The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements
Open accessAbstract
Delays in sensorimotor loops have led to the proposal that reaching movements are primarily under pre-programmed control and that sensory feedback loops exert an influence only at the very end of a trajectory. The present review challenges this view. Although behavioral data suggest that a motor plan is assembled prior to the onset of movement, more recent studies have indicated that this initial plan does not unfold unaltered, but is updated continuously by internal feedback loops. These loops rely on a forward model that integrates the sensory inflow and motor outflow to evaluate the consequence of the motor commands sent to a limb, such as the arm. In such a model, the probable position and velocity of an effector can be estimated with negligible delays and even predicted in advance, thus making feedback strategies possible for fast reaching movements. The parietal lobe and cerebellum appear to play a crucial role in this process. The ability of the motor system to estimate the future state of the limb might be an evolutionary substrate for mental operations that require an estimate of sequelae in the immediate future.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Mismatch detection and the forward model are involved in different aspects of motor execution: in motor control (for rapid online movement adaptation, for sensory attenuation), in motor learning (sensorimotor adaptation), but also for the sense of agency (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Blakemore and Sirigu, 2003; Jeannerod, 2009; Haggard, 2017; Dogge et al.,”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“Among these areas, the cerebellum is of particular interest and could be a comparator considering its unique architecture and connectivity (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Blakemore and Sirigu, 2003; Ito, 2006, 2008; Jeannerod, 2009; Tanaka et al., 2020; Figure 1).”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“The forward model integrates both the efference copy of the motor command and the sensory feedback to produce a prediction of the sensory consequences of the motor command.”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“On-line motor correction using the forward model would be faster than the processing time of using the sensory feedback alone.”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“It has thus been proposed that on-line motor control relies on a forward model.”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“These predictions are directly compared with the sensory feedback generated by the movement and thus provide an optimal estimate of the state of the effector; any discrepancy would be used to correct the on-going movement (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Tanaka et al., 2020).”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
Citations
Cites
An internal model for sensorimotor integration
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7569931 · Cited by 3,553
Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.
Kawato, M. (1999) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8 · Cited by 2,685
Das Reafferenzprinzip: Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie
von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950) · Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf00622503 · Cited by 2,655
Internal models in the cerebellum
Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01221-2 · Cited by 2,469
Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control
Miall, R. C., & Wolpert, D. M. (1996) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(96)00035-4 · Cited by 2,260
The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements
Duhamel, J.-R., Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1553535 · Cited by 1,966
THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT
Woodworth, R. S. (1899) · The Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0092992 · Cited by 1,747
Andersen, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C., & Xing, J. (1997) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.303 · Cited by 1,486
Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements.
Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C. E., & Keith Smith, J. E. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.3.340 · Cited by 1,406
Movement control in skilled motor performance.
Keele, S. W. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026739 · Cited by 1,176
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Keele, S.W. (1981) Behavioral analysis of movement. In Handbook of Physiology, Section 1: The Nervous System (Motor Control) (Vol. 2) (Brooks, W.B., ed.), pp. 1391–1414, Williams and Wilkins · DOI
- Arbib, M.A. (1981) Perceptual structures and distributed motor control. In Handbook of Physiology, Section 1: The Nervous System (Motor Control) (Vol. 2) (Brooks, W.B., ed.), pp. 1449–1480, Williams and Wilkins · DOI
- Jeannerod, M. (1988) The Neural and Behavioral Organization of Goal-Directed Movements, Clarendon Press
