The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements
Open accessAbstract
Delays in sensorimotor loops have led to the proposal that reaching movements are primarily under pre-programmed control and that sensory feedback loops exert an influence only at the very end of a trajectory. The present review challenges this view. Although behavioral data suggest that a motor plan is assembled prior to the onset of movement, more recent studies have indicated that this initial plan does not unfold unaltered, but is updated continuously by internal feedback loops. These loops rely on a forward model that integrates the sensory inflow and motor outflow to evaluate the consequence of the motor commands sent to a limb, such as the arm. In such a model, the probable position and velocity of an effector can be estimated with negligible delays and even predicted in advance, thus making feedback strategies possible for fast reaching movements. The parietal lobe and cerebellum appear to play a crucial role in this process. The ability of the motor system to estimate the future state of the limb might be an evolutionary substrate for mental operations that require an estimate of sequelae in the immediate future.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Mismatch detection and the forward model are involved in different aspects of motor execution: in motor control (for rapid online movement adaptation, for sensory attenuation), in motor learning (sensorimotor adaptation), but also for the sense of agency (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Blakemore and Sirigu, 2003; Jeannerod, 2009; Haggard, 2017; Dogge et al.,”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“Among these areas, the cerebellum is of particular interest and could be a comparator considering its unique architecture and connectivity (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Blakemore and Sirigu, 2003; Ito, 2006, 2008; Jeannerod, 2009; Tanaka et al., 2020; Figure 1).”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“The forward model integrates both the efference copy of the motor command and the sensory feedback to produce a prediction of the sensory consequences of the motor command.”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“On-line motor correction using the forward model would be faster than the processing time of using the sensory feedback alone.”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“It has thus been proposed that on-line motor control relies on a forward model.”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“These predictions are directly compared with the sensory feedback generated by the movement and thus provide an optimal estimate of the state of the effector; any discrepancy would be used to correct the on-going movement (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Tanaka et al., 2020).”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
Citations
Cites
An internal model for sensorimotor integration
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7569931 · Cited by 3,553
Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.
Kawato, M. (1999) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8 · Cited by 2,685
Das Reafferenzprinzip: Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie
von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950) · Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf00622503 · Cited by 2,655
Internal models in the cerebellum
Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01221-2 · Cited by 2,469
Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control
Miall, R. C., & Wolpert, D. M. (1996) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(96)00035-4 · Cited by 2,260
The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements
Duhamel, J.-R., Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1553535 · Cited by 1,966
THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT
Woodworth, R. S. (1899) · The Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0092992 · Cited by 1,747
Andersen, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C., & Xing, J. (1997) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.303 · Cited by 1,486
Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements.
Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C. E., & Keith Smith, J. E. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.3.340 · Cited by 1,406
Movement control in skilled motor performance.
Keele, S. W. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026739 · Cited by 1,176
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Keele, S.W. (1981) Behavioral analysis of movement. In Handbook of Physiology, Section 1: The Nervous System (Motor Control) (Vol. 2) (Brooks, W.B., ed.), pp. 1391–1414, Williams and Wilkins · DOI
- Arbib, M.A. (1981) Perceptual structures and distributed motor control. In Handbook of Physiology, Section 1: The Nervous System (Motor Control) (Vol. 2) (Brooks, W.B., ed.), pp. 1449–1480, Williams and Wilkins · DOI
- Jeannerod, M. (1988) The Neural and Behavioral Organization of Goal-Directed Movements, Clarendon Press
- Milner, 1992, A model for the generation of movements requiring endpoint precision, Neurosci., 49, 487, 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90113-G · DOI
