CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 745Categorization, perception, and languageNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage, Metaphor, and Cognition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 294 of the 294 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The cognitive functions of language

Open access
Carruthers, Peter·2002·Behavioral and Brain Sciences
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x02000122
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This paper explores a variety of different versions of the thesis that natural language is involved in human thinking. It distinguishes amongst strong and weak forms of this thesis, dismissing some as implausibly strong and others as uninterestingly weak. Strong forms dismissed include the view that language is conceptually necessary for thought (endorsed by many philosophers) and the view that language is de facto the medium of all human conceptual thinking (endorsed by many philosophers and social scientists). Weak forms include the view that language is necessary for the acquisition of many human concepts and the view that language can serve to scaffold human thought processes. The paper also discusses the thesis that language may be the medium of conscious propositional thinking, but argues that this cannot be its most fundamental cognitive role. The idea is then proposed that natural language is the medium for non-domain-specific thinking, serving to integrate the outputs of a variety of domain-specific conceptual faculties (or central-cognitive “quasi-modules”). Recent experimental evidence in support of this idea is reviewed and the implications of the idea are discussed, especially for our conception of the architecture of human cognition. Finally, some further kinds of evidence which might serve to corroborate or refute the hypothesis are mentioned. The overall goal of the paper is to review a wide variety of accounts of the cognitive function of natural language, integrating a number of different kinds of evidence and theoretical consideration in order to propose and elaborate the most plausible candidate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0140525x02000122

