The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements
Open accessAbstract
Delays in sensorimotor loops have led to the proposal that reaching movements are primarily under pre-programmed control and that sensory feedback loops exert an influence only at the very end of a trajectory. The present review challenges this view. Although behavioral data suggest that a motor plan is assembled prior to the onset of movement, more recent studies have indicated that this initial plan does not unfold unaltered, but is updated continuously by internal feedback loops. These loops rely on a forward model that integrates the sensory inflow and motor outflow to evaluate the consequence of the motor commands sent to a limb, such as the arm. In such a model, the probable position and velocity of an effector can be estimated with negligible delays and even predicted in advance, thus making feedback strategies possible for fast reaching movements. The parietal lobe and cerebellum appear to play a crucial role in this process. The ability of the motor system to estimate the future state of the limb might be an evolutionary substrate for mental operations that require an estimate of sequelae in the immediate future.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Mismatch detection and the forward model are involved in different aspects of motor execution: in motor control (for rapid online movement adaptation, for sensory attenuation), in motor learning (sensorimotor adaptation), but also for the sense of agency (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Blakemore and Sirigu, 2003; Jeannerod, 2009; Haggard, 2017; Dogge et al.,”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“Among these areas, the cerebellum is of particular interest and could be a comparator considering its unique architecture and connectivity (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Blakemore and Sirigu, 2003; Ito, 2006, 2008; Jeannerod, 2009; Tanaka et al., 2020; Figure 1).”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“The forward model integrates both the efference copy of the motor command and the sensory feedback to produce a prediction of the sensory consequences of the motor command.”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“On-line motor correction using the forward model would be faster than the processing time of using the sensory feedback alone.”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“It has thus been proposed that on-line motor control relies on a forward model.”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“These predictions are directly compared with the sensory feedback generated by the movement and thus provide an optimal estimate of the state of the effector; any discrepancy would be used to correct the on-going movement (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Tanaka et al., 2020).”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
Citations
Cites
An internal model for sensorimotor integration
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7569931 · Cited by 3,553
Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.
Kawato, M. (1999) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8 · Cited by 2,685
Das Reafferenzprinzip: Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie
von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950) · Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf00622503 · Cited by 2,655
Internal models in the cerebellum
Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01221-2 · Cited by 2,469
Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control
Miall, R. C., & Wolpert, D. M. (1996) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(96)00035-4 · Cited by 2,260
The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements
Duhamel, J.-R., Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1553535 · Cited by 1,966
THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT
Woodworth, R. S. (1899) · The Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0092992 · Cited by 1,747
Andersen, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C., & Xing, J. (1997) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.303 · Cited by 1,486
Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements.
Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C. E., & Keith Smith, J. E. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.3.340 · Cited by 1,406
Movement control in skilled motor performance.
Keele, S. W. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026739 · Cited by 1,176
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Keele, S.W. (1981) Behavioral analysis of movement. In Handbook of Physiology, Section 1: The Nervous System (Motor Control) (Vol. 2) (Brooks, W.B., ed.), pp. 1391–1414, Williams and Wilkins · DOI
- Arbib, M.A. (1981) Perceptual structures and distributed motor control. In Handbook of Physiology, Section 1: The Nervous System (Motor Control) (Vol. 2) (Brooks, W.B., ed.), pp. 1449–1480, Williams and Wilkins · DOI
- Jeannerod, M. (1988) The Neural and Behavioral Organization of Goal-Directed Movements, Clarendon Press
- Milner, 1992, A model for the generation of movements requiring endpoint precision, Neurosci., 49, 487, 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90113-G · DOI
- Pélisson, 1986, Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. II. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double step stimulus, Exp. Brain Res., 62, 303