- Pélisson, 1986, Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. II. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double step stimulus, Exp. Brain Res., 62, 303
- Gerdes, 1994, The use of internal representation in fast gold-directed movements: a modeling approach, Biol. Cybern., 70, 513, 10.1007/BF00198804 · DOI
- Paillard, J. (1982) The contribution of peripheral and central vision to visually guided reaching. In Analysis of Visual Behavior (Ingle,D.J. et al., eds), pp. 367–382, MIT Press
- Pelisson, 1995, Online compensation of gaze shifts perturbed by micro-stimulation of the superior colliculus in the cat with unrestrained head, Exp. Brain Res., 106, 196, 10.1007/BF00241115 · DOI
- Robinson, D. (1975) Oculomotor control signals. In Basic Mechanisms of Ocular Motility and their Clinical Implications (Lennerstrand, G. and Bach-y-Rita, P., eds), pp. 337–344, Pergamon Press
- Van Sonderen, 1989, Motor programs for goal-directed movements are continuously adjusted according to changes in target location, Exp. Brain Res., 78, 139, 10.1007/BF00230693 · DOI
- Gordon, 1994, Accuracy of planar reaching movements. 1. Independence of direction and extent variability, Exp. Brain Res., 99, 97, 10.1007/BF00241415 · DOI
- Vindras, 1998, Pointing errors reflect biases in the perception of the initial hand position, J. Neurophysiol., 79, 3290, 10.1152/jn.1998.79.6.3290 · DOI
- Prablanc, 1979, Optimal response of eye and hand motor system in pointing at visual target. I. Spatio-temporal characteristics of eye and hand movements and their relationships when varying the amount of visual information, Biol. Cybern., 35, 113, 10.1007/BF00337436 · DOI
- Desmurget, 1999, Functional anatomy of error correction during reaching movements in the dark, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 25, 787
- Inoue, 1998, PET study of pointing with visual feedback of moving hands, J. Neurophysiol., 79, 117, 10.1152/jn.1998.79.1.117 · DOI
- Kawato, 1987, A hierarchical neural-network model for control and learning of voluntary movement, Biol. Cybern., 57, 169, 10.1007/BF00364149 · DOI
- Johansson, 1984, Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when rougher or more slippery, Exp. Brain Res., 56, 550, 10.1007/BF00237997 · DOI
- Muller, 1994, Dyscoordination of pinch and lift forces during grasp in patients with cerebellar lesions, Exp. Brain Res., 101, 485, 10.1007/BF00227341 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,000
Motor skill experience modulates executive control for task switching
Yu, Q., Chan, C. C. H., Chau, B. K. H., & Fu, S. N. (2017) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.08.013 · Cited by 56
From the motor cortex to the movement and back again
Teka, W. W., Hamade, K. C., Barnett, W. H., Kim, T., Markin, S., Rybak, I., & Molkov, Y. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179288 · Cited by 50
Perri, R. L., Berchicci, M., Lucci, G., Spinelli, D., & Russo, F. D. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.040 · Cited by 45
“Considering the involvement of the PPC in the internal error detection (for a review see Desmurget and Grafton, 2000), we propose that posterior regions process the motor error by detecting the discrepancy between the executed and the expected action, as evoked by the stimulus features.”
Luque, N. R., Garrido, J. A., Carrillo, R. R., D'Angelo, E. U., & Ros, E. (2014) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2014.00097 · Cited by 46
“…architectures of the model (Figure 1) could generate fast convergence and stable outputs in the initial learning stages without the need for traditional feedback controllers widely used in robotic literature (Kawato and Gomi, 1992; Stroeve, 1997; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Kalveram et al., 2005).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe role of differential delays in integrating transient visual and proprioceptive information
Cameron, B. D., de la Malla, C., & López‐Moliner, J. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00050 · Cited by 48
“HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY ARTICLE published: 03 February 2014 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00050 The role of differential delays in integrating transient visual and proprioceptive information”
BackgroundInfluentialRoberts, E., Bain, P. G., Day, B. L., & Husain, M. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs219 · Cited by 52
“Although there is evidence to suggest that even rapid movements can be updated online through sensory feedback (Desmurget and Grafton 2000), it is thought that the control of ballistic movements is primarily governed by a predictive motor plan, known as a forward model (Miall and Wolpert 1996).”
BackgroundOgawa, K., & Inui, T. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1827 · Cited by 50
“From a computational perspective, internal state estimation is necessary for human motor control to compensate for inherent delays and noise in both efferent motor and afferent sensory signal pathways ( Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Wolpert & Ghahramani, 2000; Wolpert, 1997; Wolpert, Ghahramani, & Jordan, 1995).”
