Cited by 53Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Predicting Electrophoretic Mobility of Tryptic Peptides for High-Throughput CZE-MS Analysis

Open access
Krokhin, Oleg V., Anderson, Geoffrey, Spicer, Vic, Sun, Liangliang, Dovichi, Norman J.·2017·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

A multiparametric sequence-specific model for predicting peptide electrophoretic mobility has been developed using large-scale bottom-up proteomic CE-MS data (5% (∼0.8M) acetic acid as background electrolyte). Peptide charge ( Z ) and size (molecular mass, M ) are the two major factors determining electrophoretic mobility, in complete agreement with previous studies. The extended size of the data set (>4000 peptides) permits access to many sequence-specific factors that impact peptide mobility. The presence of acidic residues Asp and Glu near the peptide N-terminus is by far the most prominent among them. The induction effect of the side chain of N-terminal Asp reduces the basicity of the N-terminal amino group and, as hence, its charge, by ∼0.27 units, lowering mobility. The correlation of the model ( R 2 ∼ 0.995) indicates that the peptide separation process in CZE is relatively simple and can be predicted to a much higher precision than current RP-HPLC models. Similar to RP-HPLC prediction studies, we anticipate future developments that introduce peptide migration standards, collect larger data sets for modeling through the alignment of multiple CZE-MS acquisitions, and study of the behavior of peptides carrying post-translational modifications. The increased size of data sets will also permit investigation of the fine-scale effects of peptide secondary structure on peptide mobility. We observed that peptides with higher helical propensity tend to have higher than predicted electrophoretic mobility; the incorporation of these features into CZE migration models will require significantly larger data sets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04544

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Dovichi group reported a sequence-specific model to predict peptide electrophoretic mobility via CZE separations.

    “The Dovichi group reported a sequence-specific model to predict peptide electrophoretic mobility via CZE separations75.”
  • Acidic residues Asp and Glu next to the N-terminus were observed to most influence the deviation of experimental mobility values from classical model predictions.

    “Acidic residues (Asp and Glu) next to the N-terminus were observed to most influence the deviation of experimental mobility values from values predicted via classical models.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [26]Jalali-Heravi M Shen Y Hassanisadi M Khaledi MG Electrophoresis 2005 26 1874 1885 15825217

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krokhin, O. V., Anderson, G., Spicer, V., Sun, L., & Dovichi, N. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States
Corresponding author
Krokhin, Oleg V.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2017-01-19
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
2000-2008
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2569641810
Cited by
53
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2016-05963)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01GM096767)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
capillary zone electrophoresis, tryptic peptides, peptide charge, peptide size, shotgun proteomics, peptide secondary structure, helical propensity
MeSH terms
Aspartic Acid, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, HeLa Cells, Humans, Models, Chemical, Peptides, Mass Spectrometry, Trypsin, Glutamic Acid, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Chromatography, Reverse-Phase, High-Throughput Screening Assays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review