- Milner, 1992, A model for the generation of movements requiring endpoint precision, Neurosci., 49, 487, 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90113-G · DOI
- Pélisson, 1986, Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. II. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double step stimulus, Exp. Brain Res., 62, 303
- Gerdes, 1994, The use of internal representation in fast gold-directed movements: a modeling approach, Biol. Cybern., 70, 513, 10.1007/BF00198804 · DOI
- Paillard, J. (1982) The contribution of peripheral and central vision to visually guided reaching. In Analysis of Visual Behavior (Ingle,D.J. et al., eds), pp. 367–382, MIT Press
- Pelisson, 1995, Online compensation of gaze shifts perturbed by micro-stimulation of the superior colliculus in the cat with unrestrained head, Exp. Brain Res., 106, 196, 10.1007/BF00241115 · DOI
- Robinson, D. (1975) Oculomotor control signals. In Basic Mechanisms of Ocular Motility and their Clinical Implications (Lennerstrand, G. and Bach-y-Rita, P., eds), pp. 337–344, Pergamon Press
- Van Sonderen, 1989, Motor programs for goal-directed movements are continuously adjusted according to changes in target location, Exp. Brain Res., 78, 139, 10.1007/BF00230693 · DOI
- Gordon, 1994, Accuracy of planar reaching movements. 1. Independence of direction and extent variability, Exp. Brain Res., 99, 97, 10.1007/BF00241415 · DOI
- Vindras, 1998, Pointing errors reflect biases in the perception of the initial hand position, J. Neurophysiol., 79, 3290, 10.1152/jn.1998.79.6.3290 · DOI
- Prablanc, 1979, Optimal response of eye and hand motor system in pointing at visual target. I. Spatio-temporal characteristics of eye and hand movements and their relationships when varying the amount of visual information, Biol. Cybern., 35, 113, 10.1007/BF00337436 · DOI
- Desmurget, 1999, Functional anatomy of error correction during reaching movements in the dark, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 25, 787
- Inoue, 1998, PET study of pointing with visual feedback of moving hands, J. Neurophysiol., 79, 117, 10.1152/jn.1998.79.1.117 · DOI
- Kawato, 1987, A hierarchical neural-network model for control and learning of voluntary movement, Biol. Cybern., 57, 169, 10.1007/BF00364149 · DOI
- Johansson, 1984, Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when rougher or more slippery, Exp. Brain Res., 56, 550, 10.1007/BF00237997 · DOI
- Muller, 1994, Dyscoordination of pinch and lift forces during grasp in patients with cerebellar lesions, Exp. Brain Res., 101, 485, 10.1007/BF00227341 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,000
Task goal and grip force dynamics
Jordan, K., & Newell, K. M. (2004) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1806-9 · Cited by 24
“The task goal of producing a target force level introduced the use of visual feedback and feedforward processes so that the force signal was of a higher dimension (Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundNeuropsychological perspectives on eye-hand coordination in visually-guided reaching.
Carey, D., Sala, S. D., & Ietswaart, M. (2002) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(02)40059-3 · Cited by 26
Fast prediction in marmoset reach-to-grasp movements for dynamic prey
Shaw, L., Wang, K.-H., & Mitchell, J. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.10.08.511417 · Cited by 25
Implicit mechanisms of intention
Aflalo, T., Zhang, C. Y., Revechkis, B., Rosario, E. R., Pouratian, N., & Andersen, R. A. (2022) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.03.047 · Cited by 33
Practice modality of motor sequences impacts the neural signature of motor imagery
Krüger, B., Hettwer, M. D., Zabicki, A., de Haas, B., Munzert, J., & Zentgraf, K. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76214-y · Cited by 31
Singh, A. K., Gramann, K., Chen, H.-T., & Lin, C.-T. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.04.21.053512 · Cited by 25
“The concurrent processing of proprioceptive feedback and its comparison with the predicted feedback when an action is executed, is one major sensory source for controlling the accuracy of the movement itself ( Desmurget and Grafton, 2000 ).”
Yamada, C., Itaguchi, Y., & Fukuzawa, K. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215331 · Cited by 31
Cignetti, F., Vaugoyeau, M., Fontan, A., Jover, M., Livet, M.-O., Hugonenq, C., Audic, F., Chabrol, B., & Assaiante, C. (2018) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2018.03.001 · Cited by 27
“…and includes both the pre-programming of the motor command before the onset of movement, aka the feedforward control, and the adjustment of the motor command in near real time, aka the online control (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Kawato, 1999; Shadmehr & Krakauer, 2008; Wolpert & Ghahramani, 2000).”
BackgroundPeople accurately predict the transition probabilities between actions
Thornton, M., & Tamir, D. I. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd4995 · Cited by 25
“Studies of human action dynamics have primarily focused on the dynamics within actions, such as how the motor control of reaching actions unfolds over time (20).”
