Cited by 47Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Traumatic Brain Injury Research

Possible Detrimental Effects of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Heins, Marianne J., Knoop, Hans, Prins, Judith B., Stulemeijer, Maja, van der Meer, Jos W.M., Bleijenberg, Gijs·2010·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

Background: Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) can decrease the level of fatigue and disabilities, but it has been suggested that during therapy some patients experience a deterioration of their symptoms rather than an improvement. The aim of this study is to examine the frequency and severity of symptom deterioration during CBT for CFS. Methods: Data from 3 randomised controlled trials on CBT for CFS were pooled and reanalysed. Symptom deterioration during the trial was rated by patients and measured as deterioration in fatigue, pain, functional impairment and psychological distress. Both the frequency and severity of deterioration in these domains were compared between the patients receiving CBT and those in the control group. Predictors of symptom deterioration were identified by comparing their means in patients with and without an increase in fatigue. Statistically significant predictors were then combined in a logistic regression model. Results: The frequency of symptom deterioration varied from 2 to 12% in patients receiving CBT and from 7 to 17% in the control group. None of the measures showed a significantly higher frequency of symptom deterioration in the CBT group. The severity of deterioration was also comparable in the CBT and in the control group. No predictors of symptom deterioration specific to CBT were found. Conclusion: Patients receiving CBT do not experience more frequent or more severe symptom deterioration than untreated patients. The reported deterioration during CBT seems to reflect the natural variation in symptoms. Thus, CBT is not only a helpful, but also a safe treatment for CFS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000315130

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heins, M. J., Knoop, H., Prins, J. B., Stulemeijer, M., van der Meer, J. W. M., & Bleijenberg, G.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • VieCuri Medisch Centrum (NL)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2010
Volume
79
Issue
4
Pages
249-256
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2043503304
Cited by
47
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, cognitive behavioral therapy, symptom deterioration, fatigue, pain, functional disability, psychological distress, treatment safety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Self-Help Groups, Severity of Illness Index, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Odds Ratio, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review