Desmurget, M., Turner, R. S., Prablanc, C., Russo, G. S., Alexander, G. E., & Grafton, S. T. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1510 · Cited by 45
“It has been suggested that the updated visual signal is used by the nervous system to adjust the ongoing hand trajectory (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000, 2003; Goodale, Pélisson, & Prablanc, 1986; Pélisson, Prablanc, Goodale, & Jeannerod, 1986; Prablanc & Martin, 1992; Prablanc et al., 1986).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationEbrahimiSani, S., Sohrabi, M., Taheri, H., Agdasi, M. T., & Amiri, S. (2020) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103768 · Cited by 58
Fuelscher, I. T., Williams, J., Enticott, P. G., & Hyde, C. E. (2015) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2015.07.027 · Cited by 48
“Indeed, were the latter the only feedback mechanism available, neural processing delays would render correction of movement in response to unexpected environmental changes slow and, subsequently, often inaccurate (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSingh, P., & Pradhan, B. (2013) · Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · doi:10.4103/0972-2327.112461 · Cited by 49
“However, m‐CIMT did not improve efficiency of movement execution (normalized movement time) or movement smoothness (normalized movement units) as it happens in conventional rehabilitation.[29]”
BackgroundThe role of gaze and road edge information during high-speed locomotion.
Kountouriotis, G. K., Floyd, R. C., Gardner, P. H., Merat, N., & Wilkie, R. M. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0026123 · Cited by 49
Maslovat, D., Brunke, K. M., Chua, R., & Franks, I. (2009) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.2009.10125923 · Cited by 49
“In reaching and grasping movements, feed-forward control has been incorporated into a forward model that predicts the behavior of the motor system, which can then be compared with the actual movement (see Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Wolpert, Ghahramani, & Flanagan, 2001).”
Birch, E., & Kelly, K. R. (2023) · Progress in retinal and eye research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2023.101168 · Cited by 48
Sylvie Chokron, A., & Dutton, G. N. (2022) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-022-02572-8 · Cited by 57
“In addition, there are feedback mechanisms that allow for correction of the movement during execution 1 3 (e.g., Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundBarhoun, P., Fuelscher, I., Kothe, E., He, J. L., Youssef, G., Enticott, P., Williams, J., & Hyde, C. (2019) · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.02.002 · Cited by 48
“Accordingly, forward models provide stability for the nervous system beyond that offered by relatively slow corticosensory processing (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
Transfer of Learned Manipulation following Changes in Degrees of Freedom
Fu, Q.-S., Hasan, Z., & Santello, M. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1143-11.2011 · Cited by 48
“It has been argued that motor control models that are solely based on planning (or feedback) mechanisms do not fully capture the process underlying sensorimotor control, but hybrid models combining both planning and feedback mechanisms are more representative of the actual process (Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundLearning feedback and feedforward control in a mirror-reversed visual environment.
Kasuga, S., Telgen, S., Ushiba, J., Nozaki, D., & Diedrichsen, J. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00096.2015 · Cited by 47
“Traditional theories have emphasized the existence of different controllers for feedforward and feedback control (Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Kawato 1999).”
A Neural Model of the Loss of Self in Schizophrenia
Taylor, J. G. (2010) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbq033 · Cited by 50
Postural adjustments for online corrections of arm movements in standing humans.
Leonard, J. A., Gritsenko, V., Ouckama, R., & Stapley, P. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00944.2010 · Cited by 47
The role of different submovement types during pointing to a target
Wisleder, D., & Dounskaia, N. (2006) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0603-7 · Cited by 47
“In particular, the necessity to reconsider the corrective submovement theory is supported by recent findings of other researchers that have addressed the issue of accuracy regulation from different perspectives (Bedard and Proteau 2004; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Khan and Franks 2003; Khan et al. 2003; Saunders and K…”
ResultNeural Models of Motor Speech Control
Guenther, F. H., & Hickok, G. S. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407794-2.00058-4 · Cited by 58
Recalibration in functional perceptual-motor tasks: A systematic review.
Brand, M., & de Oliveira, R. (2017) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2017.10.020 · Cited by 46
Predictive Simulation of Reaching Moving Targets Using Nonlinear Model Predictive Control
Mehrabi, N., Razavian, R. S., Ghannadi, B., & McPhee, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2016.00143 · Cited by 43
“This sensory information can be received from vision, proprioception, audition, the vestibular system, and internal models that can predict the motion (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialDelamare, W., Janssoone, T., Coutrix, C., & Nigay, L. (2016) · International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI) · doi:10.1145/2909132.2909260 · Cited by 40
“Indeed, models for the motor control of arm movements are actively discussed amongst researchers [7].”
