Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Urban versus Remote Air Concentrations of Fluorotelomer Alcohols and Other Polyfluorinated Alkyl Substances in Germany

Jahnke, Annika, Ahrens, Lutz, Ebinghaus, Ralf, Temme, Christian·2007·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Neutral, volatile polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) were measured in environmental air samples at two different sites in Northern Germany in spring 2005. The sampling locations were chosen to cover a metropolitan and a rural site, the Hamburg city center, and Waldhof, a background monitoring site. An optimized and validated analytical protocol was used to analyze two sets of parallel high-volume air samples. For both sampling locations as well as for individual samples, field blanks were taken to monitor possible background contamination. Gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry using positive chemical ionization (GC/ PCI-MS) was used for quantitative analyses. This article describes the first air concentration data of volatile PFAS outside North America reported in the peer-reviewed literature. The wide distribution of fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs), fluorinated sulfonamides, and sulfonamidoethanols (FOSAs/FOSEs) in German environmental air is presented. Furthermore, two volatile PFAS, i.e., N-methyl fluorooctane sulfonamide (NMeFOSA) and 4:2 FTOH, were determined for the first time in environmental air. Minimum-maximum sigmaFTOH concentrations of 64-311 pg/m3 (remote) up to 150-546 pg/m3 (urban) and minimum-maximum sigmaFOSA + FOSE concentrations between 12 and 54 pg/m3 (remote) and 29 and 151 pg/m3 (urban) were determined. 8:2 FTOH and 6:2 FTOH were found to be the predominant POPs determined in Waldhof so far. Blank contamination was found to be negligible. A significant correlation was found with the ambient temperature for the partitioning of airborne FOSEs between the gaseous and particulate phase (R = 0.853), whereas FTOHs and FOSAs were almost exclusively found in the gaseous phase. Furthermore, highest airborne PFAS concentrations were determined at relatively high ambient temperatures. Correlation coefficients (R) for sigmaFTOH and sigmaFOSA + FOSE concentrations with temperature were 0.954 and 0.968, respectively. Finally, the PFAS concentrations determined in this study are set into context with levels of "classical" persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the same region and PFAS data available for North America.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es0619861

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Jahnke, A., Ahrens, L., Ebinghaus, R., & Temme, C.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2006-12-22
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
745-752
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W1989217101
Cited by
165
References
5
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.