Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 424

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Well-Ordered Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as Cell Markers

Lin, Yu-Shen, Tsai, Chih-Pin, Huang, Hsing-Yi, Kuo, Chieh-Ti, Hung, Yann, Huang, Dong-Ming, Chen, Yao-Chang, Mou, Chung-Yuan·2005·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

Fluorescein labeled well-ordered mesoporous silica nanoparticles with sizes around 110 nm have been synthesized and characterized. These particles can enter cells efficiently. Cellular uptake and the potential of using these nanoparticles as cell markers have been demonstrated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cm051014c

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lin, Y.-S., Tsai, C.-P., Huang, H.-Y., Kuo, C.-T., Hung, Y., Huang, D.-M., Chen, Y.-C., & Mou, C.-Y.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2005-08-10
Volume
17
Issue
18
Pages
4570-4573
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2030178950
Cited by
424
References
0
FWCI
11.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.