Cited by 355Nutritional Studies and DietMuscle metabolism and nutritionMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Plasma concentrations and intakes of amino acids in male meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans: a cross-sectional analysis in the EPIC-Oxford cohort

Open access
Schmidt, J A, Rinaldi, S, Scalbert, A, Ferrari, P, Achaintre, D, Gunter, M J, Appleby, P N, Key, T J +1 more·2016·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the differences in plasma concentrations and in intakes of amino acids between male meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the Oxford arm of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. SUBJECTS/METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis included 392 men, aged 30-49 years. Plasma amino acid concentrations were measured with a targeted metabolomic approach using mass spectrometry, and dietary intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire. Differences between diet groups in mean plasma concentrations and intakes of amino acids were examined using analysis of variance, controlling for potential confounding factors and multiple testing. RESULTS: In plasma, concentrations of 6 out of 21 amino acids varied significantly by diet group, with differences of -13% to +16% between meat-eaters and vegans. Concentrations of methionine, tryptophan and tyrosine were highest in fish-eaters and vegetarians, followed by meat-eaters, and lowest in vegans. A broadly similar pattern was seen for lysine, whereas alanine concentration was highest in fish-eaters and lowest in meat-eaters. For glycine, vegans had the highest concentration and meat-eaters the lowest. Intakes of all 18 dietary amino acids differed by diet group; for the majority of these, intake was highest in meat-eaters followed by fish-eaters, then vegetarians and lowest in vegans (up to 47% lower than in meat-eaters). CONCLUSIONS: Men belonging to different habitual diet groups have significantly different plasma concentrations of lysine, methionine, tryptophan, alanine, glycine and tyrosine. However, the differences in plasma concentrations were less marked than and did not necessarily mirror those seen for amino acid intakes.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 392 British men aged 30–49 from EPIC-Oxford, plasma concentrations of 6 of 21 amino acids differed significantly by habitual diet group, but these differences were smaller than and did not closely mirror dietary amino acid intakes. Intakes of all 18 measured dietary amino acids differed by diet group, generally highest in meat-eaters and lowest in vegans.

Key findings

  • Plasma concentrations of lysine, methionine, tryptophan, alanine, glycine and tyrosine varied significantly by diet group after multiple-testing correction, with differences of −13% to +16% between meat-eaters and vegans.
  • Methionine, tryptophan and tyrosine were highest in fish-eaters and vegetarians, followed by meat-eaters, and lowest in vegans; lysine showed a broadly similar pattern, alanine was highest in fish-eaters and lowest in meat-eaters, and glycine was highest in vegans and lowest in meat-eaters (vegans 16% higher than meat-eaters).
  • Intakes of all 18 dietary amino acids differed by diet group (P<0.0001 for all); for most, intake was highest in meat-eaters, then fish-eaters, then vegetarians, and lowest in vegans, with lysine and methionine intakes in vegans at 56% and 53% of those in meat-eaters, respectively.
  • Plasma concentrations and dietary intakes of amino acids were not strongly correlated, although significant positive correlations were found for leucine, lysine, methionine, tryptophan and tyrosine (r≤0.21).

Methods

  • Cross-sectional analysis within EPIC-Oxford including 392 men aged 30–49 years, with 98 participants in each diet group: meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans.
  • Plasma amino acid concentrations were measured with a targeted metabolomic assay (BIOCRATES AbsoluteIDQ p180 Kit, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) quantifying 21 amino acids; dietary intake was assessed with a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire, and 18 amino acid intakes were estimated using the USDA National Nutrient Database.
  • Differences between diet groups in mean plasma concentrations and intakes were tested using analysis of variance, adjusted for age, BMI, smoking status and alcohol intake; plasma models additionally adjusted for time since last food/drink and time between blood collection and processing, intake models adjusted for energy intake, and results were interpreted after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.