BackgroundVestibular feedback maintains reaching accuracy during body movement
Smith, C. P., & Reynolds, R. (2016) · Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp273125 · Cited by 25
“It requires continuous processing of hand and target position, comparing the predicted outcome of the movement with the intended target location and correcting for any error (Desmurget et al. 1998; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundCritical Index of Difficulty for Different Body Motions: A Review
Hoffmann, E. R. (2015) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.2015.1090389 · Cited by 25
“Such models are given in a number of sources such as Sabes (2000) and Desmurget and Grafton (2000).”
BackgroundKim, C., Lee, J. S., Kim, H.-D., Kim, J., & Lee, I.-H. (2015) · Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology · doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.03.004 · Cited by 21
Effector mass and trajectory optimization in the online regulation of goal-directed movement
Burkitt, J. J., Staite, V., Yeung, A., Elliott, D., & Lyons, J. L. (2015) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-014-4191-7 · Cited by 25
“The impulse control discussed by Elliott et al. (2010) is similar in some ways to the type of early, continuous control discussed by Desmurget and Grafton (2000) in their hybrid model.”
MethodDipietro, L., Howard Poizner, A., & Krebs, H. I. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00593 · Cited by 23
“Their parameters, namely latencies of peak value, of onset and offset (defined as the time when the submovement went respectively above and below 5% of its peak value), as well as peak value and sigma or standard deviation were calculated.”
Proactive Action Preparation: Seeing Action Preparation as a Continuous and Proactive Process
Pezzulo, G., & Ognibene, D. (2012) · Motor Control · doi:10.1123/mcj.16.3.386 · Cited by 27
“…off-line have to be compatible with the on-line execution of action; how this is possible, and how off-line planning and on-line (feedback) control are integrated, are widely discussed topics that go beyond the scope of this paper (see e.g., Cisek, 2005; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Sabes, 2000).”
BackgroundCompensation for Changing Motor Uncertainty
Hudson, T., Tassinari, H., & Landy, M. (2010) · PLoS Comput. Biol. · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000982 · Cited by 25
“the direction of previous errors, and proportional to prior error extents [5,6,7].”
Backgroundvan Soest, A. J., Casius, L. J. R., de Kok, W., Krijger, M., Meeder, M., & Beek, P. J. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0016890 · Cited by 28
Scheidt, R. A., Lillis, K. P., & Emerson, S. J. (2010) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2308-1 · Cited by 29
“1995), as well as from ‘‘efference copy’’ and a forward model of the limb and its environment (Wolpert et al. 1995a; Nelson 1996; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Gritsenko et al. 2007).”
Environmental constraints modify the way an interceptive action is controlled
Morice, A. H. P., François, M., Jacobs, D. M., & Montagne, G. (2010) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2147-0 · Cited by 25
“…however, no purely predictive strategies have been proposed for the interception of moving targets on foot, which should not lead one to discard the possibility that predictive information is used as part of an on-line regulation process (cf., Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Starkes et al. 2002).”
Hill, H. (2009) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1821-6 · Cited by 25
“In ongoing movements feedforward control and external and internal feedback control should interact to achieve the movement goal (e.g., Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundSosnoff, J. J., Jordan, K., & Newell, K. M. (2005) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0009-y · Cited by 23
“The digit individuation affords compensatory control through faster timescale feedback processes and this leads to reduced variability (Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundWhitwell, R. L., Goodale, M. A., Merritt, K. E., & Enns, J. T. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.013 · Cited by 29
“…and feedbackcoupled processes that minimize error and movement variability and are already ascribed to the dorsal sensorimotor system (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Flanagan & Beltzner, 2000; Whitwell, Ganel, Caitline, & Coodale, 2015; Whitwell, Milner, Cavina-Pratesi, Barat, & Goodale, 2015;…”
Reichenbach, A., Bresciani, J., Bülthoff, H., & Thielscher, A. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.043 · Cited by 25
“During goal-directed movements, sensory information is continuously integrated into themotor plan in order to ensure and improve execution success (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Shadmehr et al., 2010; Wolpert et al., 1995).”
