The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining the profile of high-potency cannabis and its association with severity of cannabis dependence
Open accessAbstract
Background: Cannabis use is decreasing in England and Wales, while demand for cannabis treatment in addiction services continues to rise. This could be partly due to an increased availability of high-potency cannabis. Method: Adults residing in the UK were questioned about their drug use, including three types of cannabis (high potency: skunk; low potency: other grass, resin). Cannabis types were profiled and examined for possible associations between frequency of use and (i) cannabis dependence, (ii) cannabis-related concerns. Results: Frequent use of high-potency cannabis predicted a greater severity of dependence [days of skunk use per month: b = 0.254, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.161–0.357, p < 0.001] and this effect became stronger as age decreased (b = −0.006, 95% CI −0.010 to −0.002, p = 0.004). By contrast, use of low-potency cannabis was not associated with dependence (days of other grass use per month: b = 0.020, 95% CI −0.029 to 0.070, p = 0.436; days of resin use per month: b = 0.025, 95% CI −0.019 to 0.067, p = 0.245). Frequency of cannabis use (all types) did not predict severity of cannabis-related concerns. High-potency cannabis was clearly distinct from low-potency varieties by its marked effects on memory and paranoia. It also produced the best high, was preferred, and most available. Conclusions: High-potency cannabis use is associated with an increased severity of dependence, especially in young people. Its profile is strongly defined by negative effects (memory, paranoia), but also positive characteristics (best high, preferred type), which may be important when considering clinical or public health interventions focusing on cannabis potency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects.
Russo, E. B. (2011) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01238.x · Cited by 1,535
Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences
FIELD, M., & COX, W. (2008) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.030 · Cited by 1,376
High-potency cannabis and the risk of psychosis
Di Forti, M., Morgan, C., Dazzan, P., Pariante, C., Mondelli, V., Marques, T. R., Handley, R., Luzi, S., Russo, M., Paparelli, A., et al. (2009) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.109.064220 · Cited by 567
Morgan, C. J. A., Schafer, G., Freeman, T. P., & Curran, H. V. (2010) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.110.077503 · Cited by 305
Effects of cannabidiol on schizophrenia-like symptoms in people who use cannabis
Morgan, C. J. A., & Curran, H. V. (2008) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.046649 · Cited by 300
Morgan, C. J., Freeman, T. P., Schafer, G. L., & Curran, H. V. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2010.58 · Cited by 196 · cited 3×
“For example, CBD can block or dampen the effects of THC across a range of domains (Zuardi et al. 1982; Morgan & Curran, 2008; Morgan et al. 2010a,b, 2012; Englund et al. 2012; Hindocha et al. 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMorgan, C. J. A., Gardener, C., Schafer, G., Swan, S., Demarchi, C., Freeman, T. P., Warrington, P., Rupasinghe, I., Ramoutar, A., Tan, N., et al. (2012) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291711001322 · Cited by 195
Crippa, J. A. S., Hallak, J. E. C., Machado-de-Sousa, J. P., Queiroz, R. H. C., Bergamaschi, M., Chagas, M. H. N., & Zuardi, A. W. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/jcpt.12018 · Cited by 101
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.11.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/17459261211286645 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03130.x · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03130.x
- 10.1080/13556210500123217 · DOI · Paper page
- King, 2004, EMCDDA INSIGHTS - An Overview of Cannabis Potency in Europe
- 2014, Adult Drug Statistics from the National Drug Treatment Monitoring System (NDTMS)
- 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00603.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/add.12508 · DOI
- 10.1111/add.12634 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.npp.1300496 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00213-002-1169-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/schbul/sbt181 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00117-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb02199.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0269881112460109 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.g3382 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00432554 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00213-003-1484-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Tanda, 2000, Self-administration behavior is maintained by the psychoactive ingredient of marijuana in squirrel monkeys, Nature neuroscience, 3, 1073, 10.1038/80577 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/dta.1531 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.06.009 · DOI · Paper page
- Hardwick, 2008, Home Office Cannabis Potency Study 2008
- 2015, Young People's Statistics from the National Drug Treatment Monitoring System (NDTMS)
- 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.931116816.x · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
The pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids
Lucas, C. J., Galettis, P., & Schneider, J. (2018) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.13710 · Cited by 724
Keep off the grass? Cannabis, cognition and addiction
Curran, H. V., Freeman, T. P., Mokrysz, C., Lewis, D. A., Morgan, C. J. A., & Parsons, L. H. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.28 · Cited by 389
Self-citationSmart, R., Caulkins, J. P., Kilmer, B., Davenport, S., & Midgette, G. (2017) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.13886 · Cited by 369
The cannabis withdrawal syndrome: current insights
Bonnet, U., & Preuss, U. (2017) · Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation · doi:10.2147/sar.s109576 · Cited by 221
Association of High-Potency Cannabis Use With Mental Health and Substance Use in Adolescence
Hines, L. A., Freeman, T. P., Gage, S. H., Zammit, S., Hickman, M., Cannon, M., Munafo, M., MacLeod, J., & Heron, J. (2020) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1035 · Cited by 208
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Freeman, T. P., & Winstock, A. R.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2015-07-27
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3181-3189
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2155491219
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 15.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining the profile of high-potency cannabis and its association with severity of cannabis dependence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291715001178
- The paper
- Freeman, T. P., & Winstock, A. R. (2015). Examining the profile of high-potency cannabis and its association with severity of cannabis dependence. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291715001178
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.