Cited by 26Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and DisordersHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Executive control in bilingual aphasia: a systematic review

Open access
Mooijman, Saskia, Schoonen, Rob, Roelofs, Ardi, Ruiter, Marina B.·2022·Bilingualism: Language and Cognition

Abstract

Much research has been dedicated to the effects of bilingualism on executive control (EC). For bilinguals with aphasia, the interplay with EC is complex. In this systematic review, we synthesize research on this topic and provide an overview of the current state of the field. First, we examine the evidence for EC deficits in bilingual persons with aphasia (bPWA). We then discuss the domain generality of bilingual language control impairments. Finally, we evaluate the bilingual advantage hypothesis in bPWA. We conclude that (1) EC impairments in bPWA are frequently observed, (2) experimental results on the relationship between linguistic and domain-general control are mixed, (3) bPWA with language control problems in everyday communication have domain-general EC problems, and (4) there are indications for EC advantages in bPWA. We end with directions for experimental work that could provide better insight into the intricate relationship between EC and bilingual aphasia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s136672892100047x

Cites

136 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The role of cognitive function in bilingual aphasia recovery may be even more pronounced, given the increased demands on cognitive control and language selection mechanisms in bilingual language processing.

    “The role of cognitive function in bilingual aphasia recovery may be even more pronounced, given the increased demands on cognitive control and language selection mechanisms in bilingual language processing56.”

    From Machine Learning Predictions of Recovery in Bilingual Poststroke Aphasia: Aligning Insights With Clinical Evidence (2025) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that both languages compete for selection and describes inhibitory control as a way to resolve that competition. The functional-communication section (page unavailable) links executive-control deficits to selective language recovery in bilingual aphasia. The review does not establish the comparative claim that cognitive function plays a more pronounced role in bilingual than in monolingual aphasia recovery. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cognitive skills may be even more crucial in bilingual contexts due to the interaction between heightened EC demands and the neural infrastructure supporting bilingual lexical access.

    “These skills may be even more crucial in bilingual contexts due to the interaction between heightened EC demands and the neural infrastructure supporting bilingual lexical access56,58–60.”

    From Machine Learning Predictions of Recovery in Bilingual Poststroke Aphasia: Aligning Insights With Clinical Evidence (2025) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says both languages compete for selection and reports evidence that executive control and bilingual language control share neural circuits. The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests that better-preserved executive control could help inhibit the non-intended language and improve communication in bilingual people with aphasia. These passages support the proposed importance of cognitive control, but do not establish that it is more crucial in bilingual contexts specifically because of an interaction with neural infrastructure supporting lexical access. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Executive control (EC) interacts with language, and impairments in these functions may lead to difficulties in compensating for linguistic deficits in bilingual people with aphasia (bPWA).

    “Per a recent systematic review of EC in bPWA, EC interacts with language, and impairments in these functions may lead to difficulties in compensating for linguistic deficits in bPWA56.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. jocn_a_00817 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mooijman, S., Schoonen, R., Roelofs, A., & Ruiter, M. B.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Mooijman, Saskia
Venue
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
Published
2021-08-18
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
13-28
ISSN
  • 1366-7289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1841
OpenAlex
W3194296596
Cited by
26
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bilingualism Language and Cognition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
executive function, bilingual aphasia, bilingualism, domain generality, language control, cognitive control deficits, aphasia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review