Cited by 415Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Cannabis dependence and psychotic symptoms in young people

FERGUSSON, D. M., HORWOOD, L. J., SWAIN-CAMPBELL, N. R.·2003·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aims of this research were to use data gathered over the course of a 21 year longitudinal study to examine the linkages between cannabis dependence at ages 18 and 21 and rates of psychotic symptoms taking into account previous symptom levels and other confounding factors. METHOD: Data were gathered during the course of the Christchurch Health and Development Study (CHDS). The CHDS is a longitudinal study of a birth cohort of 1,265 children who have been studied from birth to age 21. As part of this study, data were gathered on cannabis dependence and psychotic symptoms at ages 18 and 21. RESULTS: Young people meeting DSM-IV criteria for cannabis dependence had elevated rates of psychotic symptoms at ages 18 (rate ratio = 3.7; 95% CI 2.8-5.0; P < 0.0001) and 21 (rate ratio = 2.3; 95% CI 1.7-3.2; P < 0.0001). These associations were adjusted for previous psychotic symptoms and a range of other confounding factors using a generalized estimating equation model. This analysis showed that after adjustment for confounding factors, those meeting criteria for cannabis dependence still had an increased rate of psychotic symptoms (rate ratio = 1.8; 95 % CI 1.2-2.6; P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the development of cannabis dependence is associated with increased rates of psychotic symptoms in young people even when pre-existing symptoms and other background factors are taken into account.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291702006402

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Christchurch Health and Development study found evidence of an association between cannabis dependence and psychotic experiences after adjustment for numerous potential confounders.

    “The Christchurch Health and Development study found evidence of an association between cannabis dependence and psychotic experiences after adjustment for numerous potential confounders (17,18).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FERGUSSON, D. M., HORWOOD, L. J., & SWAIN-CAMPBELL, N. R.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2003-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
15-21
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2154438786
Cited by
415
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 19
FWCI
15.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
cannabis use disorder, psychotic symptoms, youth, adolescent substance use, psychosis risk, Christchurch Health and Development Study, longitudinal cohort, confounding adjustment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Marijuana Abuse, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, New Zealand, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Causality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review