The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gum arabic establishes prebiotic functionality in healthy human volunteers in a dose-dependent manner
Open accessAbstract
The present study was undertaken to determine the prebiotic efficacy of gum arabic upon consumption by man for up to 4 weeks and, if any, to establish the dose–effect relationship. Human healthy volunteers consumed various daily doses (5, 10, 20, 40 g) of gum arabic (EmulGold®) in water for up to 4 weeks. Daily consumption of water was taken as the negative control and that of 10 g inulin as the positive control. At 0, 1, 2 and 4 weeks quantification of bacterial numbers in stool samples was performed via real time-PCR techniques and questionnaires were filled in to account for potential drawbacks. The genera of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli were taken as potentially beneficial bacteria and those of Bacteroides,Clostridium difficile and Enterococci as potentially non-beneficial, this distinction was dependent on the issue of these numbers being or becoming out of balance in the host. Compared with the negative control the numbers of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli 4 weeks after consumption were significantly higher for gum arabic: the optimal dose being around 10 g. Moreover, at this dose the numbers of Bifidobacteria, Lactobacilli and Bacteroides were significantly higher for gum arabic than for inulin. No significant drawback was encountered during the study. It is concluded that gum arabic establishes prebiotic efficacy, at least as good as inulin. The optimal daily dose was found to be 10 g.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human gut microbes associated with obesity
Ley, R. E., Turnbaugh, P. J., Klein, S., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/4441022a · Cited by 8,785
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.415s · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.nut.2005.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1079/BJN2001394 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/jn/129.7.1442S · DOI
- 10.1093/jn/129.7.1431S · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3109/00365529309096081 · DOI
- 10.3109/00365529409094863 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02654.x · DOI · Paper page
- Williams, 2000, Handbook of Hydrocolloids, 155
- 10.1093/jn/127.1.137 · DOI
- 10.1177/153537020422900905 · doi:10.1177/153537020422900905
- 10.1079/BJN19860033 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0007114599001622 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/anae.1998.0178 · DOI
- 10.1079/BJN2002827 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02409.x · DOI · Paper page
- Guiot, 1982, Role of competition for substrate in bacterial antagonism in the gut, Infect Immun, 38, 887, 10.1128/IAI.38.3.887-892.1982 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature05414 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/08910600310014377 · DOI
- 10.1136/gut.2003.037580 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3109/08910609209141296 · doi:10.3109/08910609209141296
- 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01782.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/jn/128.1.11 · DOI · Paper page
- Gibson, 1995, Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics, J Nutr, 125, 1401, 10.1093/jn/125.6.1401 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/jn/137.3.830S · DOI · Paper page
- Annison, 1995, Feeding Australian acacia gums and gum arabic leads to non-starch polysaccharide accumulation in the cecum of rats, J Nutr, 125, 283
- 10.1128/AEM.70.1.167-173.2004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/AEM.70.7.4165-4169.2004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2531962 · DOI · Paper page
- Armitage, 1971, Statistical Methods in Medical Research
- 10.1093/ajcn/75.5.789 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Fiber and prebiotics: Mechanisms and health benefits
Slavin, J. (2013) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu5041417 · Cited by 2,340
So, D., Whelan, K., Rossi, M., Morrison, M., Holtmann, G., Kelly, J. T., Shanahan, E. R., Staudacher, H. M., & Campbell, K. L. (2018) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqy041 · Cited by 683
Dietary Fiber Intake and Gut Microbiota in Human Health
Fu, J., Zheng, Y., Gao, Y., & Xu, W. (2022) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms10122507 · Cited by 394
Soluble Dietary Fiber, One of the Most Important Nutrients for the Gut Microbiota
Guan, Z.-W., Yu, E.-Z., & Feng, Q. (2021) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules26226802 · Cited by 336
The bifidogenic effect of inulin and oligofructose and its consequences for gut health
Meyer, D., & Stasse-Wolthuis, M. (2009) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/ejcn.2009.64 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Calame, W., Weseler, A. R., Viebke, C., Flynn, C., & Siemensma, A. D.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1269-1275
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W1970931764
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gum arabic establishes prebiotic functionality in healthy human volunteers in a dose-dependent manner. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0007114508981447
- The paper
- Calame, W., Weseler, A. R., Viebke, C., Flynn, C., & Siemensma, A. D. (2008). Gum arabic establishes prebiotic functionality in healthy human volunteers in a dose-dependent manner. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114508981447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.