Dexheimer, B., Przybyla, A., Murphy, T., Akpinar, S., & Sainburg, R. (2022) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-022-06451-2 · Cited by 24
“The final position error was defined as the 2-D Euclidean distance from the final cursor location to the center of the target at movement offset and provides information on online error corrective mechanisms (Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundA kinematic and EMG dataset of online adjustment of reach-to-grasp movements to visual perturbations
Furmanek, M. P., Mangalam, M., Yarossi, M., Lockwood, K., & Tunik, E. (2022) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-021-01107-2 · Cited by 24
Si, R., Rowe, J., & Zhang, J.-X. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.11.27.401208 · Cited by 24
Niechwiej-Szwedo, E., Meier, K., Christian, L. W. T., Nouredanesh, M., Tung, J., Bryden, P., & Giaschi, D. (2020) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.21931 · Cited by 24
A systematic evaluation of the evidence for perceptual control theory in tracking studies
Parker, M. G., Willett, A. B. S., Tyson, S. F., Weightman, A., & Mansell, W. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.02.030 · Cited by 27
An Adapting Auditory-motor Feedback Loop Can Contribute to Generating Vocal Repetition
Wittenbach, J. D., Bouchard, K. E., Brainard, M. S., & Jin, D. Z. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004471 · Cited by 25
“For motor control with continuous trajectories, such as reaching movements or articulation of single speech phonemes, it has been proposed that internal models estimate sensory consequences of motor commands, compare these estimates to actual sensory feedback, and use the difference as error signals to correct ongoing…”
BackgroundAging and limb alter the neuromuscular control of goal-directed movements
Kwon, M., Chen, Y.-T., Fox, E., & Christou, E. (2014) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-014-3868-2 · Cited by 24
Evolution of a predictive internal model in an embodied and situated agent
Gigliotta, O., Pezzulo, G., & Nolfi, S. (2011) · Theory in Biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12064-011-0128-x · Cited by 19
“Moreover, there is a vast literature that show how prediction and internal models play an important role in (visuo)motor control (Kawato 1999; Miall and Wolpert 1996) and in the stabilization of perception (von Holst and Mittelstaedt 1950), allow to circumvent the problems caused by the delay with which sensory inform…”
BackgroundResolving some confusions over attention and consciousness
Taylor, J. G., & Fragopanagos, N. (2007) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2007.09.007 · Cited by 20
Eye movements during rapid pointing under risk
Stritzke, M., & Trommershäuser, J. (2007) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.04.013 · Cited by 20
Tunik, E., Schmitt, P. J., & Grafton, S. T. (2007) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00405.2006 · Cited by 24
“This information may then be used by the cerebellum to better predict or update the motor plan on subsequent trials, thus leading to trial-to-trial adaptation (Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
MethodSelf-citationPrediction in the Vestibular Control of Arm Movements.
Blouin, J., Bresciani, J., Guillaud, E., & Simoneau, M. (2015) · Multisensory Research · doi:10.1163/22134808-00002501 · Cited by 24
Agency in Schizophrenia from a Control Theory Viewpoint
Proust, J. (2006) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2457.003.0006 · Cited by 21
Galletti, C., Gamberini, M., & Fattori, P. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104823 · Cited by 26
“, 2009, 2011, 2020), we suggest it compares these two inputs, thus acting as a state estimator of the arm/hand movement (Kawato, 1999; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Shadmehr and Krakauer, 2008; Grafton, 2010; Shadmehr et al., 2010; Fattori et al., 2017).”
BackgroundA neural noise account of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome
Münchau, A. M., Colzato, L. S., AghajaniAfjedi, A., & Beste, C. (2021) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102654 · Cited by 28
Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension
Grant, S., & Conway, M. L. (2019) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-019-05503-4 · Cited by 23
“There is continuing debate over the extent to which such goal-directed hand movements are programmed in advance or controlled online (Jeannerod 1984; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Elliot et al.”