- Gerdes, 1994, The use of internal representation in fast gold-directed movements: a modeling approach, Biol. Cybern., 70, 513, 10.1007/BF00198804 · DOI
- Paillard, J. (1982) The contribution of peripheral and central vision to visually guided reaching. In Analysis of Visual Behavior (Ingle,D.J. et al., eds), pp. 367–382, MIT Press
- Pelisson, 1995, Online compensation of gaze shifts perturbed by micro-stimulation of the superior colliculus in the cat with unrestrained head, Exp. Brain Res., 106, 196, 10.1007/BF00241115 · DOI
- Robinson, D. (1975) Oculomotor control signals. In Basic Mechanisms of Ocular Motility and their Clinical Implications (Lennerstrand, G. and Bach-y-Rita, P., eds), pp. 337–344, Pergamon Press
- Van Sonderen, 1989, Motor programs for goal-directed movements are continuously adjusted according to changes in target location, Exp. Brain Res., 78, 139, 10.1007/BF00230693 · DOI
- Gordon, 1994, Accuracy of planar reaching movements. 1. Independence of direction and extent variability, Exp. Brain Res., 99, 97, 10.1007/BF00241415 · DOI
- Vindras, 1998, Pointing errors reflect biases in the perception of the initial hand position, J. Neurophysiol., 79, 3290, 10.1152/jn.1998.79.6.3290 · DOI
- Prablanc, 1979, Optimal response of eye and hand motor system in pointing at visual target. I. Spatio-temporal characteristics of eye and hand movements and their relationships when varying the amount of visual information, Biol. Cybern., 35, 113, 10.1007/BF00337436 · DOI
- Desmurget, 1999, Functional anatomy of error correction during reaching movements in the dark, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 25, 787
- Inoue, 1998, PET study of pointing with visual feedback of moving hands, J. Neurophysiol., 79, 117, 10.1152/jn.1998.79.1.117 · DOI
- Kawato, 1987, A hierarchical neural-network model for control and learning of voluntary movement, Biol. Cybern., 57, 169, 10.1007/BF00364149 · DOI
- Johansson, 1984, Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when rougher or more slippery, Exp. Brain Res., 56, 550, 10.1007/BF00237997 · DOI
- Muller, 1994, Dyscoordination of pinch and lift forces during grasp in patients with cerebellar lesions, Exp. Brain Res., 101, 485, 10.1007/BF00227341 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Optimality principles in sensorimotor control
Todorov, E. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1309 · Cited by 1,746
“Although the distinction between open- and closed-loop control was traditionally seen as a dichotomy worth debating, researchers have increasingly realized that one is simply a special case of the othe”
BackgroundThe emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception
Grush, R. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000093 · Cited by 1,387
Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control
Scott, S. H. (2004) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1427 · Cited by 1,073
“The description above integrates feedback from the motor periphery into motor cortical function, but visual feedback is also important for volitional motor contro”
BackgroundConsensus Paper: The Cerebellum's Role in Movement and Cognition
Koziol, L. F., Budding, D. E., Andreasen, N. C., D’Arrigo, S., Bulgheroni, S., Imamizu, H., Ito, M., Manto, M. U., Marvel, C. L., Parker, K. L., et al. (2013) · The Cerebellum · doi:10.1007/s12311-013-0511-x · Cited by 1,193
“In this computational scheme, prediction (forward modeling) gives clear advantages in terms of compensation of noise and delay in sensory feedback, cancelation of self-generated stimuli, and better state estimation [189, 190].”
MethodThe Case for Motor Involvement in Perceiving Conspecifics.
Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.460 · Cited by 846
“For example, in the motor control literature, theorists have proposed that motor commands are fed into a simulation device, called a forward model, that runs in parallel with the actually executed movement (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Miall & Reckless, 2002; Wolpert & Flanagan, 2001).”
BackgroundComputational neuroanatomy of speech production
Hickok, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3158 · Cited by 837
“In addition to the parietal cortex, the cerebellum has long been implicated in internal models of motor control, including within the speech domain 18,40,76–79 , and the cerebellum has been specifically implicated as being part of a forward model 80,81 .”
Gazzola, V., & Keysers, C. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn181 · Cited by 740
The DIVA model: A neural theory of speech acquisition and production
Tourville, J. A., & Guenther, F. H. (2011) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960903498424 · Cited by 748
“Projections such as these, which predict the sensorimotor state resulting from a movement, are typically described as representing a forward model of the movement (e.g., Davidson & Wolpert, 2005; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Kawato, 1999; Miall & Wolpert, 1996).”
Computational Mechanisms of Sensorimotor Control
Franklin, D. W., & Wolpert, D. M. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.006 · Cited by 776
“Motor prediction, as instantiated by a forward model, is a key computational component that can alleviate this problem (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert and Kawato, 1998).”
