The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements
Open accessAbstract
Delays in sensorimotor loops have led to the proposal that reaching movements are primarily under pre-programmed control and that sensory feedback loops exert an influence only at the very end of a trajectory. The present review challenges this view. Although behavioral data suggest that a motor plan is assembled prior to the onset of movement, more recent studies have indicated that this initial plan does not unfold unaltered, but is updated continuously by internal feedback loops. These loops rely on a forward model that integrates the sensory inflow and motor outflow to evaluate the consequence of the motor commands sent to a limb, such as the arm. In such a model, the probable position and velocity of an effector can be estimated with negligible delays and even predicted in advance, thus making feedback strategies possible for fast reaching movements. The parietal lobe and cerebellum appear to play a crucial role in this process. The ability of the motor system to estimate the future state of the limb might be an evolutionary substrate for mental operations that require an estimate of sequelae in the immediate future.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Mismatch detection and the forward model are involved in different aspects of motor execution: in motor control (for rapid online movement adaptation, for sensory attenuation), in motor learning (sensorimotor adaptation), but also for the sense of agency (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Blakemore and Sirigu, 2003; Jeannerod, 2009; Haggard, 2017; Dogge et al.,”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“Among these areas, the cerebellum is of particular interest and could be a comparator considering its unique architecture and connectivity (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Blakemore and Sirigu, 2003; Ito, 2006, 2008; Jeannerod, 2009; Tanaka et al., 2020; Figure 1).”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“The forward model integrates both the efference copy of the motor command and the sensory feedback to produce a prediction of the sensory consequences of the motor command.”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“On-line motor correction using the forward model would be faster than the processing time of using the sensory feedback alone.”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“It has thus been proposed that on-line motor control relies on a forward model.”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
In the citing paper
“These predictions are directly compared with the sensory feedback generated by the movement and thus provide an optimal estimate of the state of the effector; any discrepancy would be used to correct the on-going movement (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Tanaka et al., 2020).”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Desmurget and Grafton, 2000
Citations
Cites
An internal model for sensorimotor integration
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7569931 · Cited by 3,553
Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.
Kawato, M. (1999) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8 · Cited by 2,685
Das Reafferenzprinzip: Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie
von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950) · Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf00622503 · Cited by 2,655
Internal models in the cerebellum
Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01221-2 · Cited by 2,469
Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control
Miall, R. C., & Wolpert, D. M. (1996) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(96)00035-4 · Cited by 2,260
The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements
Duhamel, J.-R., Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1553535 · Cited by 1,966
THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT
Woodworth, R. S. (1899) · The Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0092992 · Cited by 1,747
Andersen, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C., & Xing, J. (1997) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.303 · Cited by 1,486
Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements.
Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C. E., & Keith Smith, J. E. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.3.340 · Cited by 1,406
Movement control in skilled motor performance.
Keele, S. W. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026739 · Cited by 1,176
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Keele, S.W. (1981) Behavioral analysis of movement. In Handbook of Physiology, Section 1: The Nervous System (Motor Control) (Vol. 2) (Brooks, W.B., ed.), pp. 1391–1414, Williams and Wilkins · DOI
- Arbib, M.A. (1981) Perceptual structures and distributed motor control. In Handbook of Physiology, Section 1: The Nervous System (Motor Control) (Vol. 2) (Brooks, W.B., ed.), pp. 1449–1480, Williams and Wilkins · DOI
