Cited by 142Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseMental Health Treatment and Access

Mental disorders in elderly suicide

Open access
Henriksson, Markus M., Marttunen, Mauri J., Isometsä, Erkki T., Heikkinen, Martti E., Aro, Hillevi M., Kuoppasalmi, Kimmo I., Lönnqvist, Jouko K.·1995·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and comorbidity of current mental disorders defined by DSM-III-R among elderly suicide victims and to compare them with the mental disorders among younger victims. Using a psychological autopsy method, we collected comprehensive data on all suicides in Finland during 1 year. Retrospective Axis I-III consensus diagnoses were assigned to a random sample consisting of 43 victims aged 60 years or over and 186 victims aged under 60 from the nationwide suicide population. At least one Axis I diagnosis was made for 91% of the elderly victims. Major depression as the principal diagnosis was more common among the elderly victims. Almost all elderly female victims were major depressives. Psychiatric comorbidity was more common among elderly male than among elderly female victims. More of the elderly victims (88%) than the younger (36%) received Axis III diagnoses. Suicide among the elderly without a diagnosable mental disorder and somatopsychiatric comorbidity seems to be rare.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610295002031

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological autopsy case-control studies provide remarkably consistent findings.

    “a variety of investigators have applied it in case control studies that provide remarkably consistent findings (7-21).”

    From Suicide in older adults (2011) · cites this paper as [13]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henriksson, M. M., Marttunen, M. J., Isometsä, E. T., Heikkinen, M. E., Aro, H. M., Kuoppasalmi, K. I., & Lönnqvist, J. K.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-06
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
275-286
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067331718
Cited by
142
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
elderly suicide, mental illness, psychiatric comorbidity, major depressive disorder, psychological autopsy, prevalence of mental disorders, sex differences, age differences, DSM-III-R
MeSH terms
Aged, Mental Disorders, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Suicide, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review