Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 374

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science

DRUCKMAN, JAMES N., GREEN, DONALD P., KUKLINSKI, JAMES H., LUPIA, ARTHUR·2006·American Political Science Review

Abstract

Although political scientists have long expressed skepticism about the prospects for experimental science, an analysis of the first hundred volumes of the American Political Science Review reveals that randomized experiments have grown in impact and prominence. We document how thinking about experimentation has evolved over the century, and demonstrate the growing influence of laboratory, survey, and field experiments. A number of experiments have transformed how political scientists think about causal relationships in specific substantive areas. There are limits to the kinds of questions that experiments can address, but experiments have made important contributions in an array of political science subfields.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0003055406062514

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Green Donald P .1992.“The Price Elasticity of Mass Preferences.”American Political Science Review 86 (March):128–48. · DOI
  2. Nelson Thomas E. , Rosalee A. Clawson , and Zoe M. Oxley .1997.“Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance.”American Political Science Review 91 (September):567–83. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Gerber Alan S. , and Donald P. Green .2005.“Correction to Gerber and Green (2000), Replication of Disputed Findings, and Reply to Imai (2005).”American Political Science Review 99 (June):301–313. · DOI
  4. Sniderman Paul M. , Richard A. Brody , and Philip E. Tetlock .1991.Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bartels Larry M .1993.“Messages Received.”American Political Science Review 87 (June):267–85. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Tetlock Philip E. , and Richard Ned Lebow .2001.“Pocking Counterfactual Holes in Covering Laws.”American Political Science Review 95 (December):829–43. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Eldersveld Samuel J .1956.“Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting Behavior.”American Political Science Review 50 (March):154–65. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Campbell Donald T .1969.“Reforms as Experiments.”American Psychologist 24 (4):409–29. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Gerber Alan S. , and Donald P. Green .2000.“The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout.”American Political Science Review 94 (September):653–63. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Sniderman Paul M. , and Douglas B. Grob .1996.“Innovations in Experimental Design in Attitude Surveys.”Annual Review of Sociology 22:377–99. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Sniderman Paul M. , Look Hagendoorn , and Markus Prior .2004.“Predispositional Factors and Situational Triggers.”American Political Science Review 98 (February):35–50. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Cover Albert D. , and Bruce S. Brumberg .1982.“Baby Books and Ballots.”American Political Science Review 76 (June):347–59. · doi:10.2307/1961114
  13. Druckman James N .2004.“Political Preference Formation.”American Political Science Review 98 (November):671–86. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Mahoney Robert , and Daniel Druckman .1975.“Simulation, Experimentation, and Context.”Simulation & Games 6 (September):235–70. · DOI
  15. Ansolabehere Stephen , Shanto Iyengar , Adam Simon , and Nicholas Valentino .1994.“Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?”American Political Science Review 88 (December):829–38. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Inglehart Ronald .1990.Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society.Princeton NJ:Princeton University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Fiorina Morris P. , and Charles R. Plott .1978.“Committee Decisions under Majority Rule.”American Political Science Review 72 (June):575–98. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Druckman James N. , and Joanne M. Miller .2004.“The Political Psychology of Electoral Campaigns.”Political Psychology 25 (4):501–506. · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00383.x
  19. McDermott Rose .2002.“Experimental Methods in Political Science.”Annual Review of Political Science 5:31–61. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Fréchette Guillaume , John H. Kagel , and Steven F. Lehrer .2003.“Bargaining in Legislatures.”American Political Science Review 97 (June):221–32. · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000637
  21. Lau Richard R. , and David P. Redlawsk .1997.“Voting Correctly.”American Political Science Review 91 (September):585–98. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Iyengar Shanto , Mark D. Peters , and Donald R. Kinder .1982.“Experimental Demonstrations of the ‘Not-So-Minimal’ Consequences of Television News Programs.American Political Science Review 76 (December):848–58. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Quattrone George A. , and Amos Tversky .1988.“Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice.”American Political Science Review 82 (September):719–36. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Sniderman Paul M .1995.“Evaluation Standards for a Slow-Moving Science.”PS: Political Science and Politics 28 (September):464–67. · doi:10.2307/420307
  25. McGraw Kathleen M. , and Valerie Hoekstra .1994.“Experimentation in Political Science.”Research in Micropolitics 3:3–29.
  26. Lodge Milton , Kathleen M. McGraw , and Patrick Stroh .1989.“An Impression-driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.”American Political Science Review 83 (June):399–419. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Inglehart Ronald .1977.The Silent Revolution: Changing.Princeton NJ:Princeton University Press.
  28. Morton Rebecca B. , and Kenneth C. Williams .2006.“Experimentation in Political Science.”In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology,ed. Janet Box-Steffensmeier , David Collier , and Henry Brady .Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  29. Clarke Harold D. , Allan Kornberg , Chris McIntyre , Petra Bauer-Kaase , and Max Kaase .1999.“The Effect of Economic Priorities on the Measurement of Value Change.”American Political Science Review 93 (September):637–47. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Ostrom Elinor , James Walker , and Roy Gardner .1992.“Covenants with and Without a Sword.”American Political Science Review 86 (June):404–17. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Hermann Charles F. , and Margaret G. Hermann .1967.“An Attempt to Simulate the Outbreak of World War I.”American Political Science Review 61 (June):400–16. · DOI
  32. Nickerson David W. 2006.“Measuring Interpersonal Influence.”Doctoral thesis,Department of Political Science, Yale University.
  33. Roth Alvin E. 1995.“Introduction to Experimental Economics.”In The Handbook of Experimental Economics,ed. John H. Kagel and Alvin E. Roth .Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  34. Morton Rebecca B .1993.“Incomplete Information and Ideological Explanations of Platform Divergence.”American Political Science Review 87 (June):382–92. · DOI
  35. Druckman James N. , and Arthur Lupia .2006.“Mind, Will, and Choice.”In Charles Tilly and Robert E. Goodin , (eds.).The Oxford Handbook on Contextual Political Analysis.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  36. Lowell A. Lawrence .1910.“The Physiology of Politics.”American Political Science Review 4 (February):1–15. · doi:10.2307/1944407
  37. Gilens Martin .1996.“‘Race Coding’ and White Opposition to Welfare.”American Political Science Review 90 (September):593–604. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Lodge Milton , Marco R. Steenbergen , and Shawn Brau .1995.“The Responsive Voter.”American Political Science Review 89 (June):309–26. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Lasswell Harold D .1951.“The Immediate Future of Research Policy and Method in Political Science.”American Political Science Review 45 (March):133–42. · doi:10.2307/1950887

Cited by

See all 374

Metadata

Authors
DRUCKMAN, J. N., GREEN, D. P., KUKLINSKI, J. H., & LUPIA, A.
Venue
American Political Science Review
Published
2006-11
Volume
100
Issue
4
Pages
627-635
ISSN
  • 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5943
OpenAlex
W2156622618
Cited by
374
References
3
FWCI
51.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0003055406062514
The paper
DRUCKMAN, J. N., GREEN, D. P., KUKLINSKI, J. H., & LUPIA, A. (2006). The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055406062514

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.