Limitations

  • Stated: plasma amino acid measurements could be affected by pre-analytic conditions such as thaw–freeze cycles, and some values were unavailable because of detector signal saturation (e.g., phenylalanine n=93, proline n=45, lysine n=11); the authors note thaw–freeze cycles were independent of diet group and most amino acids are stable over two cycles.
  • Stated: FFQ-based amino acid intakes may be underestimated as more animal foods are omitted, may miss some plant foods or use non-representative portion sizes, and validation showed protein intake was particularly difficult to estimate; matching UK foods to a US nutrient database may also introduce differences in amino acid content.
  • Stated/evident: some correlation analyses had lower power because diet groups with zero intake were excluded; the cross-sectional design and the sample of British men aged 30–49 in EPIC-Oxford limit causal inference and generalizability to other populations.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ejcn.2015.144

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 13 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    No differences between diet groups were observed for the four types of animal products where comparison was possible (fish, dairy, egg and mixed animal products).

    “However, no differences between diet groups were observed for the four types of animal products where comparison was possible (fish, dairy, egg and mixed animal products).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
  • Findingown data

    The six plasma amino acids whose concentrations varied significantly by diet group were lysine, methionine, tryptophan, alanine, glycine and tyrosine.

    “This analysis showed that plasma concentrations of six amino acids, namely lysine, methionine, tryptophan, alanine, glycine and tyrosine, differed by habitual diet group.”
    • Also stated in: § Conclusions: · plain
      “Men belonging to different habitual diet groups have significantly different plasma concentrations of lysine, methionine, tryptophan, alanine, glycine and tyrosine.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
    • Rests on an assumption: The covariates adjusted for are sufficient to control confounding of the diet-group differences in amino acid concentrations and intakes.
  • Findingown data

    Mean plasma glycine concentration in vegans was 16% higher than in meat-eaters.

    “The largest difference was seen for glycine; mean concentration in vegans was 16% higher than in meat-eaters, who had the lowest concentration, with intermediate concentrations for fish-eaters and vegetarians.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
    • Rests on an assumption: The covariates adjusted for are sufficient to control confounding of the diet-group differences in amino acid concentrations and intakes.
  • Findingown data

    For the majority of the 18 amino acids, intake was highest in meat-eaters followed by fish-eaters, then vegetarians and lowest in vegans.

    “Intakes of all 18 dietary amino acids differed by diet group; for the majority of these, intake was highest in meat-eaters followed by fish-eaters, then vegetarians and lowest in vegans (up to 47% lower than in meat-eaters).”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “Meat-eaters had the highest intakes, followed by fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans, except for arginine, aspartate, glycine and proline.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Matching UK foods to the nearest food in the US nutrient database by total protein content yields valid estimates of amino acid intakes for the UK diet groups.
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
    • Rests on an assumption: The covariates adjusted for are sufficient to control confounding of the diet-group differences in amino acid concentrations and intakes.
  • Findingown data

    Intakes of all 18 dietary amino acids differed by diet group (P<0.0001 for all).

    “Estimated mean intakes of all 18 amino acids varied by diet group (P<0.0001 for all; Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Matching UK foods to the nearest food in the US nutrient database by total protein content yields valid estimates of amino acid intakes for the UK diet groups.
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
    • Rests on an assumption: The covariates adjusted for are sufficient to control confounding of the diet-group differences in amino acid concentrations and intakes.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 11
  • May combine two claims. 21
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans had on average followed their diet for 11, 12 and 9 years, respectively.

    “Fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans had on average followed their diet for 11, 12 and 9 years, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Protein from all animal products differed by diet group; it was highest in meat-eaters and lowest in vegetarians (zero in vegans by definition).

    “Protein from all animal products also differed by diet group; it was highest in meat-eaters and lowest in vegetarians (zero in vegans by definition).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    BMI differed by up to 2.3 kg/m2 between diet groups; it was highest in meat-eaters and lowest in vegans.

    “BMI differed by up to 2.3 kg/m2 between diet groups; it was highest in meat-eaters and lowest in vegans (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    For non-soya plant products, only correlations for lysine and tyrosine were significant (inverse).

    “A similar pattern was seen for non-soya plant products, although only correlations for lysine and tyrosine were significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Matching UK foods to the nearest food in the US nutrient database by total protein content yields valid estimates of amino acid intakes for the UK diet groups.
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
    • Rests on an assumption: The covariates adjusted for are sufficient to control confounding of the diet-group differences in amino acid concentrations and intakes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Exceptions to the general intake pattern were arginine, aspartate, glycine and proline; for these, meat-eaters also had the highest intakes, but were followed by vegans for arginine and glycine, with other deviations for aspartate and proline.

