Cited by 360Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFluorine in Organic ChemistryToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Alternative and Legacy Perfluoroalkyl Substances: Differences between European and Chinese River/Estuary Systems

Heydebreck, Franziska, Tang, Jianhui, Xie, Zhiyong, Ebinghaus, Ralf·2015·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

The production and use of long-chain perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) must comply with national and international regulations. Driven by increasingly stringent regulations, their production has been outsourced to less regulated countries in Asia. In addition, the fluoropolymer industry started to use fluorinated alternatives, such as 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(1,1,2,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropoxy)propanoic acid (HFPO-DA). Between August 2013 and September 2014, we investigated the occurrence and distribution of HFPO-DA and legacy PFASs in surface waters of the following river/estuary systems: the Elbe and Rhine Rivers in Germany, the Rhine-Meuse delta in The Netherlands, and the Xiaoqing River in China. Distinct differences were revealed among the study areas; notably, the Chinese samples were highly polluted by an industrial point source discharging mainly perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). This particular point source resulted in concentrations more than 6000 times higher than an industrial point source observed in the Scheur River, where HFPO-DA was the dominant compound with a concentration of 73.1 ng/L. Moreover, HFPO-DA was detected in all samples along the coastline of the North Sea, indicating that the compound may be transported from the Rhine-Meuse delta into the German Bight via the water current. To the best of our knowledge, the fluorinated alternative, HFPO-DA, was detected for the first time in surface waters of Germany and China.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.5b01648

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heydebreck, F., Tang, J., Xie, Z., & Ebinghaus, R.
Affiliations
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Heydebreck, Franziska
  • Tang, Jianhui
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2015-07-07
Volume
49
Issue
14
Pages
8386-8395
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2409075100
Cited by
360
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 1
FWCI
12.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Knowledge Repository of Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, CAS (Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA11020402)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, HFPO-DA, perfluorooctanoic acid, surface water contamination, Rhine-Meuse delta, Xiaoqing River, Elbe River, Rhine River, German Bight
MeSH terms
Caprylates, China, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Germany, Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated, Netherlands, North Sea, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Rivers, Estuaries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review