BackgroundAction representations in robotics: A taxonomy and systematic classification
Zech, P., Renaudo, E., Haller-Seeber, S., Zhang, X., & Piater, J. (2019) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364919835020 · Cited by 18
“The resulting model would be complex which does not fit with the results on how fast and adaptable the action decision-making process actually is (Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundPosterior parietal cortex evaluates visuoproprioceptive congruence based on brief visual information
Limanowski, J., & Blankenburg, F. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16848-7 · Cited by 23
Hyde, C. E., Wilmut, K., Fuelscher, I. T., & Williams, J. (2013) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.2013.785927 · Cited by 19
“Computational modeling in recent decades has consistently argued for the importance of accurate internal representations of movement to the efficient online monitoring and control of action (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Izawa & Shadmehr, 2011; Shadmehr & Krakauer, 2008; Wolpert et al., 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialEEG correlates of Fitts’s law during preparation for action
Kourtis, D., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2012) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-012-0418-z · Cited by 26
“The present results are in line with the notion of hybrid internal models of action, which postulate the formation of a ‘‘crude’’ motor plan before action onset, which gets constantly updated through feedback loops during movement execution (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAltered sense of Agency in children with spastic cerebral palsy
Ritterband-Rosenbaum, A., Christensen, M., Kliim-Due, M., Petersen, L. Z., Rasmussen, B., & Nielsen, J. (2011) · BMC Neurology · doi:10.1186/1471-2377-11-150 · Cited by 23
“movements performed by the healthy adults and to some extend also by the healthy children suggests that they utilized well-learned feed-forward motor programs, whereas the slow unsteady movements performed by the CP children suggests that they were forced to use a feedback strategy in which the movement had to be corr…”
Fautrelle, L., Pichat, C., Ricolfi, F., Peyrin, C., & Bonnetblanc, F. (2011) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.06.034 · Cited by 23
Muscular synergies during motor corrections: investigation of the latencies of muscle activities.
Fautrelle, L., Ballay, Y., & Bonnetblanc, F. (2010) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.06.015 · Cited by 23
A Simple and Accurate onset Detection Method for a Measured Bell-shaped Speed Profile
Botzer, L., & Karniel, A. (2009) · Front. Neuropro. · doi:10.3389/neuro.20.002.2009 · Cited by 23
“However, there is mounting evidence that practical reaching movements are also infl uenced by the feedback (Botzer and Karniel, 2008; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Ma-Wyatt and McKee, 2007; Saunders and Knill, 2003, 2005).”
Sensorimotor mapping affects movement correction deficits in early Huntington’s disease
Lemay, M., Fimbel, E., Beuter, A., Chouinard, S., & Richer, F. (2005) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-005-2315-9 · Cited by 23
“It could be proposed that because of deficient forward modeling, patients rely more extensively on closed-loop monitoring, making the correction longer and possibly more variable (Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGagnon, D., Koontz, A., Brindle, E., Boninger, M., & Cooper, R. (2009) · Journal of rehabilitation research and development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2009.02.0012 · Cited by 23
“Such a model may allow the central nervous system to adequately preplan and calibrate the force production (muscle activity) required for an individual with SCI to perform SPTs in both directions, even before motiondependent feedback becomes available, suggesting a feed-forward control strategy [19].”
Assessment of human expertise and movement kinematics in first-person shooter games
Donovan, I., Saul, M. A., DeSimone, K., Listman, J. B., Mackey, W. E., & Heeger, D. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.979293 · Cited by 30
“Protocols for measuring such ballistic kinematics are well established, and have been applied in a broad range of cognitive and visuomotor tasks (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundKim, H., Kim, J.-H., Jo, S., Lee, K., Kim, J., & Song, C. (2022) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-022-11410-6 · Cited by 23
“An unimpaired reach-to-grasp movement is characterized by high temporal efficiency given the pre-planning and execution of the movements [12, 48].”
BackgroundControl strategies for rapid, visually guided adjustments of the foot during continuous walking
Barton, S. L., Matthis, J., & Fajen, B. (2019) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-019-05538-7 · Cited by 22
Pacherie, E. (2018) · Understanding Merleau-Ponty, Understanding Modernism · doi:10.5040/9781501302701.0041 · Cited by 22
“…motor system to estimate the effects of the motor commands sent to the effectors, compare these predicted effects with sensory feedback, and make adjustments if needed (for full descriptions of these models, see Desmurget & Grafton 2000; Wolpert, Ghahramani & Jordan 1995; Wolpert & Kawato 1998).”
