Cited by 29Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Is Worse Attention a Risk Factor for or a Consequence of Depression, or Are Worse Attention and Depression Better Accounted for by Stress? A Prospective Test of Three Hypotheses

Open access
Mac Giollabhui, Naoise, Olino, Thomas M., Nielsen, Johanna, Abramson, Lyn Y., Alloy, Lauren B.·2019·Clinical Psychological Science

Abstract

It is unclear whether impaired cognition is a risk factor for depression or a consequence of depression, or whether both depression and impaired cognition are caused by a third underlying process (e.g., stress). These three hypotheses were tested in 523 adolescents assessed annually for depression, attentional functioning, and childhood/recent life stress. Baseline switching, sustained, and selective attention did not predict first onset of depression or depressive symptoms. Divided attention predicted depressive symptoms only. Piecewise growth modeling indicated that the trajectory of switching attention declined prior to first onset of depression; there was evidence of significant recovery in switching attention following first onset of depression. Structural equation modeling indicated that impaired switching attention prospectively predicted higher depressive symptoms and that higher depressive symptoms predicted worse selective and switching attention. Further, childhood stress prospectively predicted higher depressive symptoms via switching attention and worse switching attention via depressive symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2167702618794920

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher depressive symptoms at baseline also predicted worse selective attention at follow-up.

    “but higher depressive symptoms at baseline also predicted worse selective attention at follow-up”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [163]

  • Baseline divided attention performance predicted depressive symptoms at follow-up.

    “Specifically, baseline-divided attention performance predicted depressive symptoms at follow-up”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [163]

  • Giollabhui et al. used a longitudinal sample to investigate selective, sustained, and divided attention, and showed that the interactions among these pathways may be complex.

    “Giollabhui et al.163 used a longitudinal sample to investigate selective, sustained, and divided attention, and showed that the interactions among these pathways may be complex.”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [163]

  • Childhood stress predicted both higher depressive symptoms and worse attention.

    “and childhood stress predicted both higher depressive symptoms and worse attention.”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [163]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Orvaschel H (1995). Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Epidemiologic Version, Fifth Edition (K-SADS-E).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mac Giollabhui, N., Olino, T. M., Nielsen, J., Abramson, L. Y., & Alloy, L. B.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, Temple University
  • Temple University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Alloy, Lauren B.
Venue
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2018-09-20
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
93-109
ISSN
  • 2167-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-7034
OpenAlex
W2892273862
Cited by
29
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH079369, MH101168)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
depression, attentional shift, selective attention, divided attention, childhood stress, life events, cognitive impairment, adolescents, depressive symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review