BackgroundImplementation and experimental validation of Dynamic Movement Primitives for object handover
Prada, M., Remazeilles, A., Koene, A., & Endo, S. (2014) · 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros.2014.6942851 · Cited by 46
“This is considered as a limitation for our object handover application, where human behavior studies have shown that the transition in between the feedforward (or shape-driven) and the feedback (or goaldriven) strategies tends to occur at the middle of the reaching motion [5].”
BackgroundCasarotti, M., Lisi, M., Umiltà, C. A., & Zorzi, M. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00231 · Cited by 49
“…empirical evidence suggests that the brain integrates sensory and motor signals using such internal models to perform a variety of tasks, such as predicting sensory information and optimal motor control (Todorov, 2004; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Kawato, 1999; Wolpert, Ghahramani, & Jordan, 1995).”
BackgroundReach distance but not judgment error is associated with falls in older people.
Butler, A., Lord, S., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2011) · The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/glr071 · Cited by 46
“Is reaching risky?—In reaching for an object, the action is normally guided by an established forward internal model that relies on sensory information of the body’s state and the target location (34).”
BackgroundShared Representations as Coordination Tools for Interaction
Pezzulo, G. (2011) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-011-0060-5 · Cited by 46
“In addition to that, during action execution internal (forward) models could be adopted as well to adapt the motor plan to the fast dynamics of the environment, in the cases in which feedback is too slow (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Kawato, 1999).”
Coats, R. O., Bingham, G., & Mon-Williams, M. (2008) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1418-5 · Cited by 46
Gosselin-Kessiby, N., Messier, J., & Kalaska, J. (2008) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00980.2007 · Cited by 46
“…reported automatic on-line adjustments for hand spatial location and grip aperture (Bard et al. 1999; Connolly and Goodale 1999; Day and Lyon 2000; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Desmurget et al. 1999, 2001; Goodale et al. 1986; Grea et al. 2002; Pélisson et al. 1986; Prablanc and Martin 1992;…”
BackgroundHoffmann, J., Berner, M. P., Butz, M. V., Herbort, O., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Lenhard, A. (2007) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-007-0166-y · Cited by 54
“Adams 1971; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Schmidt 1975).”
BackgroundHyde, C., Fuelscher, I., Williams, J., Lum, J., He, J. L., Barhoun, P., & Enticott, P. G. (2018) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2017.11.009 · Cited by 46
Neural Correlates of State Estimation in Visually Guided Movements: an Event-Related FMRI Study
Ogawa, K., Inui, T., & Sugio, T. (2007) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70455-6 · Cited by 47
“This considerable delay prevents humans from using feedback information to control self-movement, and predictive movement control is required to compensate for the delay (Miall and Wolpert, 1996; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Wolpert and Flanagan, 2001).”
BackgroundSpecificity of Learning in a Video-Aiming Task: Modifying the Salience of Dynamic Visual Cues
Robin, C., Toussaint, L., Blandin, Y., & Proteau, L. (2005) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.3200/jmbr.37.5.367-376 · Cited by 45
Assessing motor imagery using the hand rotation task: does performance change across childhood?
Butson, M., Hyde, C., Steenbergen, B., & Williams, J. (2014) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2014.03.013 · Cited by 45
“…of movement are thought to play a critical role in a number of motor control processes, including mental rehearsal and observational learning (Jeannerod, 2001), motor planning (Wolpert & Ghahramani, 2000), and online movement control (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Izawa & Shadmehr, 2011).”