- Jeannerod, M. (1988) The Neural and Behavioral Organization of Goal-Directed Movements, Clarendon Press
- Milner, 1992, A model for the generation of movements requiring endpoint precision, Neurosci., 49, 487, 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90113-G · DOI
- Pélisson, 1986, Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. II. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double step stimulus, Exp. Brain Res., 62, 303
- Gerdes, 1994, The use of internal representation in fast gold-directed movements: a modeling approach, Biol. Cybern., 70, 513, 10.1007/BF00198804 · DOI
- Paillard, J. (1982) The contribution of peripheral and central vision to visually guided reaching. In Analysis of Visual Behavior (Ingle,D.J. et al., eds), pp. 367–382, MIT Press
- Pelisson, 1995, Online compensation of gaze shifts perturbed by micro-stimulation of the superior colliculus in the cat with unrestrained head, Exp. Brain Res., 106, 196, 10.1007/BF00241115 · DOI
- Robinson, D. (1975) Oculomotor control signals. In Basic Mechanisms of Ocular Motility and their Clinical Implications (Lennerstrand, G. and Bach-y-Rita, P., eds), pp. 337–344, Pergamon Press
- Van Sonderen, 1989, Motor programs for goal-directed movements are continuously adjusted according to changes in target location, Exp. Brain Res., 78, 139, 10.1007/BF00230693 · DOI
- Gordon, 1994, Accuracy of planar reaching movements. 1. Independence of direction and extent variability, Exp. Brain Res., 99, 97, 10.1007/BF00241415 · DOI
- Vindras, 1998, Pointing errors reflect biases in the perception of the initial hand position, J. Neurophysiol., 79, 3290, 10.1152/jn.1998.79.6.3290 · DOI
- Prablanc, 1979, Optimal response of eye and hand motor system in pointing at visual target. I. Spatio-temporal characteristics of eye and hand movements and their relationships when varying the amount of visual information, Biol. Cybern., 35, 113, 10.1007/BF00337436 · DOI
- Desmurget, 1999, Functional anatomy of error correction during reaching movements in the dark, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 25, 787
- Inoue, 1998, PET study of pointing with visual feedback of moving hands, J. Neurophysiol., 79, 117, 10.1152/jn.1998.79.1.117 · DOI
- Kawato, 1987, A hierarchical neural-network model for control and learning of voluntary movement, Biol. Cybern., 57, 169, 10.1007/BF00364149 · DOI
- Johansson, 1984, Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when rougher or more slippery, Exp. Brain Res., 56, 550, 10.1007/BF00237997 · DOI
- Muller, 1994, Dyscoordination of pinch and lift forces during grasp in patients with cerebellar lesions, Exp. Brain Res., 101, 485, 10.1007/BF00227341 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,000
Archambault, P. S., Ferrari-Toniolo, S., Caminiti, R., & Battaglia-Mayer, A. (2015) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2014.09.009 · Cited by 75
Representations of the human body in the production and imitation of complex movements
Schwoebel, J., Buxbaum, L. J., & Coslett, H. B. (2004) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643290342000348 · Cited by 75
The case for the comparator model as an explanation of the sense of agency and its breakdowns
Carruthers, G. (2010) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.08.005 · Cited by 96
“1 (Frith et al., 2000a, p. 1773; Kawato, 1999, see Desmurget and Grafton (2000), Wolpert and Ghahramani (2000) for reviews).”
Martin, K., Jacobs, S., & Frey, S. H. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.036 · Cited by 66
“Earlier work suggests involvement of posterior parietal cortex in state estimation (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Wolpert et al., 1995), and transcranial magnetic stimulation of aIPS (Tunik et al., 2005) or cIPS (Desmurget et al., 1999) interferes with the ability to update motor plans based on…”
Effects of Anisometropic Amblyopia on Visuomotor Behavior, Part 2: Visually Guided Reaching
Niechwiej‐Szwedo, E., Goltz, H. C., Chandrakumar, M., Hirji, Z. A., Crawford, J. D., & WONG, A. M. F. (2010) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6092 · Cited by 73
“During the movement execution stage, visual and proprioceptive feedback arising from the receptors is monitored, updated, and compared with the corollary discharge(4,5) so that the motor system can detect errors and correct them quickly to achieve optimal performance.(6) In most everyday situations, input from all sen…”
Cortical Modulations Increase in Early Sessions with Brain-Machine Interface
Zacksenhouse, M., Lebedev, M., Carmena, J. M., O’Doherty, J. E., Henriquez, C. S., & Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000619 · Cited by 64
“The motor system may correct the execution-errors on-line using feedback control [37,38] or initiate explorative activity to learn the new environment.”