    “Meat-eaters had the highest intakes, followed by fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans, except for arginine, aspartate, glycine and proline. For these amino acids, meat-eaters also had the highest intakes, but were followed by vegans for arginine and glycine, whereas other deviations from the above pattern were seen for aspartate and proline.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Matching UK foods to the nearest food in the US nutrient database by total protein content yields valid estimates of amino acid intakes for the UK diet groups.
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
    • Rests on an assumption: The covariates adjusted for are sufficient to control confounding of the diet-group differences in amino acid concentrations and intakes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Plasma glycine concentration was highest in vegans and lowest in meat-eaters.

    “For glycine, vegans had the highest concentration and meat-eaters the lowest.”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “The largest difference was seen for glycine; mean concentration in vegans was 16% higher than in meat-eaters, who had the lowest concentration, with intermediate concentrations for fish-eaters and vegetarians.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
    • Rests on an assumption: The covariates adjusted for are sufficient to control confounding of the diet-group differences in amino acid concentrations and intakes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For intakes of lysine and methionine, vegans had 56% and 53% of meat-eaters' intakes, respectively (i.e., 44% and 47% lower).

    “The largest percentage differences between diet groups were for intakes of lysine and methionine, which in vegans were 56% and 53% of those in meat-eaters, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Matching UK foods to the nearest food in the US nutrient database by total protein content yields valid estimates of amino acid intakes for the UK diet groups.
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
    • Rests on an assumption: The covariates adjusted for are sufficient to control confounding of the diet-group differences in amino acid concentrations and intakes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Plasma lysine concentration followed a broadly similar pattern to methionine, tryptophan and tyrosine, with highest concentrations in fish-eaters and vegetarians, followed by meat-eaters, and lowest in vegans.

    “A broadly similar pattern was seen for lysine”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “For lysine, methionine, tryptophan and tyrosine fish-eaters and vegetarians generally had the highest concentrations, followed by meat-eaters, whereas vegans had the lowest concentrations for all four.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
    • Rests on an assumption: The covariates adjusted for are sufficient to control confounding of the diet-group differences in amino acid concentrations and intakes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Energy intake and percent energy from protein were highest in meat-eaters and lowest in vegans.

    “Similarly, energy intake and percent energy from protein were highest in meat-eaters and lowest in vegans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Plasma alanine concentration was highest in fish-eaters and lowest in meat-eaters.

    “whereas alanine concentration was highest in fish-eaters and lowest in meat-eaters.”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “For alanine, the highest concentration was seen in fish-eaters, followed by vegetarians and vegans, and lowest in meat-eaters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
    • Rests on an assumption: The covariates adjusted for are sufficient to control confounding of the diet-group differences in amino acid concentrations and intakes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Protein from all plant products, non-soya and soya plant products differed by diet group; meat-eaters had the lowest intake, whereas vegans consumed the highest amount.

    “Separating the protein intake by food types revealed differences in percent energy from protein from all plant products, non-soya and soya plant products; meat-eaters had the lowest intake, whereas vegans consumed the highest amount.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Matching UK foods to the nearest food in the US nutrient database by total protein content yields valid estimates of amino acid intakes for the UK diet groups.
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Concentrations of many plasma amino acids were correlated; 62% of the correlations were statistically significant after allowance for multiple testing (-0.23≥r≥0.23; P<0.0002).

    “Concentrations of many of the plasma amino acids were correlated (Figure 1); 62% of the correlations were statistically significant after allowance for multiple testing (–0.23⩾r⩾0.23; P<0.0002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.
    • Rests on an assumption: The covariates adjusted for are sufficient to control confounding of the diet-group differences in amino acid concentrations and intakes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This complex interplay, in addition to the recognised limitations of estimating nutrient intakes using a FFQ, might at least partly explain the differences in results for plasma and dietary amino acids by diet group, as well as the limited strength of correlation between plasma concentrations and intakes.

