mosconi, M. W. (2021) · Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1186/s11689-021-09381-2 · Cited by 31
“Parietal-cerebellar circuits also form a faster subcortical pathway for translating sensory error information into corrective motor commands relayed to motor cortex [88, 89].”
BackgroundFougeront, N., & Fleiter, B. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1139/cjpp-2018-0100 · Cited by 31
Sensorimotor Learning during a Marksmanship Task in Immersive Virtual Reality
Rao, H., Khanna, R., Zielinski, D. J., Lu, Y., Clements, J., Potter, N. D., Sommer, M., Kopper, R., & Appelbaum, L. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00058 · Cited by 31
“The impact of sensory information in the motor process differs between two general components of movements: ballistic and refinement (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Elliott et al., 2001, 2010; Urbin et al., 2011).”
BackgroundPrism adaptation magnitude has differential influences on perceptual versus manual responses
Striemer, C. L., Russell, K., & Nath, P. (2016) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-016-4678-5 · Cited by 30
Afferent and Efferent Aspects of Mandibular Sensorimotor Control in Adults Who Stutter
Daliri, A., Prokopenko, R. A., & Max, L. (2013) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0134 · Cited by 32
Aging and Motor Variability: A Test of the Neural Noise Hypothesis
Sosnoff, J. J., & Newell, K. M. (2011) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/0361073x.2011.590754 · Cited by 31
“This view affords the hypothesis that the elderly have a reduced capacity to adapt the faster time scales in both feedback and feedforward processes (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000 ; Sosnoff & Newell, 2008 ).”
BackgroundGuillaud, E., Simoneau, M., & Blouin, J. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.035 · Cited by 31
Limitations of feedforward control in multiple-phase steering movements
Cloete, S., & Wallis, G. (2009) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1813-6 · Cited by 31
Habas, C., & Cabanis, E. (2008) · Neuroradiology · doi:10.1007/s00234-007-0354-6 · Cited by 31
Nicholson, V., Keogh, J., & Low-Choy, N. (2018) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s164401 · Cited by 30
“During imagined movements, forward models generate the prediction of movement timing, but do so via central commands in the absence of sensory feedback which likely accounts for the greater variability in the timing of imagined actions compared with physical actions.(17,48) This is particularly evident in successful l…”
BackgroundMethodNiechwiej‐Szwedo, E., Goltz, H. C., Colpa, L., Chandrakumar, M., & WONG, A. M. F. (2017) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.16-20727 · Cited by 36
Campione, G. C., Piazza, C., Villa, L. M., & Molteni, M. (2016) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2732-6 · Cited by 35
“According to the dual models of motor control (Arbib 1981; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Glover 2004; Meyer et al. 1988), upper limb movements are generally segmented into two components.”
MethodFROM SENSORS TO SPIKES: EVOLVING RECEPTIVE FIELDS TO ENHANCE SENSORIMOTOR INFORMATION IN A ROBOT-ARM
Luque, N. R., Garrido, J. A., Ralli, J., Laredo, J. L. J., & Ros, E. (2012) · International Journal of Neural Systems · doi:10.1142/s012906571250013x · Cited by 30
Parietal encoding of action in depth
Ferraina, S., Battaglia‐Mayer, A., Genovesio, A., Archambault, P. S., & Caminiti, R. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.028 · Cited by 33
Are Visual Feedback Delays Responsible for Aging-Related Increases in Force Variability?
Sosnoff, J. J., & Newell, K. M. (2007) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/03610730701525311 · Cited by 28
“…processes are particularly involved in contributing to the higher frequency processes of control in a constant force level task goal (Newell, Broderick, Deutsch, & Slifkin, 2003) and the regulation of movement control at intermittencies shorter than a reaction time (cf. Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundOn the neurodynamics of the creation of consciousness
Taylor, J. G. (2006) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-006-9011-8 · Cited by 28
Danckert, J., Revol, P., Pisella, L., Krolak-Salmon, P., Vighetto, A., Goodale, M., & Rossetti, Y. (2003) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00292-0 · Cited by 30
“Although previous research has suggested that the PPC plays a crucial role in updating motor programs and spatial representations [8,9,12,21,24,29,34,35,37,38,42,43], it is likely that this kind of updating occurs in a much more automatic way.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialUsing arm configuration to learn the effects of gyroscopes and other devices.
Flanders, M., Hondzinski, J. M., Soechting, J. F., & Jackson, J. (2003) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00053.2002 · Cited by 30
“This new evidence is also compatible with a hypothetical scheme in which movements are generated based on a moment by moment comparison of current and desired arm postures (Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Soechting and Flanders 2002).”