BackgroundBasal ganglia network mediates the control of movement amplitude
Desmurget, M., Grafton, S. T., Vindras, P., Gréa, H., & Turner, R. (2003) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1593-3 · Cited by 74
Self-citationIs perceptual anticipation a motor simulation? A PET study
Chaminade, T., Méary, D., Orliaguet, J.-P., & Decety, J. (2001) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200112040-00013 · Cited by 80
Tunik, E., Ortigue, S., Adamovich, S., & Grafton, S. T. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3303-08.2008 · Cited by 73
“Sensorimotor integration can be reliably assayed by measuring compensatory motor responses in the face of unpredictable perturbations, forcing subjects to update an ongoing action (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundSelf-citationGait-dependent motor memory facilitation in covert movement execution
Courtine, G., Papaxanthis, C., Gentili, R. J., & Pozzo, T. (2004) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.07.008 · Cited by 76
Hyde, C., & Wilson, P. (2013) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565641.2012.718820 · Cited by 72
“This is thought to be achieved by way of a forward (predictive) model of the spatiotemporal and kinetic parameters of the impending movement, which is compared with incoming afferent signals (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Shadmehr & Krakeaur, 2008).”
BackgroundNaish, K. R., Reader, A. T., Houston‐Price, C., Bremner, A. J., & Holmes, N. P. (2012) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3367-2 · Cited by 104
Steels, L., & Hild, M. (2012) · Springer US · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3064-3 · Cited by 72
Behavioural Significance of Cerebellar Modules
Cerminara, N., & Apps, R. (2010) · Cerebellum · doi:10.1007/s12311-010-0209-2 · Cited by 71
“feedback [109, 128–131].”
A hand and a field effect in on-line motor control in unilateral optic ataxia.
Blangero, A., Gaveau, V., Luauté, J., Rode, G., Salemme, R., Guinard, M., Boisson, D., Rossetti, Y., & Pisella, L. (2008) · Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.09.004 · Cited by 71
“…on-line motor corrections in OA would then suggest a specific disruption of the visuo-proprioceptive comparison of target and hand locations (Vindras, 1998) or an impaired forward modelling of the hand trajectory used for on-line comparison to visual target location (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundDanion, F., & Sarlegna, F. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3110-07.2007 · Cited by 71
“There is growing evidence that skilled motor behavior relies on the ability of the brain to predict the outcome of volitional acts (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Flanagan et al., 2006).”
BackgroundEffects of time pressure on verbal self-monitoring: An ERP study
Ganushchak, L. Y., & Schiller, N. O. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.096 · Cited by 59
Directive Minds: How Dynamics Shapes Cognition
Engel, A. K. (2010) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262014601.003.0009 · Cited by 70
“Another important line of evidence concerns research on the function and neural mechanisms of “corollary discharge” or “reafference” signals, which are necessary for an organism to distinguish self-generated sensory changes from those not related to own action (Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Crapse and Sommer 2008).”
BackgroundA cerebellar internal model calibrates a feedback controller involved in sensorimotor control
Markov, D. A., Petrucco, L., Kist, A. M., & Portugues, R. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26988-0 · Cited by 68
“This happens online, so feedback controllers are limited by the time delay required for sensory processing, which in the case of visual feedback is estimated to be between 100 to 300 ms (Barnett-Cowan and Harris, 2009; Brenner and Smeets, 2003; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Saunders and Knill, 2003, 2005).”
BackgroundMethodImpairment of online control of hand and eye movements in a monkey model of optic ataxia.
Battaglia-Mayer, A., Ferrari-Toniolo, S., Visco-Comandini, F., Archambault, P., Saberi-Moghadam, S., & Caminiti, R. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs250 · Cited by 70
“Online corrections might reside on motor outflow (Desmurget and Grafton 2000) and/or on sensory information, such as retinal error (Blouin et al. 1995; Desmurget et al. 1999).”
BackgroundEyes-Free Target Acquisition in Interaction Space around the Body for Virtual Reality
Yan, Y.-K., Yu, C., Ma, X.-J., Huang, S., Iqbal, H., & Shi, Y.-C. (2018) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173616 · Cited by 69
“Most of these works studied the acquisition accuracy, which is presumably determined by the resolution of proprioception [37] and the acquisition speed, which is influenced by the reaction time of the proprioception [11].”
BackgroundAge-related loss of adaptability to fast time scales in motor variability.
Sosnoff, J., & Newell, K. (2008) · The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/63.6.p344 · Cited by 69
Behavioral and cortical mechanisms for spatial coding and action planning.