BackgroundGanushchak, L. Y., & Schiller, N. O. (2009) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00774.x · Cited by 39
“According to the action monitoring model, the action monitor is a feed-forward control mechanism that is used to inhibit and correct a faulty response (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Rodrı́guez-Fornells, Kurzbuch, &Münte, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodRuddock, S., Caeyenberghs, K., Piek, J. P., Sugden, D., Hyde, C. E., Morris, S., Rigoli, D., Steenbergen, B., & Wilson, P. H. (2016) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2016.08.001 · Cited by 38
“Where discrepancies arise, error signals are generated and relayed back to the controller to be integrated with the unfolding motor command, allowing for rapid adjustments to limb dynamics should they be necessary (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundMonjo, F., Terrier, R., & Forestier, N. (2015) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2015.09.006 · Cited by 54
The role of visual processing in motor learning and control: Insights from electroencephalography
Krigolson, O. E., Cheng, D. T., & Binsted, G. (2015) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2014.12.024 · Cited by 50
“Importantly, the timing of the N100 was similar to the minimum time believed to be required for feedback-reliant control processes (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Jeannerod, 1988; Keele & Posner, 1968; Paillard, 1996) and as such they concluded that the N100 may be related to the visual processing that…”
BackgroundInfluentialKim, C., Lee, J. S., Kim, H.-D., & Kim, J.-S. (2014) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.11.004 · Cited by 42
“Especially, the noteworthy findings were improvements in the torque generated by the knee extensor, ankle plantarflexor, and hip flexor muscles in this study, which have been correlated with gait performance [23].”
BackgroundKrüger, B., Bischoff, M., Blecker, C., Langhanns, C., Kindermann, S., Sauerbier, I., Reiser, M., Stark, R., Munzert, J., & Pilgramm, S. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.074 · Cited by 44
Fukui, T., & Inui, T. (2006) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2006.02.002 · Cited by 44
Cerebellar ataxia: quantitative assessment and cybernetic interpretation.
Sanguineti, V., Morasso, P., Baratto, L., Brichetto, G., Mancardi, G. L., & Solaro, C. (2003) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/s0167-9457(02)00159-8 · Cited by 44
The role of the cerebellum in adaptation: ALE meta‐analyses on sensory feedback error
Johnson, J. F., Belyk, M., Schwartze, M., Pinheiro, A. P., & Kotz, S. A. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24681 · Cited by 75
Laterality effects in motor learning by mental practice in right-handers
Gentili, R. J., & Papaxanthis, C. (2015) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.02.055 · Cited by 50
“During physical training, the estimated state of the motor system can be employed to refine future motor commands by generating an internal training signal that modifies plastic neural processes (Wolpert et al., 1995; Kawato, 1999; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
Feedback delays eliminate auditory-motor learning in speech production
Max, L., & Maffett, D. G. (2015) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2015.02.012 · Cited by 43
Linking cognitive and reaching trajectories via intermittent movement control
Friedman, J., Brown, S. D., & Finkbeiner, M. S. (2013) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2013.06.005 · Cited by 53
“All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2013.06.005 Miller, & Houk, 2007; Morasso, Casadio, Mohan, & Zenzeri, 2010; Morasso et al., 2010), although others dispute this point of view (see Desmurget and Grafton (2000) for a review).”
BackgroundInfluentialWatching Your Foot Move--An fMRI Study of Visuomotor Interactions during Foot Movement
Christensen, M. S., Lundbye‐Jensen, J., Petersen, N., Geertsen, S. S., Paulson, O. B., & Nielsen, J. B. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl101 · Cited by 46
“It has also been confirmed indirectly in behavioral studies that ECs are involved in movement error correction (Angel 1976; Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
Mind and consciousness: Towards a final answer?
TAYLOR, J. (2005) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2004.12.001 · Cited by 44
“The presence of corollary discharge in eye movem and many action processes is well recorded [30,35,85,108] .”
BackgroundResultInfluentialKim, K. S., Daliri, A., Flanagan, J., & Max, L. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.09.23.310797 · Cited by 42
“…that uses efference copy and an internal forward model in combination with afferent information and prior knowledge to best estimate the system state (e.g., Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Kawato, 1999; Krakauer & Mazzoni, 2011; Shadmehr et al., 2010; Wolpert & Miall, 1996; Wolpert & Flanagan, 2009).”
