Cited by 347COVID-19 and Mental HealthLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Psychological distress and negative appraisals in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)

CHENG, S. K. W., WONG, C. W., TSANG, J., WONG, K. C.·2004·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a novel disease. The authors have limited knowledge of its impact on mental health. The present study aimed to examine the level and extent of psychological distress of SARS survivors following 1-month recovery, to explore patients' negative appraisals of the impact of SARS, and to evaluate the associations between psychological distress and negative appraisals. Method. The Beck Anxiety Inventory, the Beck Depression Inventory, and a newly developed measure, the SARS Impact Scale (SIS), were mailed to 453 Hong Kong Chinese SARS survivors discharged from hospital for 4 weeks or more. Results. A total of 425 patients received the questionnaires and 180 (mean age 36·9 years; 120 women) gave valid replies. The response rate was 42·4%. The participants also represented 13·6% of all adult survivors in Hong Kong. About 35% of respondents reported ‘moderate to severe’ or ‘severe’ ranges of anxiety and/or depressive symptoms. It was found that those working as healthcare workers or having family members killed by SARS were more prone to develop subsequent high levels of distress. Factor analyses extracted three meaningful factors of the SIS, namely ‘survival threat’, ‘physical impact’, and ‘social impact’. Negative appraisals at the acute phase and 1-month recovery significantly accounted for substantial portions of variances for anxiety and depressive symptoms, after the effects of other psychosocial variables were controlled. Conclusions. Psychological distress of SARS survivors at 1-month recovery is real and significant. Negative appraisals may play a pivotal role in the development of psychological distress for SARS survivors, at least in the short term.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291704002272

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CHENG, S. K. W., WONG, C. W., TSANG, J., & WONG, K. C.
Affiliations
Kwai Chung Hospital (CN)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2004-10
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
1187-1195
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2066347032
Cited by
347
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
SARS, SARS survivors, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, negative appraisals, survival threat, social impact, healthcare workers, post-discharge recovery, Hong Kong Chinese
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Sick Role, Survivors, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review