Medendorp, W., Beurze, S., van Pelt, S. V., & van der Werf, J. (2008) · Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.06.001 · Cited by 69
“…online guidance of the movement (Desmurget et al., 1999; Lee and Van Donkelaar, 2006; Wolpert et al., 1998; Karnath and Perenin, 2005; Grea et al., 2002), using a forward model to estimate the current state of the limb in gaze-centered coordinates (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Ariff et al., 2002).”
Emotion in action: A predictive processing perspective and theoretical synthesis
Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2017) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073916661765 · Cited by 68
“Forward models deliver predictions that help interpret the sensory effects of one’s actions, or those of others (Blakemore, Wolpert, & Frith, 2002; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; O’Regan & Noë, 2001; Wolpert & Flanagan, 2001).”
BackgroundContinuously updating one’s predictions underlies successful interception
Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2018) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00517.2018 · Cited by 76
“We do not even know to what extent the brain really considers such issues (building forward models; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Flanagan and Wing 1997; Ishikawa et al. 2016; Mehta and Schaal 2002; Wolpert and Flanagan 2001; Miall and Wolpert 1996; Wolpert et al. 1998) and to what extent near-optimal movements arise fr…”
BackgroundThe development of rapid online control in children aged 6-12 years: reaching performance.
Wilson, P., & Hyde, C. (2013) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2013.02.008 · Cited by 68
Fast and accurate edge orientation processing during object manipulation
Pruszynski, J., Flanagan, J., & Johansson, R. (2017) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/163790 · Cited by 67
“Here we directly contrast two synthetic populations where: (1) each unit has a uniform receptive field by virtue of being connected to one receptive element the same size as its receptive field and (2) each unit has subfields by virtue of being connected to a random number (2-64) of receptor elements (each 250 m in di…”
Limanowski, J., Kirilina, E. P., & Blankenburg, F. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.009 · Cited by 78
“, 2005) and possibly also by dynamical error signals computed by the PPC (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
InfluentialMental practice promotes motor anticipation: evidence from skilled music performance
Bernardi, N. F., Buglio, M. D., Trimarchi, P., Chielli, A., & Bricolo, E. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00451 · Cited by 67
Oshio, R., Tanaka, S., Sadato, N., Sokabe, M., Hanakawa, T., & Honda, M. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.034 · Cited by 67
“As is well-known for the motor control domain, the feedback monitoring system functions to precisely correct movements when they are inaccurate by comparing the target position and the predicted movement end-position according to a copy of the movement command (efferent copy) and sensory inflow (Desmurget and Grafton,…”
MethodVisuomotor Behaviour in Amblyopia: Deficits and Compensatory Adaptations
Niechwiej‐Szwedo, E., Colpa, L., & WONG, A. M. F. (2019) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2019/6817839 · Cited by 74
Differentiating between two models of motor lateralization.
Shabbott, B. A., & Sainburg, R. (2008) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.90349.2008 · Cited by 65
Neural evidence for predictive coding in auditory cortex during speech production
Okada, K., Matchin, W., & Hickok, G. S. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1284-x · Cited by 73
“…versus altered (unpredicted) speech, but the observed localization of this effect did not fall squarely in auditory cortex but rather in what appears to be an auditory-motor integration area, area Spt (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Kawato, 1999; Wolpert, 1997;Wolpert, Ghahramani, & Jordan, 1995).”
BackgroundReichenbach, A., Bresciani, J., Peer, A., Bülthoff, H., & Thielscher, A. (2010) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq225 · Cited by 64
“This skill necessitates the fast processing of sensory information about our body and the environment in order to continuously control our movement (Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
Ganushchak, L. Y., & Schiller, N. O. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20514 · Cited by 55
“If there is a mismatch between them, an error signal is generated and corrective processes can be started— similar to action monitoring (see Rodrı́gues-Fornells et al., 2002; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
MethodInfluentialMotor Cortex Dynamics in Visuomotor Production of Speech and Non-speech Mouth Movements
Saarinen, T., Laaksonen, H., Parviainen, T. M., & Salmelin, R. H. (2005) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi099 · Cited by 53
“the balance between pre-planning and using sensory feedback to correct movement pattern (e.g. Desmurget and Grafton, 2000 ).”
