Cited by 74Primate Behavior and EcologyChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentMemory Processes and Influences

The future of future-oriented cognition in non-humans: theory and the empirical case of the great apes

Open access
Osvath, Mathias, Martin-Ordas, Gema·2014·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

One of the most contested areas in the field of animal cognition is non-human future-oriented cognition. We critically examine key underlying assumptions in the debate, which is mainly preoccupied with certain dichotomous positions, the most prevalent being whether or not ‘real’ future orientation is uniquely human. We argue that future orientation is a theoretical construct threatening to lead research astray. Cognitive operations occur in the present moment and can be influenced only by prior causation and the environment, at the same time that most appear directed towards future outcomes. Regarding the current debate, future orientation becomes a question of where on various continua cognition becomes ‘truly’ future-oriented. We question both the assumption that episodic cognition is the most important process in future-oriented cognition and the assumption that future-oriented cognition is uniquely human. We review the studies on future-oriented cognition in the great apes to find little doubt that our closest relatives possess such ability. We conclude by urging that future-oriented cognition not be viewed as expression of some select set of skills. Instead, research into future-oriented cognition should be approached more like research into social and physical cognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2013.0486

Cites

61 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These ape studies were conducted without adequate controls to rule out simple associative explanations, unlike the New Caledonian crow study.

    “these studies were importantly conducted without adequate controls to rule out simple associative explanations [169], as were implemented in the New Caledonian crow study ([50]; but see [170]).”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [170]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Tulving E, 2005, The missing link in cognition, 3
  2. Tulving E, 1972, Organization of memory, 381

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osvath, M., & Martin-Ordas, G.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Cognitive Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2014-11-05
Volume
369
Issue
1655
Pages
20130486
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2015065770
Cited by
74
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
future-oriented cognition, animal cognition, great apes, human uniqueness, nonhuman cognition, social cognition, physical cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cognition, Forecasting, Humans, Hominidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review