BackgroundFloegel, M., & Kell, C. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185152 · Cited by 22
Billington, J., Wilkie, R., & Wann, J. (2013) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00009 · Cited by 22
“Desmurget and Grafton (2000) implicate both the IPS and the cerebellum as key regions for making feedback strategies viable processes for fast effective motor responses.”
BackgroundBangert, A., Abrams, R., & Balota, D. (2012) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0234-x · Cited by 22
“While it is possible that these influences primarily impact the initial motor program, some feedforward models of reaching suggest that feedback processes influence the integration of sensory and motor information during ongoing movements (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000 ).”
Movement curvature planning through force field internal models
Petresкa, B., & Billard, A. (2009) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-009-0300-2 · Cited by 15
“This is achieved by integrating delayed sensory input and motor output through afferent and efferent internal feedback loops (Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialAnticipations, Brains, Individual and Social Behavior: An Introduction to Anticipatory Systems
Butz, M. V., Sigaud, O., Pezzulo, G., & Baldassarre, G. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74262-3_1 · Cited by 24
“Behavioral experiments and simulations confirm that humans must use forward model information to stabilize behavioral control [21, 61].”
MethodThe Evolution of Cognition — From First Order to Second Order Embodiment
Schilling, M., & Cruse, H. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79037-2_5 · Cited by 20
“by a forward model [33,34] because forward models could be used to determine spatial location when joint angles are given.”
MethodIntermittency of Visual Information and the Frequency of Rhythmical Force Production
Sosnoff, J., & Newell, K. (2005) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.3200/jmbr.37.4.325-336 · Cited by 22
“An alternative perspective is that visuomotor processing is composed of multiple processes that operate on unique timescales (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Sosnoff & Newell, in press), as revealed in the frequency structure of the force output.”
BackgroundTesting models of attention with MEG
Ioannides, A. A., & Taylor, J. G. (2003) · Proceedings of ... International Joint Conference on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2003.1223359 · Cited by 22
Schenk, T., & Hesse, C. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.05.014 · Cited by 25
“Currently, the prevailing assumption is that feedback and feedforward control are combined in a forward model (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Miall & Wolpert, 1996).”
Shanechi, M. M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71976-4_8 · Cited by 2
Herbort, O., Butz, M. V., & Pedersen, G. K. M. (2009) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-05181-4_5 · Cited by 18
“Multiple sources of information are integrated when forming goals or during the control of ongoing movements [18, 47].”
BackgroundTapping on a target: dealing with uncertainty about its position and motion
Brenner, E., de la Malla, C., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2022) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-022-06503-7 · Cited by 24
“Moreover, when guiding the arm to a certain point one could benefit from efferent signals to overcome some of the sensorimotor delays that are encountered when dealing with visual or haptic feedback about the arm (Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Pickering and Clark 2014).”
BackgroundReach-relevant somatosensory signals modulate activity in the tactile suppression network
Arikan, B. E., Voudouris, D., Voudouri-Gertz, H., Sommer, J. B., & Fiehler, K. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118000 · Cited by 24
Design and Validation of a Virtual Player for Studying Interpersonal Coordination in the Mirror Game
Zhai, C., Alderisio, F., Słowiński, P., Tsaneva-Atanasova, K., & di Bernardo, M. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2017.2671456 · Cited by 21
“Specifically, the motor system is able to correct the deviation from the desired movement with the aid of feedback control, whilst feedforward control allows it to reconcile the interdependency of the involved effectors and preplan the response to the sensory incoming information [12]–[14].”
BackgroundStewart, J., Gordon, J., & Winstein, C. (2014) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-014-4025-7 · Cited by 21
Ruddock, S., Hyde, C., Piek, J., Sugden, D., Morris, S., & Wilson, P. (2014) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565641.2013.855215 · Cited by 21
“Computationally, since the target remains stationary throughout the movement; discrepancy between the expected (according to the predictive model) and actual consequences of action is minimal, assuming that the initial motor command is accurate (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundRonchi, R., Revol, P., Katayama, M., Rossetti, Y., & Farnè, A. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021070 · Cited by 20
The dual role of vision in sequential aiming movements.