BackgroundCompensatory responses to brief perturbations of speech amplitude
Heinks-Maldonado, T., & Houde, J. (2005) · Acoustics Research Letters Online · doi:10.1121/1.1931747 · Cited by 64
Neurocognitive mechanisms of perception–action coordination: A review and theoretical integration
Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.008 · Cited by 61
Seeing the hand while reaching speeds up on‐line responses to a sudden change in target position
Reichenbach, A., Thielscher, A., Peer, A., Bülthoff, H., & Bresciani, J. (2009) · Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2009.176362 · Cited by 63
“Email: bresciani@tuebingen.mpg.de When reaching for a target object, the afferent signals provided by different sensory channels are continuously processed to supervise the ongoing movement (Wolpert et al. 1995; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundKinesthetic Working Memory and Action Control within the Dorsal Stream
Fiehler, K., Burke, M., Engel, A., Bień, S., & Rösler, F. (2007) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm071 · Cited by 59
“In particular, the aIPS has been discussed as a flexible dynamic area capable of goal-dependent updating of actions in order to establish an internal action representation (cf., Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
MethodAndersen, R. A., Burdick, J. W., Musallam, S., Pesaran, B., & Cham, J. G. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.09.009 · Cited by 134
Another major function of the anterior cingulate cortex: The representation of requirements
Weston, C. S. E. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.04.014 · Cited by 66
Sattin, D., Parma, C., Lunetta, C., Zulueta, A., Lanzone, J., Giani, L., Vassallo, M., Picozzi, M., & Parati, E. A. (2023) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci13101410 · Cited by 58
“…different theories have been proposed, distinguishing, for example, efference information that in turn predicts the location of a body part in action, the “forward model” [45,46], from the source of information regarding the body part position that is provided by feedback from sensory systems [47].”
BackgroundLappi, O., & Mole, C. D. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000150 · Cited by 73
Movement Adjustments Have Short Latencies Because There is No Need to Detect Anything
Smeets, J. B. J., Wijdenes, L. O., & Brenner, E. (2015) · Motor Control · doi:10.1123/mc.2014-0064 · Cited by 65
The neuromechanical adaptations to Achilles tendinosis
Chang, Y.-J., & Kulig, K. (2015) · Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp270220 · Cited by 62
“Feedforward, however, utilizes the information learned from past experience to control the body parts to reach a desired position, which allows the body to reach the desired position faster (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundUniversally manipulable body models—dual quaternion representations in layered and dynamic MMCs
Schilling, M. (2011) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-011-9226-3 · Cited by 51
“A possible solution is to rely on a fast prediction of the expected feedback that could be provided by a forward model (Miall et al., 1993; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundSpecificity of practice results from differences in movement planning strategies
Mackrous, I., & Proteau, L. (2007) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-007-1031-z · Cited by 57
“This model receives a copy of the motor commands that is used to predict movement endpoint and to compare it with the target location, allowing for a quick updating of the motor command (for reviews see Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Khan et al. 2006).”
Optic ataxia as a deficit specific to the on-line control of actions
Glover, S. (2003) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(03)00072-1 · Cited by 51
The evolution of cognition - a hypothesis
Cruse, H. (2003) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(02)00110-6 · Cited by 62
“…been postulated by Smith and Shadmehr (2000) who address the basal ganglia as to play an important role in this context, however, also posterior parietal cortex, cerebellum and motor cortices are discussed to contribute to an internal body model (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Decety & Grèzes, 1999).”
BackgroundSmits-Engelsman, B., & Wilson, P. (2013) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2012.06.006 · Cited by 61
“For this control system to work, an estimation of the state of the body in space is needed: this state estimator appears to involve parietocerebellar loops (Desmurget et al., 1999; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundYour mind's hand: Motor imagery of pointing movements with different accuracy
Lorey, B., Pilgramm, S., Walter, B., Stark, R. M., Munzert, J., & Zentgraf, K. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.038 · Cited by 62
“The present study investigated whether brain areas coding for specific motor parameters within motor control (Blakemore and Sirigu, 2003; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000) are also involved inmotor imagery.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPapadopoulos, N., McGinley, J., Tonge, B., Bradshaw, J., Saunders, K., & Rinehart, N. (2012) · Research in Autism · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2011.05.010 · Cited by 61
Optimal Sensorimotor Control in Eye Movement Sequences
Munuera, J., Morel, P., Duhamel, J., & Denève, S. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1169-08.2009 · Cited by 58
“, unfolding as a preprogrammed sequence of muscle contraction (Goodale et al., 1986; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundFuelscher, I., Caeyenberghs, K., Enticott, P., Williams, J., Lum, J., & Hyde, C. (2018) · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.01.002 · Cited by 59
“In doing so, internal models provide stability to the motor system in an uncertain environment (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Izawa and Shadmehr, 2011; Wolpert et al., 2011).”