“Don׳t” versus “Won׳t”: Principles, mechanisms, and intention in action inhibition
Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & Braß, M. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.005 · Cited by 43
“Forward models serve to emulate actions by predicting the ensuing sensorimotor states (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000); a comparison between the predicted action effect and the desired state yields a prediction error that can be used to optimize the selection of those actions that are adequate for…”
van der Hoorn, A., Renken, R. J., Leenders, K. L., & de Jong, B. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095861 · Cited by 38
Temporal Analysis of Reference Frames in Parietal Cortex Area 5d during Reach Planning
Bremner, L. R., & Andersen, R. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2068-13.2014 · Cited by 42
“The brain is thought to generate such an internal forward model of the arm to reduce the instability in movements that would occur if the system relied solely on the relatively slow visual and proprioceptive signals from the periphery for feedback (Wolpert and Miall, 1996; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundTwo modes of error processing in reaching
Magescas, F., Urquizar, C., & Prablanc, C. (2008) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1629-9 · Cited by 39
“(Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundResultCompensatory properties of visual information in the control of isometric force
Hong, L. S., Brown, A. J., & Newell, K. (2008) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/pp.70.2.306 · Cited by 42
“Copyright 2008 Psychonomic Society, Inc. 306 At least since Woodworth (1899), there has been continued interest in the role that visual information plays in the control of human motor performance (cf. Carlton, 1992; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Elliott, 1990).”
BackgroundTowards a New Model of Verbal Monitoring
Gauvin, H. S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2020) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.81 · Cited by 48
Limanowski, J., Sarasso, P., & Blankenburg, F. (2018) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13824 · Cited by 33
Timing of goal-directed hitting: impact requirements change the information–movement coupling
Caljouw, S. R., van der Kamp, J., & Savelsbergh, G. J. P. (2004) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1705-0 · Cited by 40
Factors influencing variability in load forces in a tripod grasp
Baud-Bovy, G., & Soechting, J. F. (2002) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-001-0966-8 · Cited by 41
Cancelling cancellation? Sensorimotor control, agency, and prediction
Press, C., Thomas, E. R., & Yon, D. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.105012 · Cited by 41
“While it is rarely disputed that action control requires sensorimotor prediction (e.g., Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Kim et al., 2019; Hemed et al., 2020, 2022), the above emerging evidence suggests that the influence on perception is not necessarily attenuating.”
Auditory reafferences: the influence of real-time feedback on movement control
Kennel, C., Streese, L., Pizzera, A., Justen, C., Hohmann, T., & Raab, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00069 · Cited by 39
“Internal models simulate the consequence of an action (Miall and Wolpert, 1996; Wolpert and Flanagan, 2001) and stress the role of sensory feedback in motor control (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialKlingner, C., Volk, G., Brodoehl, S., Witte, O., & Guntinas-Lichius, O. (2014) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.08.011 · Cited by 40
“For the online control of actions, anticipatory control loops are suggested which predict the sensory feedback (forward modeling) due to a chosen motor program (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Shadmehr et al., 2010).”
Sensory feedback dependence hypothesis in persons who stutter.
Namasivayam, A., van Lieshout, P., Mcilroy, W., & de Nil, L. D. (2009) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2009.04.004 · Cited by 40
Short, F., & Ward, R. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/a0015873 · Cited by 40
Grierson, L., & Elliott, D. (2008) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2008.06.001 · Cited by 40
“…that is determined from this comparison is then used to modulate an inverse model, which amends the movement based on the expected next state and the desired final state of the performer (Davidson & Wolpert, 2005; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Miall & Wolpert, 1996; see also von Holst, 1954).”
MethodAccurate Reaching after Active But Not Passive Movements of the Hand: Evidence for Forward Modeling
Coslett, H. B., Buxbaum, L. J., & Schwoebel, J. (2008) · Behavioural Neurology · doi:10.1155/2008/972542 · Cited by 29
“[7,38]), these data strongly suggest that estimates of current hand location may be derived from efference copy signals and that this estimate may, in turn, play a role in the generation of accurate motor plans for reaching.”
BackgroundBipedal locomotion: toward unified concepts in robotics and neuroscience
Azevedo, C., Espiau, B., Amblard, B., & Assaiante, C. (2007) · Biological cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-006-0118-0 · Cited by 40
“Feedforward control (Desmurget and Grafton 2000) uses sensory information prior to the execution of movement, using an internal representation built up on the basis of previous experience.”
MethodThe distorted hand metric representation serves both perception and action
Peviani, V., & Bottini, G. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2018.1538154 · Cited by 39
“Generally, the starting point, which is the representation of the initial position of the body part involved in the movement, is computed through the integration of visual and proprioceptive information (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundMethodOnline adjustments of leg movements in healthy young and old
Potocanac, Z., & Duysens, J. (2017) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-017-4967-7 · Cited by 39
“…(Goodale and Milner 1992; Goodale and Haffenden 1998; Gréa et al. 2002; Milner et al. 2003), with a prominent role for the PPC (Desmurget et al. 1999; Pisella et al. 2000; Desmurget et al. 2001; Reichenbach et al. 2011; see Gaveau et al. 2014; Gomi 2008; Desmurget and Grafton 2000 for reviews).”