BackgroundPerspectives and problems in motor learning
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01773-3 · Cited by 699
Movement intention after parietal cortex stimulation in humans
Desmurget, M., Reilly, K. T., Richard, N., Szathmari, A., Mottolese, C., & Sirigu, A. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1169896 · Cited by 695
Self-citationA Hierarchy of Time-Scales and the Brain
Kiebel, S. J., Daunizeau, J., & Friston, K. J. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000209 · Cited by 694
“The concept of ‘internal models’ which predict future sensory input due to the agent’s own action is a key element of many related theoretical accounts: for example, the ‘corollary discharge hypothesis’ [7], predictive coding [8,9], and motor control theory [10,11].”
Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action
Glover, S. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000020 · Cited by 669
“…planning and control stages of action has a long history (cf. Fitts 1957; Keele & Posner 1968; Meyer et al. 1988; Woodworth 1899), the planning–control model has several features that make it unique among these and other models of motor control (e.g., Arbib 1981; Desmurget & Grafton 2000; Jeannerod”
BackgroundMethodNeurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior
Ullsperger, M., Danielmeier, C., & Jocham, G. (2014) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2012 · Cited by 634
“and after the action, sequences of events reflecting these outcomes are predicted through learning and forward modeling processes (141, 190, 584).”
BackgroundNeural correlates of reach errors
Diedrichsen, J., Hashambhoy, Y., Rane, T., & Shadmehr, R. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1874-05.2005 · Cited by 622
“Therefore, errors signals play an important role to help the motor system smoothly correct movements (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
Buneo, C. A., & Andersen, R. A. (2005) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.011 · Cited by 620
Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension?
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002 · Cited by 633
Understanding complexity in the human brain
Bassett, D. S., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.006 · Cited by 572
“A better understanding of the sequence of selective pressures leading to these advantages will lead to an improved understanding of the functional role of a brain and its relationship to an information-rich environment.”
An action perspective on motor development.
Hofsten, C. V. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.002 · Cited by 529
The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection
Rushworth, M. F. S., Johansen‐Berg, H., Göbel, S. M., & Devlin, J. T. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.011 · Cited by 524
Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain
Grafton, S. T., & de C. Hamilton, A. F. (2007) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2007.05.009 · Cited by 503
“…between a sensory event and a motor response severely limit the use of feedback control (Keele, Cohen, & Ivry, 1990), newer behavioral work reveals mechanisms based on the integration of motor commands into estimation of state that can largely mitigate these delays (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEvidence for Multiple, Distinct Representations of the Human Body
Schwoebel, J., & Coslett, H. B. (2005) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/0898929053467587 · Cited by 462
“…sensory and efference copy information may be integrated to allow for the on-line correction of motor errors as well as to generate a more accurate estimate of body posture (e.g., Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Wolpert & Ghahramani, 2000; Desmurget et al., 1999; Wolpert, Ghahramani, & Jordan, 1995).”
BackgroundInteractions Between Posterior Gamma and Frontal Alpha/Beta Oscillations During Imagined Actions
de Lange, F. D., Jensen, O., Bauer, M., & Toni, I. (2008) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.09.007.2008 · Cited by 456
“The presence of a spatially, temporally, and functionally specifi c coupling between frontal and occipito-parietal regions during motor simulations provides support and electrophysiological constraints to computational models of action control that postulates the presence of feed-forward predictive mechanisms requirin…”
InfluentialGoal-directed aiming: Two components but multiple processes.
Elliott, D., Hansen, S., Grierson, L., Lyons, J., Bennett, S. J., & Hayes, S. J. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0020958 · Cited by 451
“More important from our perspective, an internal model of the expected sensory consequences of the movement provides a reference against which early visual and proprioceptive feedback can be compared (e.g., Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundEvidence for the Flexible Sensorimotor Strategies Predicted by Optimal Feedback Control
Liu, D., & Todorov, E. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1110-06.2007 · Cited by 447
“Perturbingthe targetofareachingmovementinanunpredictabledirectionhas beenaproductiveparadigmforinvestigatingthemechanismsof on-linevisuomotorcorrections(Pelissonetal.,1986;Prablanc andMartin,1992;DesmurgetandGrafton,2000).”
REVIEW: The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys
Grefkes, C., & Fink, G. R. (2005) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00426.x · Cited by 788
“MIP neurons are also considered to be part of a neural network that detects movement errors or position changes of a target so that fast movement corrections can occur (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Kalaska et al. 2003).”
