Cited by 51Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesEarly Childhood Education and Development

Individual differences in anxiety trajectories from Grades 2 to 8: Impact of the middle school transition

Open access
Nelemans, Stefanie A., Hale, William W., Branje, Susan J. T., Meeus, Wim H. J., Rudolph, Karen D.·2018·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

This study examined the impact of the middle school transition on general anxiety trajectories from middle childhood to middle adolescence, as well as how youths' individual vulnerability and exposure to contextual stressors were associated with anxiety trajectories. Participants were 631 youth (47% boys, M age = 7.96 years at Time 1), followed for 7 successive years from second to eighth grade. Teachers reported on youths' individual vulnerability to anxiety (anxious solitude) in second grade; youth reported on their anxiety in second to eighth grade and aspects of their social contexts particularly relevant to the school transition (school hassles, peer victimization, parent-child relationship quality, and friendship quality) in sixth to eighth grade. The results revealed two subgroups that showed either strongly increasing (5%) or decreasing (14%) levels of anxiety across the transition and two subgroups with fairly stable levels of either high (11%) or low (70%) anxiety over time. Youth in the latter two subgroups could be distinguished based on their individual vulnerability to anxiety, whereas youth with increasing anxiety reported more contextual stressors and less contextual support than youth with decreasing anxiety. In sum, findings suggest that the middle school transition has the potential to alter developmental trajectories of anxiety for some youth, for better or for worse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579417001584

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelemans, S. A., Hale, W. W., Branje, S. J. T., Meeus, W. H. J., & Rudolph, K. D.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Nelemans, Stefanie A.
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2017-11-21
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
1487-1501
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2769963519
Cited by
51
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
anxiety trajectories, middle school transition, individual differences, contextual stressors, peer victimization, parent-child relationship, friendship quality, middle childhood, middle adolescence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Child, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Peer Group, Schools, Social Behavior, Friends, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review