    “This, in addition to the recognised limitations of estimating nutrient intakes using a FFQ,31 might at least partly explain the differences in our results for plasma and dietary amino acids by diet group, as well as the limited strength of correlation between plasma concentrations and intakes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Samples from each diet group were equally distributed by the number of thaw-freeze cycles.

    “Before the assay for this study, samples had undergone two or three thaw–freeze cycles; samples from each diet group were equally distributed by the number of cycles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Laboratory technicians were blinded to the diet group and the quality control samples.

    “The laboratory technicians were blinded to the diet group and the quality control samples.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    For leucine, valine, histidine, threonine, arginine and citrulline an association was found in previous studies but not in ours, whereas the opposite was the case for methionine, tryptophan, alanine and glycine.

    “For leucine, valine, histidine, threonine, arginine and citrulline an association was found in previous studies but not in ours, whereas the opposite was the case for methionine, tryptophan, alanine and glycine.7, 8, 9”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [7] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    There was some variation by diet group in median duration since last meal or drink at blood collection (up to 30 min) and in time between blood collection and processing (up to 19 h), although after adjustment for multiple testing this was not statistically significant.

    “There was some variation by diet group in median duration since last meal or drink at blood collection (up to 30 min) and in time between blood collection and processing (up to 19 h), although after adjustment for multiple testing this was not statistically significant (Supplementary Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The observed trend in protein intake may also partly reflect an increasing degree of underestimation of intake as more animal foods are omitted, because some plant foods eaten by vegetarians and vegans may not be in the FFQ and they may eat larger portions than standard portion sizes.

    “The observed trend in protein intake may also partly reflect an increasing degree of underestimation of intake as more animal foods are omitted; some plant foods eaten by vegetarians and vegans may not be in the FFQ, and vegetarians and vegans may eat larger portions of some plant foods than the standard portion sizes assigned.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Matching UK foods to the nearest food in the US nutrient database by total protein content yields valid estimates of amino acid intakes for the UK diet groups.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The study had data available on both plasma concentrations and dietary intakes of amino acids, as well as on a wide range of covariates, for example BMI.

    “Moreover, data were available on both plasma concentrations and dietary intakes of amino acids, as well as on a wide range of covariates, for example BMI, which is related to amino acid concentrations.32”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Self-reported height and weight showed good agreement with measured values in a sub-sample of the cohort (correlation coefficient r>0.9).

    “There was good agreement between self-reported and measured height and weight from a sub-sample of the cohort (correlation coefficient (r)>0.9).14”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The differences in plasma concentrations were less marked than and did not necessarily mirror those seen for amino acid intakes.

    “However, the differences in plasma concentrations were less marked than and did not necessarily mirror those seen for amino acid intakes.”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
      “These differences were less pronounced than, and did not mirror those observed for amino acid intakes (the majority of which were highest in meat-eaters followed by fish-eaters, then vegetarians and finally vegans).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    No samples had concentrations below the lower limit of quantification, whereas for five amino acids a few values (n≤2) were above the highest standard and were set equal to this value.

    “No samples had concentrations below the lower limit of quantification, whereas for five amino acids a few values (n⩽2) were above the highest standard and were set equal to this value (400 μmol/l for leucine, histidine, threonine and ornithine, and 800 μmol/l for glutamate).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Analyses of plasma amino acid concentrations and intakes were adjusted for age, BMI, smoking status, alcohol intake, time since last food or drink, time between blood collection and processing, and energy intake.

    “The analyses of concentrations and intakes were both adjusted for age (30–34; 35–39; 40–44; 45–49 years), body mass index (BMI; <22.5; 22.5–24.9; ⩾25 kg/m2; unknown), smoking status (never; former; current) and alcohol intake (<1; 1–7; 8–15; ⩾16 g/d).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The differences by diet group observed for lysine and tyrosine were supported by similar findings from previous studies, as were the null results for isoleucine, phenylalanine, asparagine, proline, serine and ornithine.

    “The differences by diet group we observed for lysine and tyrosine were supported by similar findings from previous studies, as were the null results for isoleucine, phenylalanine, asparagine, proline, serine and ornithine.7, 9”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [7] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Including physical activity in the statistical model did not materially change the findings for amino acid intakes.