BackgroundWhere's the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitive science
Engel, A. K., Maÿe, A., Kurthen, M., & Peter König, B. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.006 · Cited by 466
Action prediction in the cerebellum and in the parietal lobe
Blakemore, S.-J., & Sirigu, A. (2003) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1597-z · Cited by 381
“Forward models make predictions about the behaviour of the motor system and its sensory consequences (Wolpert et al. 1995; Wolpert and Flanagan 2001; Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundHumans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements
Saunders, J., & Knill, D. (2003) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1525-2 · Cited by 379
“The question of whether or not the human brain uses continuous visual feedback throughout reaching movements remains hotly debated (Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Angular Gyrus Computes Action Awareness Representations
Farrer, C., Frey, S. H., Horn, J. D. V., Tunik, E., Turk, D. J., Inati, S., & Grafton, S. T. (2007) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm050 · Cited by 386
Self-citationA parietal-premotor network for movement intention and motor awareness
Desmurget, M., & Sirigu, A. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.001 · Cited by 370
Self-citationForward models in visuomotor control.
Mehta, B., & Schaal, S. (2002) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2002.88.2.942 · Cited by 363
“Evidence for internal models in the brain has grown increasingly stronger (e.g., see Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Kawato 1999 for recent reviews).”
BackgroundResultThe essential role of Broca's area in imitation
Heiser, M., Iacoboni, M., Maeda, F., Marcus, J., & Mazziotta, J. C. (2003) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02530.x · Cited by 362
Disruption of state estimation in the human lateral cerebellum
Miall, R. C., Christensen, L. O. D., Cain, O., & Stanley, J. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050316 · Cited by 338
“of the cerebellum [7,12,13], and the cerebellum has been specifically linked to state estimation [14,15], possibly in conjunction with the superior parietal cortex [4,16–18].”
Altered awareness of voluntary action after damage to the parietal cortex
Sirigu, A., Daprati, E., Ciancia, S., Giraux, P., Nighoghossian, N., Posada, A., & Haggard, P. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1160 · Cited by 329
“Several studies suggest that the parietal cortex is important in activating and maintaining such internal model”
BackgroundEye–Hand Coordination during Learning of a Novel Visuomotor Task
Sailer, U., Flanagan, J., & Johansson, R. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2658-05.2005 · Cited by 313
“Mappings that can sup - port useful on - line corrections of hand trajectory based on pe - ripheral vision ( Desmurget and Grafton , 2000 ) might develop and help to eliminate errors gradually ( inappropriate hand coor - dination patterns ) and thereby contribute to the learning .”
BackgroundStatistical decision theory and the selection of rapid, goal-directed movements
Trommershäuser, J., Maloney, L. T., & Landy, M. S. (2003) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.20.001419 · Cited by 276
Max, L., Guenther, F. H., Gracco, V. L., Ghosh, S. S., & Wallace, M. (2004) · Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders · doi:10.1044/cicsd_31_s_105 · Cited by 289
“It is important to emphasize that the feedback controller integrates both afferent (sensory) and efferent signals (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Wolpert, Ghahramani, & Jordan, 1995; Wolpert, Miall, & Kawato, 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialLong-latency reflexes of the human arm reflect an internal model of limb dynamics.
Kurtzer, I. L., Pruszynski, J., & Scott, S. (2008) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.053 · Cited by 285
Feedforward and feedback processes in motor control
Seidler, R. D., Noll, D. C., & Thiers, G. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.003 · Cited by 280
“Optimal movement control likely reflects a combination of both feedback and feedforward processes (cf. Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundMethodAn expanded role for the dorsal auditory pathway in sensorimotor control and integration
Rauschecker, J. P. (2010) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2010.09.001 · Cited by 294
“Such models have been used to describe reaching movements or planning of movement trajectories using Kalman filters and Bayesian statistics for optimal state estimation (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Kawato, 1999; Sabes, 2000; Simon, 2006).”
Dynamics systems vs. optimal control — a unifying view
Schaal, S., Mohajerian, P., & Ijspeert, A. (2007) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(06)65027-9 · Cited by 260
“For the time being, the ‘‘desired trajectory’’ approach seems to be too restricted for general-purpose motor control and planning in dynamically changing environments, as needed in every biological motor system, and some biological evidence has been accumulated that completely preplanned desired trajectories may not e…”
BackgroundVerstynen, T., & Sabes, P. N. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6525-10.2011 · Cited by 227
“These measures are made 100 ms after movement onset, before feedback can affect the action (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundBody Schema in Robotics: A Review
Hoffmann, M., Marques, H. G., Arieta, A. H., Sumioka, H., Lungarella, M., & Pfeifer, R. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development · doi:10.1109/tamd.2010.2086454 · Cited by 253
“Such a model can also be used to improve closed-loop control: sensory feedback can be predicted in advance—before it is actually received—and control action can be adapted (see, e.g., [74]).”