ResultHandedness Matters for Motor Control But Not for Prediction
Mathew, J., Sarlegna, F. R., Bernier, P., & Danion, F. (2019) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0136-19.2019 · Cited by 35
“The scheme presented in Figure 8 in which we hypothesize different controllers but similar predictors raises a question: why do participants exhibit worse hand-tracking performance with the left hand, if prediction is supposedly as accurate for right and left hand movements? It has been proposed that forward modeling…”
BackgroundInfluentialShafer, R. L., Newell, K. M., Lewis, M. H., & Bodfish, J. W. (2017) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2017.00019 · Cited by 29
Kim, C.-Y., Lee, J., & Kim, H.-D. (2016) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000000541 · Cited by 29
“By combining the clinical tool and gait performance measurements, it is possible to examinewhether functional improvement is accompanied by a change in gait kinematics suggestive of motor control changes.(19) The outcomes of the 10-m walk test, gait velocity, stride length, gait symmetry ratio, and double-support peri…”
MethodProtracted Development of the Proprioceptive Brain Network During and Beyond Adolescence
Cignetti, F., Fontan, A., Menant, J. C., Nazarian, B., Anton, J., Vaugoyeau, M., & Assaiante, C. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv323 · Cited by 35
“It also largely contributes to forming internal representations of the body and its kinematics, which are key components of internal forward models that adjust and refine movement in real time (Wolpert et al. 1995; Wolpert 1997; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Shadmehr and Krakauer 2008).”
BackgroundFuelscher, I. T., Williams, J., & Hyde, C. E. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.06.013 · Cited by 28
Kim, C.-Y., Lee, J., Lee, J. H., Kim, Y.-G., Shin, A.-R., Shim, Y.-H., & Ha, H. K. (2015) · Journal of Physical Therapy Science · doi:10.1589/jpts.27.1091 · Cited by 29
Decoupling the actions of the eyes from the hand alters beta and gamma synchrony within SPL
Sayegh, P. F., Hawkins, K. M., Neagu, B., Crawford, J. D., Hoffman, K. L., & Sergio, L. E. (2014) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00793.2013 · Cited by 27
“…that combine efference copy motor commands, sensory feedback (visual and proprioceptive), and an internal model regarding the dynamics of the arm (BattagliaMayer et al. 2013; Buneo and Andersen 2006; Desmurget et al. 1999; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Vesia and Crawford 2012; Wolpert et al. 1998).”
BackgroundHayashibe, M., & Shimoda, S. (2014) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2014.00021 · Cited by 27
“Optimal movement control likely reflects a combination of both feedback and feedforward processes (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundPlanning and adjustments for the control of reach extent in a virtual environment
Stewart, J., Gordon, J., & Winstein, C. (2013) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-10-27 · Cited by 29
“Such a control pattern is consistent with the idea of an internal model for the control of reach actions [40,41].”
ResultComputational explorations of perceptual symbol systems theory
Pezzulo, G., & Calvi, G. (2011) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.004 · Cited by 29
“…that there are several other roles of forward models in action control, such as compensation of sensory processing delays, cancellation of self-generated stimuli; for a general discussion, see Desmurget and Grafton (2000), Miall, Weir, Wolpert, and Stein (1993), and Wolpert and Ghahramani (2004).”
Motor imagery facilitates force field learning.
Anwar, M. N., Tomi, N., & Ito, K. (2011) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.04.030 · Cited by 29
The adaptive range of 1/f isometric force production.
Sosnoff, J. J., Valantine, A. D., & Newell, K. M. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0012731 · Cited by 25
Richards, J., Mulavara, A., & Bloomberg, J. (2007) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0738-6 · Cited by 29
“comparing on-line predicted and observed events (Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundHow the conception of control influences our understanding of actions
Floegel, M., Kasper, J., Perrier, P., & Kell, C. A. (2023) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-023-00691-z · Cited by 36
The role of grasping demands on tactile suppression.
Voudouris, D., & Fiehler, K. (2022) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2022.102957 · Cited by 28
Cerebellum-inspired approach for adaptive kinematic control of soft robots
Kalidindi, H. T., Thuruthel, T. G., Laschi, C., & Falotico, E. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft) · doi:10.1109/robosoft.2019.8722735 · Cited by 31
“The existence of ubiquitous hybrid control loops involving cerebellum with brain-stem, pre-motor systems and parietal lobes is particularly interesting for adaptive goal-directed movement control [16].”
