Cited by 257Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFluorine in Organic Chemistry

Levels, Isomer Profiles, and Estimated Riverine Mass Discharges of Perfluoroalkyl Acids and Fluorinated Alternatives at the Mouths of Chinese Rivers

Open access
Wang, Thanh, Vestergren, Robin, Herzke, Dorte, Yu, Junchao, Cousins, Ian T.·2016·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

PFAAs varied considerably among the 19 rivers (mean 106; median 16.3, range 8.9-1240 ng/L), indicating the influence of specific point sources. Highly branched isomer profiles of perfluorooctanoic acid (18-25% br-PFOA) in rivers with elevated concentrations (96-352 ng/L) indicate that releases during production of PFOA by electrochemical fluorination and/or its use in fluoropolymer manufacture were the dominant sources to these rivers. The fluorinated alternatives 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate (detection frequency 21%, < 0.1-3.1 ng/L) and chlorinated polyfluoroalkyl ether sulfonate F-53B (51%, < 0.56-78.5 ng/L) were also found in some rivers. The total Chinese riverine mass discharges of PFOA (mean 80.9; range 16.8-168 t/y) (including monitoring data from this and other studies) were in good agreement with theoretical PFOA emission estimates (17.3-203 t/y) whereas riverine mass discharges of PFOS (mean 3.6; range 1.9-5.6 t/y) could only account for a minor fraction of theoretically estimated PFOS releases (70 t/y). This study provides empirical evidence that emissions from Chinese point sources likely dominate the global emissions of several legacy PFASs (notably PFOA) and fluorinated alternatives (e.g., F-53B).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.6b03752

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, T., Vestergren, R., Herzke, D., Yu, J., & Cousins, I. T.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • The FRAM Centre (NO)
Corresponding author
Wang, Thanh
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2016-10-12
Volume
50
Issue
21
Pages
11584-11592
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2527221479
Cited by
257
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 18 · 2015: 1
FWCI
16.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences OpenIR (Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
perfluoroalkyl acids, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate, F-53B, point source emissions, electrochemical fluorination, Chinese rivers
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Isomerism, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Rivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review