BackgroundA Functional Taxonomy of Bottom-Up Sensory Feedback Processing for Motor Actions
Scott, S. H. (2016) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2016.06.001 · Cited by 274
Statistical decision theory and trade-offs in the control of motor response
Maloney, L. T., Landy, M. S., & Trommershäuser, J. (2003) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856803322467527 · Cited by 225
“It is clear that movement trajectories also depend on visual feedback (for reviews, see Connolly and Goodale, 1999; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
Beyond grasping: Representation of action in human anterior intraparietal sulcus
Tunik, E., Rice, N. J., Hamilton, A. F. D. C., & Grafton, S. T. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.026 · Cited by 228
“This function is highly reliant on the integrity of the parietal lobe and is an example of the establishment of an internal representation of an action, also referred to as an internal model by some investigators (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Sirigu et al., 1996; Wolpert et al., 1998).”
Self-citationA Mechanism for Error Detection in Speeded Response Time Tasks.
Holroyd, C. B., Yeung, N., COLES, M. G. H., & Cohen, J. D. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.163 · Cited by 227
“Comparators are common in the neurobiology of motor control literature (for reviews, see Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Kawato, 1999; Wolpert & Ghahramani, 2000).”
BackgroundHemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching.
Haaland, K., Prestopnik, J., Knight, R., & Lee, R. R. (2004) · Brain : a journal of neurology · doi:10.1093/brain/awh133 · Cited by 229
Motor Learning Without Doing: Trial-by-Trial Improvement in Motor Performance During Mental Training
Gentili, R. J., Han, C. E., Schweighofer, N., & Papaxanthis, C. (2010) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00257.2010 · Cited by 228
“During physical training, the estimated state of the motor system can refine future motor commands by generating an internal training signal that modifies plastic neural processes (Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Kawato 1999; Wolpert et al. 1995).”
BackgroundAn Optimality Principle Governing Human Walking
Arechavaleta, G., Laumond, J., Hicheur, H., & Berthoz, A. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2008.915449 · Cited by 220
“For instance, in [Desmurget and Grafton 2000] the authors propose an hybrid model for goal-directed movements in which both control schemes are integrated as a single control process.”
BackgroundNozari, N., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2011) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.05.001 · Cited by 261
“This so-called forward model (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Jordan & Rumelhart, 1992; Kawato, 1999; Miall & Wolpert, 1996), similar to the conflict-based model, uses the information generated by the production system (in this case, the motor system) for error detection rather than relying on the…”
Neurophysiological mechanisms involved in language learning in adults
Rodríguez‐Fornells, A., Toni Cunillera, B., Mestres-Missé, A., & de Diego‐Balaguer, R. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0130 · Cited by 220
“Using similar ideas as in feed-forward motor control models (Desmurget & Grafton 2000), this interface could allow the creation of an internal efference copy of the possible representation of the articulated word, which might be very useful to the language processing system for prediction purposes.”
MethodMental state inference using visual control parameters
Öztop, E., Wolpert, D. M., & Kawato, M. (2004) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.08.004 · Cited by 175
“The role of forward models in control is twofold: eliminating sensory processing delays [59,93] and mediating inverse model learning for establishing a feedforward control strategy [14].”
MethodFunctional Anatomy of Nonvisual Feedback Loops during Reaching: A Positron Emission Tomography Study
Desmurget, M., Gréa, H., Grethe, J., Prablanc, C., Alexander, G. E., & Grafton, S. T. (2001) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-08-02919.2001 · Cited by 218
“Functionally, it has been suggested that a major role of PPC in movement guidance is to determine whether and to what extent the current motor response is inadequate (Desmurget et al., 1999a; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationNeural Correlates of Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Review of Hypotheses
Zwicker, J. G., Missiuna, C. A., & Boyd, L. A. (2009) · Journal of Child Neurology · doi:10.1177/0883073809333537 · Cited by 183
“Deconinck et al(52) suggest that motor imagery in children with developmental coordination disorder may be based on poor forward feedback, which relies more on the cerebellum than on the parietal lobe.(58) It is possible that a broad network of regions associated with visuospatial processing is affected by development…”
BackgroundError awareness and the insula: links to neurological and psychiatric diseases
Klein, T. A., Ullsperger, M., & Danielmeier, C. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00014 · Cited by 210
“For example, a deviation of the motor efference copy and/or the proprioceptive and sensory feedback from predictions made in forward models of the action (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000) can indicate that the entire action is going to fail.”