A cortical circuit for voluntary laryngeal control: Implications for the evolution language
Hickok, G. S. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1100-z · Cited by 42
“…parietal cortex (visuomotor) and temporal-parietal junction (auditory-motor) that serve a sensory feedback control function for motor coordination (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Diedrichsen et al., 2010; Fogassi et al., 2001; Golfinopoulos et al., 2011; Hickok, 2012; Houde&Nagarajan, 2011; Perkell,…”
Revealing humans’ sensorimotor functions with electrical cortical stimulation
Desmurget, M., & Sirigu, A. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0207 · Cited by 50
Self-citationSkilled forelimb movements and internal copy motor circuits
Azim, E., & Alstermark, B. (2015) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2014.12.009 · Cited by 37
Alcohol-induced suppression of BOLD activity during goal-directed visuomotor performance
Horn, J. D. V., Yanos, M., Schmitt, P. J., & Grafton, S. T. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.020 · Cited by 39
“These internal representations are essential for predicting the outcomes of movement and making needed online adjustments to maintain movement accuracy (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundSelf-citationProteau, L. (2005) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-004-2090-z · Cited by 38
“First, it tells us that the movement modulation observed in the target-only condition does not simply result from a comparison between the location of the target as determined by foveal and extra-foveal signals and the position of one’s hand as determined by either or both proprioceptive feedback and/or forward modeli…”
BackgroundA neurocomputational model of creative processes
Khalil, R., & Moustafa, A. A. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104656 · Cited by 49
“It is widely known that the cerebellum is essential in motor learning and control, particularly for the precise control of movements (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Garrido et al., 2013; Kalveram et al., 2005; Kawato and Gomi, 1992; Moustafa et al., 2013; Sergio et al., 2005; Stroeve, 1997).”
Wymbs, N. F., Nebel, M. B., Ewen, J. B., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa380 · Cited by 46
“2009; Wiestler and Diedrichsen 2013; Wymbs and Grafton 2015) and theory (Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Mostofsky and Ewen 2011) therefore suggest that the left IPL is important for the expression of forward action models, which contribute by means of rapid online correction during movement to avoid costly feedback-drive…”
BackgroundContributions of efference copy to limb localization: Evidence from deafferentation
Medina, J., Jax, S. A., Brown, M. J., & Coslett, H. B. (2010) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.063 · Cited by 27
“Current accounts of motor control posit that estimates of the position of the limb during movement are derived from both sensory feedback (primarily from vision and proprioception) and predicted from efference copy using a “forward model” (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Gritsenko et al., 2009).”
Prediction and embodiment in dialogue
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2009) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.663 · Cited by 58
Motor planning of locomotor adaptations on the basis of vision
Marigold, D. S., Andujar, J., Lajoie, K., & Drew, T. (2011) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53825-3.00011-5 · Cited by 40
Neuro-Behavioral Determinants of Interlimb Coordination
Swinnen, S., & Duysens, J. (2004) · Springer US · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9056-3 · Cited by 38
Nataraj, R., Sanford, S., Shah, A., & Liu, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00126 · Cited by 33
Desmurget, M., Richard, N., Beuriat, P.-A., Szathmári, A., Mottolèse, C., Duhamel, J., & Sirigu, A. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.08.027 · Cited by 47
Self-citationStewart, J., Gordon, J., & Winstein, C. (2014) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-014-3938-5 · Cited by 37
Dudschig, C., Lachmair, M., de la Vega, I., Filippis, M. D., & Kaup, B. (2012) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0201-9 · Cited by 37
“This might be because of the fact that the ballistic, preprogrammed, and purely executed part of the movement is predominant in a rather simple aiming task as the one implemented in the present experiment (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundMethodNiechwiej‐Szwedo, E., Goltz, H. C., Chandrakumar, M., & WONG, A. M. F. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031075 · Cited by 36
“During movement execution, visual and proprioceptive feedback are integrated with predictions generated from the internal model, which are used to update the motor plan to correct for errors in the initial motor command and/or unexpected perturbations [14,81,82,83].”