Cites

294 of 294 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 81

  1. Almor, A. (in press) Specialised behaviour without specialised modules. In: Evolution and the psychology of thinking, ed. D. E. Over. Psychology Press.
  2. Astington, J. (1996) What is theoretical about the child's theory of mind? In: Theories of theories of mind, ed. P. Carruthers & P. K. Smith. Cambridge University Press.
  3. 2002) An experimental approach to the cognitive basis of science: Universal and cultural factors in biological understanding. In: The cognitive basis of science, ed. P. Carruthers, S. Stich and M. Siegal. Cambridge University Press.
  4. in press) Modest adaptationism (commentary). Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
  5. Balaban, M. & Waxman, S. (1997) Words may facilitate categorization in 9-month- old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 64:3 -26.
  6. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995) Mindblindness. MIT Press.
  7. Baumeister, R. F. (in press) The cultural animal: Human nature, meaning, and social life. Oxford University Press.
  8. Bolinger, D. (1975) Aspects of language, 2nd edition. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  9. Bowerman, M. & Choi, S. (2001) Shaping meanings for language: Universal and language-specific in the acquisition and shaping of semantic categories. In: Language acquisition and conceptual development, ed. M. Bowerman & S. Levinson. Cambridge University Press. [AC, DIS]
  10. Byrne, R. & Whiten, A., eds. (1988) Machiavellian intelligence. Oxford University Press.
  11. 1998) Machiavellian intelligence II: Evaluations and extensions. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Baddeley, J. P. Aggleton & M. A. Conway. Oxford University Press.
  13. De Villiers, J. (2000) Language and theory of mind: What is the developmental relationship? In: Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism and developmental cognitive neuroscience, ed. S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg & D. Cohen. Cambridge University Press.
  14. Whorf?, ed. D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow. MIT Press.
  15. De Waal, F. (1982) Chimpanzee politics. Jonathan Cape. [aPC] (1996) Good natured. Harvard University Press.
  16. Dehaene, S. (1997) The number sense. Oxford University Press.
  17. 1991) Consciousness explained. Penguin Press. [aPC, GO] (1991) Consciousness explained. Little, Brown. [JJB, KF, PPS]
  18. Dickinson, A. (1994) Instrumental conditioning. In: Animal learning and cognition, ed. N. Mackintosh. Academic Press.
  19. 1998) Mimesis and the executive suite: Missing links in language evolution. In: Approaches to the evolution of language, ed. J. R. Hurford, M. G. Studdert- Kennedy & C. Knight. Cambridge University Press. [BM] (2001)
  20. Emmorey, K. (1998) Mental rotation within linguistic and nonlinguistic domains in users of American Sign Language. Cognition 68(3):221-46.
  21. 1964a) An analysis of the interaction of language, topic and listener. American Anthropologist 66(6): 86-102 (special publication: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes). [SH] (1964b) Language and TAT content in bilinguals. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68:500-507.
  22. Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. H. & Over, D. E. (in press) Conditionals and conditional probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition.
  23. Evans, J. St. B. T. & Over, D. E. (1996) Rationality and reasoning. Psychology Press.
  24. Evans, J. St. B. T., Over, D. E. & Handley, S. H. (in press) A theory of hypothetical thinking. In: Decision making and reasoning, ed. D. Hardman & L. Maachi. Wiley. [JSBTE]
  25. rPC, NC, JGdV, CP] (1980) On the impossibility of acquiring "more powerful" structures. In: Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, ed. M. Piattelli-Palmarini. Harvard University Press. [NC] (1981) The present status of the innateness controversy. In: Representations. Harvester Press.
  26. aPC, KF, TW] (in press) Mind and supermind. Manuscript.
  27. Frege, G. (1918/1979) The thought. In: Posthumous writings, trans. P. Long & R. White. Blackwell. [rPC]
  28. Gibbs, R., Lima, P. & Francuzo, E. (in press) Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics.
  29. Gigerenzer, G. & Todd, P. (2000) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.
  30. Gouteux, S., Thinus-Blanc, C. & Vauclair, S. (in press) Rhesus monkeys use geometric and non-geometric information during a reorientation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Gen. Proc. 130:505-19.
  31. 2002) What do children learn from testimony? In: The cognitive basis of science, ed. P. Carruthers, S. Stich & M. Siegal. Cambridge University Press.
  32. Hauser, M. (2000) Wild minds. Penguin Press.
  33. Hauser, M. & Carey, S. (1998) Building a cognitive creature from a set of primitives. In: The evolution of mind, ed. D. Cummins & C. Allen. Oxford University Press.
  34. 2000b) Natural language use in habitual propositional-type thought: Support from Japanese-English and English-Japanese bilingual covert codeswitching data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London. [British Library shelf mark DX217428.]
  35. Hermer, L. (1993) Increases in cognitive flexibility over development and evolution: Candidate mechanisms. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society.
  36. Higginbotham, J. (1995) Sense and syntax. Oxford University Press. (An inaugural lecture delivered before the University of Oxford on October 20, 1994.)
  37. Horgan T. & Tienson, J. (1996) Connectionism and philosophy of psychology. MIT Press.
  38. Hughes, L. (1993) ChimpWorld: A wind-tunnel for the social sciences. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.
  39. 1997) The architecture of the language faculty. MIT Press.
  40. CM, PPS] (2002) Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar and evolution. Oxford University Press. [SH, CM]