BackgroundThree-Dimensional Transformations for Goal-Directed Action
Crawford, J. D., Henriques, D. Y. P., & Medendorp, W. P. (2011) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113749 · Cited by 180
“To avoid such delays and blind periods, the brain must derive a predictive representation of visual space from brief visual glimpses and copies of motor commands (Ariff et al. 2002, Desmurget & Grafton 2000, Mehta & Schaal 2002, Wolpert & Ghahramani 2000).”
Forward estimation of movement state in posterior parietal cortex
Mulliken, G. H., Musallam, S., & Andersen, R. A. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0802602105 · Cited by 219
“Rapid online control of movement cannot rely completely on slow sensory feedback but instead must make continuous adjustments to motor commands based on a best estimate of the current and future states of the effector (7, 8).”
Time Course of Error Detection and Correction in Humans: Neurophysiological Evidence
Rodríguez‐Fornells, A., Kurzbuch, A. R., & Münte, T. F. (2002) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-22-09990.2002 · Cited by 192
“This mechanism compares an internal goal with the predicted consequences of the ongoing movement, made available through the efference copy (Shadmehr and Mussa-Ivaldi, 1994; Wolpert et al., 1995; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000) (see Fig.”
BackgroundShared Internal Models for Feedforward and Feedback Control
Wagner, M. J., & Smith, M. A. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5479-07.2008 · Cited by 200
“…past motor commands and delayed sensory feedback (Flanagan et al., 2003, Blakemore et al., 1999; Duhamel et al., 1992; Jordan and Rumelhart, 1992; Wolpert and Miall, 1996; Bhushan and Shadmehr, 1999; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Ariff et al., 2002; Mehta and Schaal, 2002; Sommer and Wurtz, 2002).”
BackgroundMental motor imagery and the body schema: evidence for proprioceptive dominance.
Shenton, J., Schwoebel, J., & Coslett, H. (2004) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2004.07.053 · Cited by 202
Specialization of reach function in human posterior parietal cortex
Vesia, M., & Crawford, J. D. (2012) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3158-9 · Cited by 191
“To monitor the performance of a reach, the brain needs to predict the consequences of its motor commands prior to their execution (Wolpert 1997; Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundThe sense of agency: A philosophical and empirical review of the “Who” system
de Vignemont, F., & Fourneret, P. (2003) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/s1053-8100(03)00022-9 · Cited by 203
“Indeed, they do not have the same causal history nor do they have the same epistemic status.”
BackgroundSelective Activation of a Parietofrontal Circuit during Implicitly Imagined Prehension
Johnson, S. C. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1265 · Cited by 188
“The area proposed here as homologous to monkey MIP is virtually identical to a location previously shown to be involved in the modification of unfolding reaching plans on the basis of sensory feedback (Desmurget et al., 1999; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
Self-citationGetting ahead: forward models and their place in cognitive architecture
Pickering, M. J., & Clark, A. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.006 · Cited by 190
Khan, M. A., Franks, I., Elliott, D., Lawrence, G. P., Chua, R., Bernier, P., Hansen, S., & Weeks, D. (2006) · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.05.002 · Cited by 185
Della‐Maggiore, V., Malfait, N., Ostry, D. J., & Paus, T. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2833-04.2004 · Cited by 181
“Participants successfully correct their hand paths to the updated target location with latencies as short as 110 msec (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
MethodAndersen, R. A., Hwang, E. J., & Mulliken, G. H. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100503 · Cited by 244
The architecture of speech production and the role of the phoneme in speech processing
Hickok, G. S. (2013) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.834370 · Cited by 204
“…associated with a coarse motor plan, while somatosensory input fine-tunes a particular implementation of the movement (there are many degrees of freedom) on a more local level given the current context (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000), which can vary with limb position, loads, fatigue and other factors.”