    “Including physical activity in the statistical model did not materially change the findings (results not shown).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Plasma concentration of amino acids is a result of a complex interplay between dietary intake, tissue breakdown and de-novo synthesis and other factors such as gut microbial synthesis increasing the concentration and tissue uptake and excretion reducing the concentration.

    “The plasma concentration of amino acids is a result of a complex interplay between dietary intake, tissue breakdown and de-novo synthesis3 and other factors such as gut microbial synthesis increasing the concentration30 and tissue uptake and excretion reducing the concentration.3”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [30] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The median overall coefficient of variation for the amino acids was 11.8% (range 5.4-17.3).

    “The median (range) overall coefficient of variation for the amino acids was 11.8% (5.4–17.3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The number of unavailable plasma amino acid concentrations did not differ significantly by diet group for lysine, phenylalanine or proline.

    “The number of unavailable concentrations did not differ significantly by diet group for lysine, phenylalanine or proline”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All results were interpreted after allowance for multiple testing using the Bonferroni method.

    “Conventional two-sided P-values are shown, but all results have been interpreted after allowance for multiple testing using the Bonferroni method; the per-test significance level was 0.05 divided by the number of tests.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
29 of 29
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Other pre-analytical conditions, which the study did not have information about, are not related to diet group.

    “Other pre-analytical conditions, which we do not have information about, are most likely also not related to diet group.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Matching UK foods to the nearest food in the US nutrient database by total protein content yields valid estimates of amino acid intakes for the UK diet groups.

    “All UK foods were matched to the nearest food in the US nutrient database, paying specific attention to match on the total protein content so that scaling was not necessary.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The FFQ-based categorisation of participants into diet groups accurately reflects their habitual diet.

    “Categorisation of the four diet groups was based on the answers to the questions 'Do you eat any meat; fish; dairy products; and eggs?'”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The covariates adjusted for are sufficient to control confounding of the diet-group differences in amino acid concentrations and intakes.

    “The analyses of concentrations and intakes were both adjusted for age (30–34; 35–39; 40–44; 45–49 years), body mass index (BMI; <22.5; 22.5–24.9; ⩾25 kg/m2; unknown), smoking status (never; former; current) and alcohol intake (<1; 1–7; 8–15; ⩾16 g/d).”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Animal-based food sources are generally protein dense, especially meat and dairy products, and therefore comprise a major proportion of protein intake in the general population.

    “Animal-based food sources are generally protein dense, especially meat and dairy products, and therefore comprise a major proportion of protein intake in the general population [23,37,39].”

    From Nutritional Considerations for the Vegan Athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

  • Vegans have a higher risk than omnivores for deficiencies in several micronutrients predominantly found in animal-derived foods, such as vitamin B12, iron, calcium, and vitamin D.

    “Large cohort studies indicate that vegans have a higher risk (compared with omnivores) for deficiencies in several micronutrients predominantly found in animal-derived foods, such as vitamin B12, iron, calcium, and vitamin D”

    From Nutritional Considerations for the Vegan Athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Holland B, Welch AA, Unwin ID, Buss DH, Paul AA . . Southgate DAT. McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th edn. The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, 1991.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, J. A., Rinaldi, S., Scalbert, A., Ferrari, P., Achaintre, D., Gunter, M. J., Appleby, P. N., Key, T. J., & Travis, R. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, J A
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2015-09-23
Volume
70
Issue
3
Pages
306-312
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W2190313991
Cited by
349
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9
FWCI
17.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • World Health Organization
  • Cancer Research UK (19170, 16491, C8221/A19170, A16491, 570/A16491, A19170)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/M012190/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
plasma amino acids, meat-eaters, vegetarians, vegans, dietary protein quality, methionine, tryptophan, tyrosine, lysine, glycine, alanine, amino acid metabolism
MeSH terms
Diet, Vegan, Adult, Alanine, Amino Acids, Animals, Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Fishes, Glycine, Humans, Lysine, Male, Meat, Methionine, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Tryptophan, Tyrosine, Diet, Vegetarian, Seafood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review