Transient visual pathway critical for normal development of primate grasping behavior
Mundiñano, I.-C., Fox, D. M., Kwan, W. C., Vidaurre, D., Teo, L., Homman‐Ludiye, J., Goodale, M. A., Leopold, D. A., & Bourne, J. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1717016115 · Cited by 62
“This model divides reaching into two components, an initial feedforward phase related to planning processes and a second feedback phase related to processes that mediate hand path corrections (15).”
BackgroundTemporal Evolution of Spatial Computations for Visuomotor Control
Franklin, D. W., Reichenbach, A., Franklin, S., & Diedrichsen, J. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0052-15.2016 · Cited by 59
“This suggests that the spatial computations underlying feedforward and feedback control might rely on sim- ilar processes and neuronal substrates (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Scott, 2004; Pruszynski et al., 2011).”
BackgroundBattaglia‐Mayer, A., Buiatti, T., Caminiti, R., Ferraina, S., Lacquaniti, F., & Shallice, T. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.03.002 · Cited by 56
“Both forward and inverse models can be used in internal error-correcting loops (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Kawato, 1999).”
MethodComputational motor control: feedback and accuracy
Guigon, E., Baraduc, P., & Desmurget, M. (2008) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06028.x · Cited by 69
“The weakness of these models is the absence of online feedback control, which is necessary for the continuous updating of motor commands by internal and external feedback loops (Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Todorov & Jordan, 2002; Saunders & Knill, 2004; Guigon et al ., 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPredictive information and error processing: The role of medial‐frontal cortex during motor control
Krigolson, O. E., & Holroyd, C. B. (2007) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00523.x · Cited by 53
“Several lines of research suggest that the sensorimotor transformations necessary for this type of online motor control depend on posterior parietal cortex (PPC; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Desmurget et al., 1999, 2001; Grea et al., 2002) and the cerebellum (Blakemore, Frith, & Wolpert, 2001; Miall, Reckess, & Imamizu,…”
BackgroundInfluentialSarlegna, F. R., Baud‐Bovy, G., & Danion, F. (2010) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00174.2010 · Cited by 50
The Where and When of Intention
Eagleman, D. M. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095331 · Cited by 57
Reichenbach, A., Thielscher, A., Peer, A., Bülthoff, H., & Bresciani, J. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.024 · Cited by 60
“As different mechanisms have been suggested for planning vs. execution of a goal-directed movement (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Glover, 2002; Sabes, 2000), their neural implementation may also rely on distinct cortical regions.”
InfluentialProteau, L., & Isabelle, G. (2002) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222890209601954 · Cited by 57
How people initiate energy optimization and converge on their optimal gaits
Selinger, J. C., Wong, J. D., Simha, S. N., & Donelan, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.198234 · Cited by 61
Chen, H.-C., Chen, C.-L., Kang, L.-J., Wu, C.-Y., Chen, F.-C., & Hong, W. (2014) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.025 · Cited by 57
Seeing the last part of a hitting movement is enough to adapt to a temporal delay.
de la Malla, C., López-Moliner, J., & Brenner, E. (2012) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/12.10.4 · Cited by 57
How active gaze informs the hand in sequential pointing movements
Wilmut, K., Wann, J. P., & Brown, J. H. (2006) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0580-x · Cited by 55
“…previous studies that have suggested that on presentation of a target the initial hand movement is planned on the basis of retinal coordinates and following foveation the hand movement is updated using ocular-proprioception (Desmurget and Grafton 2000; Fisk and Goodale 1985; Prablanc et al. 1979).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAction control in visual neglect
Coulthard, E. J., Parton, A. D., & Husain, M. (2005) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.004 · Cited by 55
Anticipatory control of actions
Hoffmann, J., Stoecker, C., & Kunde, W. (2004) · International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1612197x.2004.9671750 · Cited by 44
Arrighi, P., Bonfiglio, L., Minichilli, F., Cantore, N., Carboncini, M., Piccotti, E., Rossi, B., & Andre, P. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150265 · Cited by 55
“that this error signal is generated mainly by the discrepancy between the predicted visual consequences of movement command elaborated by a forward model and the actual visual sensory estimates (see [2] for review).”