BackgroundFunctional magnetic resonance imaging of sensorimotor transformations in saccades and antisaccades
Herweg, N. A., Weber, B., Kasparbauer, A., Meyhöfer, I., Steffens, M., Smyrnis, N., & Ettinger, U. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.033 · Cited by 29
“It has been proposed that online control of fast movements relies on a forward model that estimates the current position of the effector by integrating initial movement conditions, efferent motor signals, and sensory signals (Andersen and Cui, 2009; Chen-Harris et al., 2008; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundRuiz, M. H., Huebl, J., Schönecker, T., Kupsch, A. R., Yarrow, K., Krauss, J. K., Schneider, G., & Kühn, A. A. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht002 · Cited by 23
Macuga, K. L., & Frey, S. H. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.024 · Cited by 26
“Isolating the neural mechanisms that implement these processes has, however, proven to be quite challenging, and the superior parietal lobule (SPL), inferior parietal lobule (IPL), and cerebellumhave been implicated in both the feedback and feedforward control of movements (Blakemore and Sirigu, 2003; Desmurget and Gr…”
Cloutman, L. L., Binney, R. J., Morris, D. M., Parker, G. J. M., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2013) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.06.005 · Cited by 29
“…SMG in the transformation of sensory input into motor output, and the sensory guidance of behaviour (Binkofski & Buxbaum, 2012; Della-Maggiore, Malfait, Ostry, & Paus, 2004; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Desmurget et al., 2009; Rozzi, Ferrari, Bonini, Rizzolatti, & Fogassi, 2008; Rozzi et al., 2006).”
Coordinated flexibility: How initial gaze position modulates eye-hand coordination and reaching.
Adam, J. J., Buetti, S., & Kerzel, D. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0027592 · Cited by 25
Observed reach trajectory influences executed reach kinematics in prehension
Hardwick, R. M., & Edwards, M. (2010) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.538068 · Cited by 25
Karok, S., & Newport, R. (2010) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.10.006 · Cited by 28
“There has been an ongoing debate within motor control as to whether movements are entirely preplanned (Plamondon, 1995), continuously regulated by afferent information (e.g. Ulloa & Bullock, 2003) or a combination of the two (i.e. an " integrative hybrid " ; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
Thaler, L., & Todd, J. T. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.039 · Cited by 30
“…that transform visual input into motor commands as well as the parameters that are controlled by the motor system in the planning and control of movements are an area of active research (for reviews see: Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Desmurget et al., 1998; Lacquaniti & Caminiti, 1998; Todorov, 2004).”
BackgroundVestibular contribution to the planning of reach trajectories
Bockisch, C., & Haslwanter, T. (2007) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-007-0997-x · Cited by 28
“Historically, feedback control for fast movements was not considered significant, although this view is changing (Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Flanders et al. 2003).”
Visual cortex activation in kinesthetic guidance of reaching
Darling, W. G., Seitz, R. J., Peltier, S., Tellmann, L., & Butler, A. J. (2006) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0815-x · Cited by 25
“They can also move the dominant hand accurately to a visual target without vision of the hand, indicating that kinesthetic guidance and/or efference copy of motor commands of hand movement can support visually guided reaching (Bard et al. 1999; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Vercher et al. 1994).”
BackgroundManual tracking in three dimensions
Mrotek, L. A., Gielen, C. C. A. M., & Flanders, M. (2005) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0282-9 · Cited by 18
“However, models of manual and smooth pursuit tracking typically do not take advantage of this strategy and instead, inputs related to target velocity are used to derive an error signal to drive hand or eye acceleration (Engel and Soechting 2000; Churchland and Lisberger 2001).”
MethodFeatures of motor performance that drive adaptation in rapid hand movements
Novak, K. E., Miller, L. E., & Houk, J. C. (2003) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1288-1 · Cited by 26
“…with noise and variability of rapid movements by monitoring efference copy and sensory afference and adjusting movements when errors occur or are predicted to occur as a result of natural variability (Gordon and Ghez 1987; Meyer et al. 1988; Messier and Kalaska 1999; Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundColtman, S. K., & Gribble, P. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.04.25.061382 · Cited by 27
“It has been proposed that the brain uses internal models to predict the sensory consequences of a motor command (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Miall and Wolpert, 1996; Wolpert et al., 1998; Wolpert and Flanagan, 2001).”