BackgroundComputational Motor Control: Redundancy and Invariance
Guigon, E., Baraduc, P., & Desmurget, M. (2006) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00290.2006 · Cited by 239
“Because it is well recognized that motor commands are continuously updated by internal feedback loops (review in Desmurget and Grafton 2000), it has been suggested that on-line control of movement is also optimal in the theoretical sense (optimal feedback control; Bryson and Ho 1975; Hoff and Arbib…”
BackgroundSelf-citationHatsopoulos, N. G., & Suminski, A. J. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.020 · Cited by 179
Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Braß, M. (2015) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2015.02.003 · Cited by 191
“…model relates the prepared motor commands to the sensory signals of the actual state of the effectors to predict the sensorimotor state that will result from the action; the estimated and actual sensorimotor states can be compared to refine future motor commands (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
Sergio, L., & Kalaska, J. (2003) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00016.2002 · Cited by 170
“These findings are also consistent with evidence that the earliest part of the motor output signal is only an approximation of the exact motor command needed to successfully perform an action (Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Ghilardi et al. 1995; Gordon et al. 1994; Karst and Hasan 1991a,b; Massey et al. 1991; Soechting a…”
BackgroundResultPrevosto, V., Graf, W. M., & Ugolini, G. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp091 · Cited by 175
“This conjunction of inputs is consistent with the role of PML/Crus IIp PC strips in visual and proprioceptive guidance of reaching, and possibly coordination of arm/eye/head movement (Stein and Glickstein 1992; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Miall et al. 2001).”
MethodResultVisual guidance of the human foot during a step
Reynolds, R., & Day, B. (2005) · Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2005.095869 · Cited by 168
“This raises the possibility that non-visual cues, such as efferent information (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000) or proprioception, may have been used to correct movements.”
BackgroundCoordinating with the Future: The Anticipatory Nature of Representation
Pezzulo, G. (2008) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-008-9095-5 · Cited by 150
“Another function related to the control of action is erasing stimuli produced e.g. by the body of the agent (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundLin, K.-C., Wu, C.-Y., Wei, T.-H., Gung, C., Lee, C., & Liu, J.-S. (2007) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215507079843 · Cited by 158
Boendermaker, S. H., Funk, M., Summers, P. E., Brugger, P., Hepp‐Reymond, M., Curt, A. E. P., & Kollias, S. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.065 · Cited by 146
“The process of matching the final position of one’s limbs with an intended movement is achieved through a comparison process between the predicted sensory consequences of the action and the actual sensory feedback (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Wolpert and Ghahramani, 2000).”
BackgroundNarrators and comparators: the architecture of agentive self-awareness
Bayne, T., & Pacherie, É. (2007) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9239-9 · Cited by 111
“…the debate between the narrative-based and comparator-based approaches with the following tentative assumption: narrative-based approaches are likely to prove most viable with respect to agentive judgments, whereas comparator-based approaches are likely to prove most viable with respect to…”
BackgroundEffects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping
Schettino, L. F., Adamovich, S., & Poizner, H. (2003) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1435-3 · Cited by 149
“The specific timing of these differences could offer some information regarding the temporal pattern of the use of visual feedback during a reach-to-grasp movement, a point still open to debate (Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundPezzulo, G., & Levin, M. G. (2015) · Integrative Biology · doi:10.1039/c5ib00221d · Cited by 170
Neuronal Activity in the Supplementary Motor Area of Monkeys Adapting to a New Dynamic Environment
Padoa‐Schioppa, C., Li, C. R., & Bizzi, E. (2004) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00876.2002 · Cited by 128
Mosconi, M. W., Mohanty, S., Greene, R. K., Cook, E. H., Vaillancourt, D. E., & Sweeney, J. A. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2731-14.2015 · Cited by 156
“These action representations are believed to be generated in anterior cerebellar lobules I–V (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Molinari et al., 2002; Daskalakis et al., 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialGritsenko, V., Yakovenko, S., & Kalaska, J. (2009) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.91324.2008 · Cited by 145
Visual illusions affect planning but not control.
Glover, S. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01920-4 · Cited by 143
An internal model of a moving visual target in the lateral cerebellum
Cerminara, N., Apps, R., & Marple-Horvat, D. (2009) · Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2008.163337 · Cited by 142
“Predictive behaviour can be achieved through internal models (Miall et al. 1987; Wolpert et al. 1995; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Wolpert & Flanagan, 2001; Glasauer, 2003).”
