Cited by 302Vitamin D Research StudiesNutritional Studies and DietNutrition and Health Studies

Plasma concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in meat eaters, fish eaters, vegetarians and vegans: results from the EPIC–Oxford study

Open access
Crowe, Francesca L, Steur, Marinka, Allen, Naomi E, Appleby, Paul N, Travis, Ruth C, Key, Timothy J·2011·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Vegetarians and vegans exclude certain food sources of vitamin D from their diet, but it is not clear to what extent this affects plasma concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D). The objective was to investigate differences in vitamin D intake and plasma concentrations of 25(OH)D among meat eaters, fish eaters, vegetarians and vegans. DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: Plasma 25(OH)D concentrations were measured in 2107 white men and women (1388 meat eaters, 210 fish eaters, 420 vegetarians and eighty-nine vegans) aged 20-76 years from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Oxford cohort. RESULTS: Plasma 25(OH)D concentrations reflected the degree of animal product exclusion and, hence, dietary intake of vitamin D; meat eaters had the highest mean intake of vitamin D (3·1 (95 % CI 3·0, 3·2) μg/d) and mean plasma 25(OH)D concentrations (77·0 (95 % CI 75·4, 78·8) nmol/l) and vegans the lowest (0·7 (95 % CI 0·6, 0·8) μg/d and 55·8 (95 % CI 51·0, 61·0) nmol/l, respectively). The magnitude of difference in 25(OH)D concentrations between meat eaters and vegans was smaller (20 %) among those participants who had a blood sample collected during the summer months (July-September) compared with the winter months (38 %; January-March). The prevalence of low plasma concentrations of 25(OH)D (<25 nmol/l) during the winter and spring ranged from <1 % to 8 % across the diet groups. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma 25(OH)D concentrations were lower in vegetarians and vegans than in meat and fish eaters; diet is an important determinant of plasma 25(OH)D in this British population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980010002454

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UK dietary intake data excluding supplementation show that mean vitamin D intake per day in adult vegans was 0.7 μg compared with 3.1 μg/d in omnivores.

    “Dietary intake data (excluding supplementation) from the United Kingdom show that mean vitamin D intake per day in adult vegans was only 0.7 μg compared with an intake of 3.1 μg/d in omnivores [30].”

    From Nutritional Considerations for the Vegan Athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

  • When controlling for season, year of blood collection, and age, lower dietary vitamin D intake translates to serum 25(OH)D concentrations in meat eaters being approximately 20 nmol/L higher than in vegans.

    “Indeed, when controlling for season, year of blood collection, and age, this considerably lower dietary intake translates to serum 25(OH)D concentrations in meat eaters being considerably (∼20 nmol/L) higher than in vegans [30].”

    From Nutritional Considerations for the Vegan Athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

  • Dietary intakes of vitamin D are low in vegans who do not achieve sufficient sun exposure.

    “Dietary intakes of vitamin D are low in vegans who do not achieve sufficient sun exposure [101].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crowe, F. L., Steur, M., Allen, N. E., Appleby, P. N., Travis, R. C., & Key, T. J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Crowe, Francesca L
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2010-09-21
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
340-346
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2150458065
Cited by
302
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
25-hydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D status, vitamin D intake, meat-eaters, vegetarians, vegans, seasonal variation, vitamin D deficiency
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, England, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Meat, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Seasons, Diet, Vegetarian, Vitamin D, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Seafood, Bone Density Conservation Agents, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review