BackgroundPeviani, V., Liotta, J., & Bottini, G. (2020) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103003 · Cited by 27
Surkar, S., Hoffman, R., Davies, B., Harbourne, R., & Kurz, M. (2018) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2018.06.009 · Cited by 27
Oguz, O. S., Zhou, Z., Glasauer, S., & Wollherr, D. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23792-7 · Cited by 30
Long-term effects of acoustic reafference training (ART)
Pizzera, A., Hohmann, T., Streese, L., Habbig, A., & Raab, M. (2017) · European Journal of Sport Science · doi:10.1080/17461391.2017.1381767 · Cited by 27
“With regard to the reafference principle (Blakemore et al., 2000; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Wolpert & Flanagan, 2001), it is speculated that acoustic feedback is used together with internal models to predict action consequences and compare them to actual feedback while running.”
BackgroundTia, B., Takemi, M., Kosugi, A., Castagnola, E., Ansaldo, A., Nakamura, T., Ricci, D., Ushiba, J., Fadiga, L., & Iriki, A. (2017) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp274629 · Cited by 37
“…signals from somatosensory cortex to M1 (see also, in macaques, Brochier et al. 1999; Brovelli et al. 2004; Gardner et al. 2007; Witham et al. 2010), whereas gamma oscillations could intervene in the prediction of sensory consequences of actions (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Shadmehr et al. 2010).”
BackgroundThe Early Indicators of Functional Decrease in Mild Cognitive Impairment
Kubicki, A., Fautrelle, L., Bourrelier, J., Rouaud, O., & Mourey, F. (2016) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2016.00193 · Cited by 28
“…of this central part of motor control, researchers have usually focused on the preparatory period, which includes motor program processes, and well-known as Anticipatory Postural Adjustments (APA; Belen’kii et al., 1967; Massion, 1992; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Maloney and Mamassian, 2009).”
BackgroundThreading neural feedforward into a mechanical spring: How biology exploits physics in limb control
Kalveram, K., Schinauer, T., Beirle, S., Richter, S., & Jansen-Osmann, P. (2005) · Biological cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-005-0542-6 · Cited by 27
“…measurements based on explicit peripheral sensing, and is widely accepted (Kalveram 1992; Stroeve 1997; Kalveram 1998; Wolpert and Kawato 1998; Bhushan and Shadmehr 1999; Kawato 1999; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Flanagan et al. 2003), though not completely uncontroversial (Ostry and Feldman 2003).”
BackgroundKatinka Dijkstra, B., & Zwaan, R. A. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315775845.ch28 · Cited by 23
Motor synergies: Evidence for a novel motor signature in autism spectrum disorder
Emanuele, M., Nazzaro, G., Marini, M., Veronesi, C., Boni, S., Polletta, G., D’Ausilio, A., & Fadiga, L. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104652 · Cited by 33
Robust feedforward control of robotic arms with friction model uncertainty
Plooij, M., Wolfslag, W. J., & Wisse, M. (2015) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2015.03.008 · Cited by 25
“use feedforward control for fast motions and are still able to perform their tasks accurately [2].”
BackgroundAo, D., Song, R., & Tong, R. K. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128328 · Cited by 28
“Target-directed arm movements are essential components of people’s daily activities, which usually require high levels of motion speed and accuracy [1,2].”
BackgroundDeconinck, F., van Polanen, V., Savelsbergh, G., & Bennett, S. (2011) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2782-0 · Cited by 26
“This confirms earlier findings, suggesting that the initial part of pointing movements are planned on the basis of peripheral retinal coordinates and efference commands to the ocular system ( Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Prablanc et al. 1979a, b). However, gaze was found to remain ‘anchored’ to the first target and thu…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialControl of Predictive Error Correction During a Saccadic Double-Step Task
Sharika, K. M., Ramakrishnan, A., & Murthy, A. (2008) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.90238.2008 · Cited by 23
“Alternatively, fast online error correction may involve a comparison of the spatial location of the goal with the anticipated eye displacement using feedforward control (Shadmehr and Mussa Ivaldi 1994; Bernstein et al. 1995; Wolpert et al. 1995; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Vaziri et al. 2006) such that any deviations…”
BackgroundDunbar, D. C. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.01282 · Cited by 29
“…tasks of accommodating surface changes are so reduced, overall limb movements during treadmill locomotion could be largely determined by efference copy (von Holst, 1954; von Holst and Mittelstaedt, 1950; see Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Wolpert, 1997; Wolpert and Ghahramani, 2000 for reviews).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grafton, Scott
- ORCID
- Grafton, Scott
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 423-431
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084145388
- Cited by
- 1,300
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 51
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Keywords
- forward model, sensorimotor delay, feedback control, reaching movements, motor planning, parietal lobe, cerebellum, motor control, mental time travel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review