InfluentialThe delayed and noisy nervous system: implications for neural control
MILTON, J. G. (2011) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/8/6/065005 · Cited by 56
“the effects of delays [5, 6], such as delay compensatory mechanisms based on forward models [8] and predictive mechanisms based on the concept of an internal inverse model [9], or combinations thereof [10–12].”
When Ears Drive Hands: The Influence of Contact Sound on Reaching to Grasp
Castiello, U., Giordano, B. L., Begliomini, C., Ansuini, C., & Grassi, M. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012240 · Cited by 54
“control, may be temporally overlapping [40–42].”
Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans
Mirabella, G., Pani, P., Paré, M., & Ferraina, S. (2006) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0456-0 · Cited by 100
“These peripheral inhibitory processes may thus participate, downstream of the motor plan, in the online adaptive control of movements that is becoming well documented (e.g., Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundBeliefs and desires in the predictive brain
Yon, D., Heyes, C. M., & Press, C. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18332-9 · Cited by 50
Selective Modulation of Early Visual Cortical Activity by Movement Intention
Gallivan, J. P., Chapman, C. S., Gale, D. J., Flanagan, J. R., & Culham, J. C. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy345 · Cited by 57
Feed-forward motor control of ultrafast, ballistic movements
Kagaya, K., & Patek, S. N. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.130518 · Cited by 54
“For example, the relatively slow reaching movements performed by monkeys that last 100s of milliseconds are likely to be dependent on internal models acquired in advance rather than online sensory feedback control (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundPrada, M., Remazeilles, A., Koene, A., & Endo, S. (2013) · 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros.2013.6696498 · Cited by 54
“In order to fit with human behavior [4], we proposed to change the weights of the two components of the DMP system, to obtain a predominantly feedforward control policy at an earlier phase of the motion (not disturbed by the goal-attractor) and a predominantly visual feedback control towards the end of the motion, as…”
MethodNeely, K. A., Coombes, S. A., Planetta, P. J., & Vaillancourt, D. E. (2011) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21467 · Cited by 59
“Indeed, previous neuroimaging, neurophysiology, and neurobehavioral investigations demonstrate that IPL, PMv, and the prefrontal cortex are involved in the online control of action [Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Filimon, 2010; Grafton, 2010].”
BackgroundThaler, L., & Goodale, M. A. (2011) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00092 · Cited by 47
“In recent years advancements have been made in understanding the neural and computational basis of pointing and reaching movements that are directed at visual targets (for reviews see for example Desmurget et al., 1998; Lacquaniti and Caminiti, 1998; Kawato, 1999; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Todorov, 2004; Buneo and…”
BackgroundHuman basal ganglia and the dynamic control of force during on-line corrections
Grafton, S. T., & Tunik, E. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3301-10.2011 · Cited by 54
“On-line corrections can be observed early in a movement, suggesting they rely on an internal model of expected plant dynamics (Kawato, 1999; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
Self-citationGosselin-Kessiby, N., Kalaska, J. F., & Messier, J. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2374-08.2009 · Cited by 49
The Role of Awareness in Processing of Oculomotor Capture: Evidence from Event-related Potentials
Belopolsky, A. V., Kramer, A. F., & Theeuwes, J. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20161 · Cited by 49
Kobler, R. J., Sburlea, A. I., & Müller-Putz, G. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-36326-y · Cited by 54
Action history influences subsequent movement via two distinct processes
Marinovic, W., Poh, E., de Rugy, A., & Carroll, T. J. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.26713 · Cited by 44
“This timing is similar to that used by Verstynen and Sabes (2011) and reflects the feedforward phase of the movement (Elliott et al., 2001), before feedback mechanisms can affect cursor trajectory (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundMethodObservation-based learning for brain–machine interfaces
Tkach, D. C., Reimer, J., & Hatsopoulos, N. G. (2008) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.09.016 · Cited by 54
“Inverse models (which map kinematic trajectories to motor commands) have been hypothesized to play a role in the planning and execution of movement, while forward models (from motor commands to kinematic trajectories) have been proposed to provide internal feedback signals that expedite movement error estimation [35,3…”
Saccadic Output Is Influenced by Limb Kinetics During Eye—Hand Coordination
van Donkelaar, P., Siu, K., & Walterschied, J. (2004) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.3200/jmbr.36.3.245-252 · Cited by 43
“Current theoretical models of limb movement control generally include such predictive efference copy signals (e.g., Desmurget & Grafton, 2000).”