BackgroundDenève, S., Duhamel, J., & Pouget, A. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3985-06.2007 · Cited by 142
“…internal models are used by the nervous system for estimating sensory variables and for optimal motor control (Wolpert et al., 1995a; Kawato, 1999; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Mehta and Schaal, 2002; Todorov, 2004; Saunders and Knill, 2005), but very little is known about the neural…”
MethodThinking as the control of imagination: a conceptual framework for goal-directed systems
Pezzulo, G., & Castelfranchi, C. (2009) · Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung · doi:10.1007/s00426-009-0237-z · Cited by 141
“…and (multiple) schema(s), composed of inverse and forward models, inside the dotted square. this loops parallels the external feedback loop and supports states and inputs estimation and fast corrective command (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000) via feedback prediction (the part in gray inside the loop).”
BackgroundImproved Visual Cognition through Stroboscopic Training
Appelbaum, L. G., Schroeder, J. E., Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00276 · Cited by 158
“One key aspect is the role of visual feedback – it is often critical to be able to assess and update the relative movements, distances, and masses of objects in the visual environment in order to anticipate the appropriate forces required for a successful motor plan (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundLarge-Field Visual Motion Directly Induces an Involuntary Rapid Manual Following Response
Saijo, N., Murakami, I., Nishida, S., & Gomi, H. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4143-04.2005 · Cited by 133
“Target representation cannot explain an MFR during nonreaching movement Nevertheless, it could be argued that a separate representation of target location within the sensorimotor system (Goodale et al., 1986; Prablanc and Martin, 1992; Pisella et al., 1998, 2000; Day and Lyon, 2000; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Brouwe…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBeyond the “Bereitschaftspotential”: Action preparation behind cognitive functions
Russo, F. D., Berchicci, M., Bozzacchi, C., Perri, R. L., Pitzalis, S., & Spinelli, D. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.019 · Cited by 156
“…might not result from a ‘direct-matching’ between observing and acting, but may result from the representation of the final goal of the action, which gives rise to a prediction of the sequence of movements and sensory consequences involved in its achievement (e.g. Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundMilot, M.-H., Marchal-Crespo, L., Green, C. S., Cramer, S. C., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2010) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2014-z · Cited by 139
“Correction of movement and thus improvement of performance likely occurred primarily by means of feed-forward control (Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundThe role of proprioception in action recognition
Farrer, C., Franck, N., Paillard, J., & Jeannerod, M. (2003) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/s1053-8100(03)00047-3 · Cited by 138
“One of these models, the internal forward model, estimates the sensory consequences (i.e. predicted sensory consequences) of the ensuing movements based on the copy of this motor command (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Wolpert & Ghahramani, 2000 for reviews).”
BackgroundRemapping auditory-motor representations in voice production.
Jones, J. A., & Munhall, K. (2005) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.063 · Cited by 137
“Several lines of research suggest that movements, including speech, are planned and then “supervised” by systems that monitor and compare internally and externally generated feedback [5, 6].”
Grounding Procedural and Declarative Knowledge in Sensorimotor Anticipation
Pezzulo, G. (2011) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01411.x · Cited by 151
“…(Doya, 1999; Kawato, 1999; Miall and Wolpert, 1996; Wolpert et al., 1995), visuomotor control (Mehta and Schaal, 2002), imagery (Jeannerod, 2001; Kosslyn, 1994), stabilization of perception (Haarmeier et al., 2001), and the realization of fast reaching movements (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundViolating body movement semantics: Neural signatures of self-generated and external-generated errors
Padrão, G., González-Franco, M., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., Slater, M., & Rodríguez‐Fornells, A. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.022 · Cited by 139
“Indeed, it has been proposed that this region might contain an internal model used for conscious monitoring of voluntary actions (Sirigu et al., 1996, 2004; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Farrer et al., 2008).”
Inertial properties of the arm are accurately predicted during motor imagery
Gentili, R. J., Cahouët, V., Ballay, Y., & Papaxanthis, C. (2004) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2004.04.027 · Cited by 138
Marchand, W. R. (2010) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0280-y · Cited by 137
“Feedback and feedforward mechanisms may be best understood in terms of human motor control, which is thought to involve both processes (Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundCoslett, H. B., Saffran, E. M., & Schwoebel, J. (2002) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.59.3.357 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grafton, Scott
- ORCID
- Grafton, Scott
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 423-431
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084145388
- Cited by
- 1,300
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 51
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Keywords
- forward model, sensorimotor delay, feedback control, reaching movements, motor planning, parietal lobe, cerebellum, motor control, mental time travel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review