Khan, M. A., Sarteep, S., Mottram, T. M., Lawrence, G. P., & Adam, J. (2011) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.010 · Cited by 21
Representational momentum for the human body: Awkwardness matters, experience does not
Wilson, M., Lancaster, J., & Emmorey, K. D. (2010) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.006 · Cited by 23
“…the prediction of human movement can tap into internal models of the body, including hierarchical limb structure, the dynamics of muscles, limitations on joint angles, and the forces involved in movement control (e.g. Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Ito, 2008; Kawato, 1999; Wolpert & Flanagan, 2001).”
Stability of motor representations after paralysis
Guan, C., Aflalo, T., Zhang, C. Y., Amoruso, E., Rosario, E. R., Pouratian, N., & Andersen, R. A. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.74478 · Cited by 23
“In this study, we recorded from the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), which is thought to compute an internal forward model for sensorimotor control (Mulliken et al., 2008; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Li et al., 2022).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNeuronal representation of saccadic error in macaque posterior parietal cortex (PPC)
Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., Lu, H. D., Wu, S., & Zhang, M. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.10912 · Cited by 26
“Recent studies have shown that comparison between motor intention and proprioception is critical for motor learning (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Panouilleres et al., 2015; Wolpert et al., 2011; Wolpert and Ghahramani, 2000) and motor-related cognitive functions, such as motor awareness (Berti and…”
BackgroundArzi, H., Krasovsky, T., Pritsch, M., & Liebermann, D. G. (2013) · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.021 · Cited by 21
Selection and coordination of articulatory gestures in temporally constrained production
Tilsen, S. (2014) · J. Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2013.12.004 · Cited by 20
Predictive error detection in pianists: a combined ERP and motion capture study
Maidhof, C. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00587 · Cited by 19
“The forward model can predict the sensory consequences of an action by integrating information about the current state of the system and this efference copy (Wolpert et al., 1995; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundFautrelle, L., & Bonnetblanc, F. (2012) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2012.07.005 · Cited by 20
Thaler, L., & Todd, J. T. (2009) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.12.038 · Cited by 18
“In summary, the literature regarding peripheral and entral visuo-motor processes reveals a complex picture ith many seemingly discrepant findings (for more comlete reviews see Desmurget et al., 1998; Lacquaniti and aminiti, 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Todorov, 004).”
BackgroundError processing during online motor control depends on the response accuracy.
Galléa, C., de Graaf, J. D., Pailhous, J., & Bonnard, M. (2008) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.05.014 · Cited by 20
Antezedente Effektrepräsentationen in der Verhaltenssteuerung
Kunde, W. (2006) · Psychologische Rundschau · doi:10.1026/0033-3042.57.1.34 · Cited by 24
Woch, A., & Plamondon, R. (2010) · Motor Control · doi:10.1123/mcj.14.1.1 · Cited by 20
Tutorial Review of Bio-Inspired Approaches to Robotic Manipulation for Space Debris Salvage
Ellery, A. A. (2020) · Biomimetics · doi:10.3390/biomimetics5020019 · Cited by 22
“, sensory feedback is essential for the forward model [86].”
BackgroundErrors in Imagined and Executed Typing
Dahm, S., & Rieger, M. (2019) · Vision · doi:10.3390/vision3040066 · Cited by 19
“This enables the detection of potential action errors even before an action is executed [20], and can modulate the motor command [21].”
BackgroundAllsop, J. E., Lawrence, G. P., Gray, R. C., & Khan, M. A. (2016) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-016-0791-0 · Cited by 22
“…based on the environmental and task demands of the situation, along with the positions of the performer's body (Glover, 2004), and depends on feedforward processes involving discrepancies between predicted and actual sensory consequences (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Wolpert, Miall, & Kawato, 1998).”
BackgroundKimura, D., Kadota, K., & Kinoshita, H. (2015) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2015.00182 · Cited by 18
“For creating a TJR within a short latency, the current hand position is estimated by comparing sensory feedback with forward model predictions to minimize delay times associated with the sensory feedback loop (Kawato, 1999; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Sabes, 2000).”