MethodAdaptation of motor behavior to preserve task success in the presence of muscle fatigue
Missenard, O., Mottet, D., & Perrey, S. (2009) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.062 · Cited by 46
“To cope with noise, successful motor behaviour benefits from anticipatory mechanisms in the CNS, which rely on internal models of the future outcome of a voluntary action (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundGagnon, D., Nadeau, S., Noreau, L., Eng, J., & Gravel, D. (2009) · Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology · doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.12.005 · Cited by 37
“Such a model would allow the central nervous system to adequately pre-plan muscle activity required to perform sitting pivot transfer before motiondependant feedback becomes available (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundThe evolution of cognition—a hypothesis
Cruse, H. (2003) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2701_5 · Cited by 37
Dynamic temporal modulation of somatosensory processing during reaching
Voudouris, D., & Fiehler, K. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81156-0 · Cited by 43
Rizzo, J., Hosseini, M., Wong, E. A., Mackey, W. E., Fung, J. K., Ahdoot, E., Rucker, J. C., Raghavan, P., Landy, M. S., & Hudson, T. E. (2017) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00227 · Cited by 45
“The cerebellum is then able to modulate the ongoing stream of motor commands to correct anticipated errors, either through connections to SMA, or via a more direct modulation of the descending motor pathway via the red nucleus (86).”
BackgroundBrain representations for acquiring and recalling visual–motor adaptations
Bédard, P., & Sanes, J. N. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.009 · Cited by 34
Wu, C.-Y., Wang, T.-N., Chen, Y.-T., Lin, K.-C., Chen, Y.-A., Li, H.-T., & Tsai, P.-L. (2013) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.2013.006486 · Cited by 36
“The CIT principle emphasizes massive practice of affected limbs, which induces more efficient preplanning of movements and, thus, reduces the reaction time in reaching to press the task target (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Wu, Chen, et al., 2007).”
Implicit Visuomotor Processing for Quick Online Reactions Is Robust against Aging
Kadota, K., & Gomi, H. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2599-09.2010 · Cited by 36
“For responses to target displacement, it has been suggested that the posterior parietal cortex is involved in the continuous error correction, in which a predictive forward model of the hand movement is computed (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
MethodMotoric Mechanisms for the Emergence of Non-local Phonological Patterns
Tilsen, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02143 · Cited by 35
Bruno, N., Uccelli, S., Viviani, E., & de'Sperati, C. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.022 · Cited by 35
“The task of precisely guiding the fingers near the appropriate contact points can be left to the slower second phase that can be controlled online based on sensory feedback or on feedforward predictive models (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Wolpert, 1997).”
BackgroundIllusion of agency in patients with Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome
Delorme, C., Salvador, A., Voon, V., Roze, E. F., Vidailhet, M., Hartmann, A., & Worbe, Y. (2016) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.02.003 · Cited by 42
“An action is felt as self-generated if the efference copy of a motor plan generated by a forward model matches the actual sensory effects of the action (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Kawato, 1999; Wolpert & Ghahramani, 2000).”
BackgroundPaying attention to consciousness
Taylor, J. G. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01890-9 · Cited by 77
Contribution of the cerebellum to predictive motor control and its evaluation in ataxic patients
Kakei, S., Lee, J., Mitoma, H., Tanaka, H., Manto, M., & Hampe, C. S. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00216 · Cited by 34
“The computation of a forward model contributes to predictive control in the presence of considerable delays in sensory feedback (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
The multisensory nature of human action imagery
Krüger, B., Hegele, M., & Rieger, M. (2022) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-022-01771-y · Cited by 41
“…carried out the movement along with the sensory consequences that the movement is likely to generate (sensory) predictions (Blakemore & Sirigu, 2003; Davidson & Wolpert, 2005; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Grush, 2004; Johansson & Flanagan, 2009; Wolpert & Fla-nagan, 2001; Wolpert & Miall, 1996).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grafton, Scott
- ORCID
- Grafton, Scott
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 423-431
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084145388
- Cited by
- 1,300
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 51
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Keywords
- forward model, sensorimotor delay, feedback control, reaching movements, motor planning, parietal lobe, cerebellum, motor control, mental time travel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review