  41. Jellinek, A. (1977) The lower Paleolithic. Annual Review of Anthropology, 6:1-32.
  42. aPC, JSBTE] (1996) Space to think. In: Language and Space, ed. P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. F. Garret. MIT Press. [PFD]
  43. Kertesz, A. (1988) Cognitive function in severe aphasia. In: Thought without language, ed. L. Weiskrantz. Oxford University Press.
  44. Koslowski, B. (1996) Theory and evidence. MIT Press.
  45. Kosslyn, S. (1994) Image and brain. MIT Press.
  46. Larson, R. & Segal, G. (1995) Knowledge of language: An introduction to semantic theory. MIT Press.
  47. Li, P., Farkas, I. & MacWhinney, B. (in press) The origin of categorical representations of language in the brain. Cognitive Science.
  48. Lobe, C. G. & Nagy, A. 1998. Conditional genome alteration in mice. Bioessays 20(3):200-8.
  49. 1992b) Grammatical categories and cognition: A case-study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge University Press.
  50. Lucy, J. & Gaskins, S. (2001) Grammatical categories and development of classification preferences: A comparative approach. In: Language acquisition and conceptual development, ed. M. Bowerman & S. Levinson. Cambridge University Press. [aPC, AC]
  51. B. Malle & T. Givón. Benjamins. [BM] (in press) Perspective taking and grammar. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
  52. Marcus, G. (2001) The algebraic mind. MIT Press.
  53. Medin, D. & Ortony, A. (1989) Psychological essentialism. In: Similarity and analogical reasoning, ed. S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony. Cambridge University Press.
  54. Nisbett, R. & Ross, L. (1980) Human inference. Prentice Hall.
  55. Nisbett, R. & Wilson, T. (1977) Telling more than we can know. Psychological Review 84:231-95.
  56. Over, D. E. & Evans, J. St. B. T. (in press) The probability of conditionals: The psychological evidence. Mind and Language. [JSBTE]
  57. Parsons, T. (1990) Events in the semantics of English. MIT Press.
  58. Pinker, S. (1994) The language instinct. Penguin Press.
  59. Place, U. T. (1956) Is consciousness a brain process? In: The philosophy of mind: Classical problems/contemporary issues, ed. B. Beakley & P. Ludlow. MIT Press.
  60. Premack, D. (1986) Gavagai! Or, the future history of the ape language controversy. MIT Press.
  61. Pylyshyn, Z. (1973) What the mind's eye tells the mind's brain. Psychological Bulletin 80:1-24.
  62. Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L. & Gallese, V. (2000). Cortical mechanisms subserving object grasping and action recognition: A new view on the cortical motor functions. In: The new cognitive neurosciences, 2nd edition, ed.
  63. Rumelhart, D. & McClelland, J. (1986) Parallel distributed processing. MIT Press.
  64. in press) A protocol analysis of retrieval in autobiographical memory. International Journal of Bilingualism.
  65. SH, RWS] (in press). On the bilingual's two sets of memories. In: Connecting culture and memory: The development of an autobiographical self, ed. R. Fivush & C. Haden. Erlbaum.
  66. Scribner, S. (1985) Vygotsky's use of history. In: Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives, ed. J. Wertsch. Cambridge University Press.
  67. P. Carruthers & J. Boucher. Cambridge University Press. [aPC, JGdV]
  68. 2002b) The tripartite model of representation. Philosophical Psychology 15(3):239-70.
  69. in press) Mental imagery: Déjà-vu all over again? (Commentary on Pylyshyn.) Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
  70. D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow. MIT Press. [DIS] (in press) Language and thought on line: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In: Advances in the investigation of language and thought, ed.
  71. D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow. MIT Press.
  72. M. Bowerman & S. Levinson. Cambridge University Press.
  73. LH-V, GV] (2003) Modularity as a fish views it: Conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, in press.
  74. in press) Developing knowledge of space: Core systems and new combinations. In: Languages of the brain, ed. S. Kosslyn & A. Galaburda. Harvard University Press.
  75. Sperber, D., Premack, D. & Premack, A., eds. (1995) Causal cognition. Oxford University Press.
  76. 1995) Relevance, 2nd edition. Basil Blackwell. [JSBTE] (2002) Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind and Language 17:3-23.
  77. Thornton, R. (1996) Elicited production. In: Methods for assessing children's syntax, ed. D. McDaniel, C. McKee & H. Cairns. MIT Press.
  78. Vallortigara, G., Zanforlin, M. & Pasti, G. (1990) Geometric modules in animal's spatial representations: A test with chicks. Journal of Comparative Psychology 104:248-54.
  79. aPC, GO, KN, CP] (1986) Thought and language, revised edition. MIT Press.
  80. Walker, S. (1983) Animal thought. Routledge.
  81. R. Sussex & J. Zubrzucki. Australian National University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 745

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Carruthers, P.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Carruthers, Peter
ORCID
Carruthers, Peter
Venue
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2002-12
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
657-674
ISSN
  • 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1825
DOI
10.1017/s0140525x02000122
OpenAlex
W2122293562
Cited by
728
References
290
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 38
FWCI
34.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 253 d)
Locations
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University Libraries (University of Maryland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Keywords
language and thought, conceptual thinking, conscious thought, natural language
MeSH terms
Cognition, Consciousness, Cultural Evolution, Humans, Intelligence, Language, Logic, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review