Cited by 156Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Identifying a consistent pattern of neural function in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis

McCarthy, H., Skokauskas, N., Frodl, T.·2014·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: The neurobiological underpinnings of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are inconclusive. Activation abnormalities across brain regions in ADHD compared with healthy controls highlighted in task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies are heterogeneous. To identify a consistent pattern of neural dysfunction in ADHD, a meta-analysis of fMRI studies using Go/no-go, Stop and N-back tasks was undertaken. Method: Several databases were searched using the key words: ‘ADHD and fMRI’ and ‘ADHD and fMRI task’. In all, 20 studies met inclusion criteria comprising 334 patients with ADHD and 372 healthy controls and were split into N-back, Stop task and Go/no-go case–control groups. Using Signed Differential Mapping each batch was meta-analysed individually and meta-regression analyses were used to examine the effects of exposure to methylphenidate (MPH), length of MPH wash-out period, ADHD subtype, age and intelligence quotient (IQ) differences upon neural dysfunction in ADHD. Results: Across all tasks less activity in frontal lobe regions compared with controls was detected. Less exposure to treatment and lengthier wash-out times resulted in less left medial frontal cortex activation in N-back and Go/no-go studies. Higher percentage of combined-type ADHD resulted in less superior and inferior frontal gyrus activation. Different IQ scores between groups were linked to reduced right caudate activity in ADHD. Conclusions: Consistent frontal deficits imply homogeneous cognitive strategies involved in ADHD behavioural control. Our findings suggest a link between fMRI results and the potentially normalizing effect of treatment and signify a need for segregated examination and contrast of differences in sample characteristics in future studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291713001037

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A Stop task fMRI meta-analysis based on five pediatric and one adult fMRI studies confirmed that 74 ADHD relative to 102 controls had reduced activation in bilateral IFC/insula, but showed additionally reduced activation in right superior and middle frontal cortices.

    “The Stop task fMRI meta-analysis, based on five pediatric and one adult fMRI studies, confirmed the previous meta-analytical findings that 74 ADHD relative to 102 controls had reduced activation in bilateral IFC/insula, but showed additionally reduced activation in right superior and middle frontal cortices (McCarthy et al., 2014).”
  • A meta-analysis of N-back WM fMRI studies showed that 111 ADHD patients relative to 113 controls had reduced activation in bilateral middle and superior PFC and left MFC/ACC.

    “A meta-analysis of N-back WM fMRI studies showed that 111 ADHD patients relative to 113 controls had reduced activation in bilateral middle and superior PFC and left MFC/ACC (McCarthy et al., 2014).”
  • For the Go/no-go task, 149 ADHD patients had reduced activation relative to 159 healthy controls in predominantly left MFC/ACC and right caudate cortices.

    “For the Go/no-go task, 149 ADHD patients had reduced activation relative to 159 healthy controls in predominantly left medial frontal cortex (MFC)/ACC and right caudate cortices (McCarthy et al., 2014)”
  • Meta-analyses of fMRI studies of inhibitory control find most consistently reduced activation in right, left or bilateral IFC, MFC/ACC/SMA and striato-thalamic regions, with some studies also finding DLPFC underactivation.

    “In conclusion, meta-analyses of fMRI studies of inhibitory control find most consistently reduced activation in right, left or bilateral IFC, MFC/ACC/SMA and striato-thalamic regions with some studies also finding DLPFC underactivation (Hart et al., 2013; McCarthy et al., 2014; Lei et al., 2015; Norman et al., 2016).”
  • Combined-type ADHD relative to the inattentive subtype had more severe underactivation in right superior and IFC during the Stop task, in right caudate during the Go/no-go task, and in right cerebellum during the WM task.

    “combined-type ADHD relative to the inattentive subtype had more severe underactivation in right superior and IFC during the Stop task, in right caudate during the Go/no-go task and in right cerebellum during the WM task.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCarthy, H., Skokauskas, N., & Frodl, T.
Affiliations
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Frodl, T.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2013-05-13
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
869-880
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2153211018
Cited by
156
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 5
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Research Board
  • Science Foundation Ireland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, neural dysfunction, frontal lobe dysfunction, medial frontal cortex, n-back task, go/no-go task, stop-signal task, methylphenidate, washout period, combined type ADHD, caudate nucleus, IQ differences, cognitive control, brain activation
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Humans, Prefrontal Cortex, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review