BackgroundGribova, A., Donchin, O., Bergman, H., Vaadia, E., & de Oliveira, S. C. (2002) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1174-x · Cited by 53
Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans
Mirabella, G., Pani, P., Paré, M., & Ferraina, S. (2009) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1727-3 · Cited by 53
“These peripheral inhibitory processes may thus participate, downstream of the motor plan, in the online adaptive control of movements that is becoming well documented (e.g., Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundDeficits in the evolution of hand preshaping in Parkinson’s disease
Schettino, L. F., Rajaraman, V., Jack, D., Adamovich, S., Sage, J., & Howard Poizner, A. (2003) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00150-7 · Cited by 50
Predicting Future Sensorimotor States Influences Current Temporal Decision Making
Hermosillo, R. J. M., Ritterband‐Rosenbaum, A., & van Donkelaar, P. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0037-11.2011 · Cited by 29
“To explain such seamless responses, theories of limb motor control have emphasized the predictive or anticipatory nature of the planning process (Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Diedrichsen et al., 2010).”
BackgroundKinesthetic motor imagery modulates body sway
Rodrigues, É. C., Lemos, T., Gouvêa, B. D. S., Volchan, E., Imbiriba, L. A., & Vargas, C. D. (2010) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.04.081 · Cited by 85
Vesia, M., Yan, X., Henriques, D. Y. P., Sergio, L. E., & Crawford, J. D. (2008) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.90519.2008 · Cited by 57
Optimality, stochasticity, and variability in motor behavior
Guigon, E., Baraduc, P., & Desmurget, M. (2007) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10827-007-0041-y · Cited by 53
“Despite these striking successes, it appears difficult to hypothesize that motor control is purely an openloop process (Desmurget and Grafton 2000).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSkill theory v2.0: dispositions, emulation, and spatial perception
Grush, R. (2007) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9236-z · Cited by 52
“The emulation theory is built around the idea that the brains of organisms construct and maintain internal models, or emulators, of many of the processes with which it interacts, including its body and environment (Ito 1970; Desmurget and Grafton 2000; for more references see Grush 2004a,b).”
BackgroundThe alien hand syndrome: What makes the alien hand alien?
Biran, I., Giovannetti, T., Buxbaum, L., & Chatterjee, A. (2006) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643290500180282 · Cited by 52
“Finally, the patient needs to have a relatively intact action-monitoring system to be aware of the abnormal movements as they are occurring.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialVisuomotor transformations affect bimanual coupling
Weigelt, C., & de Oliveira, S. C. (2003) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1316-1 · Cited by 52
“Since movements in our task lasted about 300 ms (until movement reversal), and the minimal time for visual feedback to influence ongoing movements has been estimated at ~120 ms (Paillard 1996; Desmurget and Grafton 2000), a role for visual feedback cannot be excluded.”
BackgroundBach, P., Frank, C., & Kunde, W. (2022) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-022-01773-w · Cited by 56
“During overt action, such predictions may allow the actor to filter out predicted sensations (e.g., Reichenbach et al., 2014) or to correct for movement errors before they happen (e.g., Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Shadmehr et al., 2010).”
BackgroundNiechwiej‐Szwedo, E., Kennedy, S. A., Colpa, L., Chandrakumar, M., Goltz, H. C., & WONG, A. M. F. (2012) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.12-9855 · Cited by 53
Smits-Engelsman, B., Sugden, D., & Duysens, J. (2006) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2005.12.002 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grafton, Scott
- ORCID
- Grafton, Scott
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 423-431
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084145388
- Cited by
- 1,300
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 51
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Keywords
- forward model, sensorimotor delay, feedback control, reaching movements, motor planning, parietal lobe, cerebellum, motor control, mental time travel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review