BackgroundMethodMechanisms for Robust Cognition
Walsh, M. M., & Gluck, K. A. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12192 · Cited by 15
“This is done using sensory (e.g., visual and prioceptive) and non-sensory (e.g., efferent motor commands) information (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Todorov, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodMotor imagery: lessons learned in movement science might be applicable for spaceflight
Bock, O., Schott, N., & Papaxanthis, C. (2015) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00075 · Cited by 19
“…refine future motor commands by generating an internal training signal that modifies plastic neural processes (Wolpert et al., 1995; Kawato, 1999; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000) and the same may hold during MP as well, only that the training signal may be less accurate and precise due to the lack…”
BackgroundKim, K. S., & Max, L. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00911 · Cited by 19
“Current models of sensorimotor control suggest that movements are executed through a combination of feedforward and feedback control mechanisms (Kawato and Wolpert, 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Wolpert and Flanagan, 2001, 2010).”
Dorsal Parietal Area 5 Encodes Immediate Reach in Sequential Arm Movements
Li, Y.-H., & Cui, H. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1162-13.2013 · Cited by 19
Wasaka, T., & Kakigi, R. (2012) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-13-138 · Cited by 22
“It has been suggested that a copy of the motor signal, known as an efference copy, is created so that sensory signals generated from external stimuli can be distinguished from reafferent signals from body movement [2,35,36].”
BackgroundFrom Humans to Humanoids: the Optimal Control Framework
Ivaldi, S., Sigaud, O., Berret, B., & Nori, F. (2012) · Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics · doi:10.2478/s13230-012-0022-3 · Cited by 27
“feedforward motor commands [40, 41, 51, 169, 175], and their adaptation to changing environments [33, 71] have suggested “cues” of optimality principles in sensori-motor control.”
BackgroundGiboin, L., Lackmy-Vallée, A., Burke, D., & Marchand-Pauvert, V. (2012) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00774.2011 · Cited by 19
“There is considerable literature, based on kinematic analyses, visual and proprioceptive processing, brain imaging, and TMS, supporting an internal model for fast reaching movements, with a feedforward component (motor planning) and a feedback component (sensory processing; Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundAiming for the future: prospective action difficulty, prescribed difficulty, and Fitts’ law
Slifkin, A., & Grilli, S. M. (2006) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0518-3 · Cited by 19
“Such mental simulation may operate according to the details of an internal model for actual action (e.g., Kawato 1999; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Wolpert and Flanagan 2001; Blakemore et al. 2002), but with the actual output inhibited (Schwoebel et al. 2002).”
BackgroundPrediction Precedes Control in Motor Learning
Flanagan, J. R., Vetter, P., Johansson, R. S., & Wolpert, D. M. (2003) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00007-1 · Cited by 515
Lee, Y.-J., Liang, J.-N., Chen, B., & Aruin, A. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53379-9 · Cited by 18
Foster, N. C., Bennett, S. J., Causer, J., Elliott, D., Bird, G., & Hayes, S. J. (2019) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.2214 · Cited by 24
“…and control of muscular forces required to generate (i.e., an inverse model, see Wolpert & Kawato, 1998) and update (i.e., feedforward control; see Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Wolpert & Flanagan, 2010) the motor command for goal-directed movement [Glazebrook et al., 2006; Hughes, 1996; Mari,…”
BackgroundNobusako, S., Ishibashi, R., Takamura, Y., Oda, E., Tanigashira, Y., Kouno, M., Tominaga, T., Ishibashi, Y., Okuno, H., Nobusako, K., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00709 · Cited by 20
Noninvasive EEG correlates of overground and stair walking
Brantley, J. A., Luu, T., Ozdemir, R., Zhu, F., Winslow, A. T., Huang, H., & Contreras-Vidal, J. (2016) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · doi:10.1109/embc.2016.7592028 · Cited by 18
“The complex nature of dynamic walking leads to the idea that ambulation is driven by a combination of feed-forward and feedback signaling, simultaneously combining internal models and sensory feedback [17, 18].”
BackgroundLee, J., Kim, C.-Y., & Kim, H.-D. (2016) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000000454 · Cited by 35
“determining how the motor control or coordination of arm movements has changed.(30,31)”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grafton, Scott
- ORCID
- Grafton, Scott
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 423-431
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084145388
- Cited by
- 1,300
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 51
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Keywords
- forward model, sensorimotor delay, feedback control, reaching movements, motor planning, parietal lobe, cerebellum, motor control, mental time travel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review