The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Study on the Antioxidant and Biological Activities of Carvacrol, Thymol, and Eugenol Derivatives
Abstract
Four derivatives of thymol, carvacrol, and eugenol were synthesized: 4-(hydroxymethyl)-5-isopropyl-2-methylphenol, 4,4'-methylenebis(5-isopropyl-2-methyl)phenol, 4-allyl-6-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methoxyphenol, and 4-(hydroxymethyl)-2-isopropyl-5-methylphenol. The obtained derivatives showed remarkably better antioxidative properties according to 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl assay (50% inhibitory concentrations = 4-156 microg/mL) and Rancimat assay (protection factors = 1.55-5.84) when compared with parent compounds and values similar to or better than those of butylated hydroxytoluene and vitamin C. At concentrations of 10 mM carvacrol derivatives had no toxic effect on viability of Escherichia coli K-12 (determined by minimum inhibitory concentrations). Other phenol derivatives showed reduced cytotoxic effect on E. coli K-12 at concentrations of 2-5 mM on the basis of 50% lethal dose measurements. In comparison with the parent compounds, phenol derivatives showed reduced cytotoxic effect for Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells (determined by yeast colony reduction). On the other hand, the majority of synthesized compounds had dose-dependent antiproliferative effects on human uterine carcinoma cells (HeLa), which makes them potentially interesting for the adjuvant experimental cancer treatments. The 4,4'-methylenebis(5-isopropyl-2-methyl)phenol derivative of carvacrol showed lower inhibiting capacity also for the HeLa cells, which makes this particular derivative attractive as an efficient antioxidant with negligible cytotoxic effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use of a Free Radical Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Activity
Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M. E., & Berset, C. (1995) · LWT - Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0023-6438(95)80008-5 · Cited by 25,994
Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—A review
Burt, S. (2004) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.022 · Cited by 10,488
Screening of Plant Extracts for Antioxidant Activity: a Comparative Study on Three Testing Methods
Koleva, I. I., van Beek, T. A., Linssen, J. P. H., Groot, A. D., & Evstatieva, L. N. (2002) · Phytochemical Analysis · doi:10.1002/pca.611 · Cited by 1,782
Antioxidant activity of selected essential oil components in two lipid model systems
Ruberto, G., & Baratta, M. T. (2000) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0308-8146(99)00247-2 · Cited by 1,187
In-vitro antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of Sardinian Thymus essential oils
Cosentino, S., Tuberoso, C. I. G., Pisano, B., Satta, M., Mascia, V., Arzedi, E., & Palmas, F. (1999) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1472-765x.1999.00605.x · Cited by 1,055
Juven, B. J., Kanner, J., Schved, F., & Weisslowicz, H. (1994) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1994.tb01661.x · Cited by 833
Antibacterial activity of selected plant essential oils against Escherichia coli O157:H7
Burt, S. A., & Reinders, R. D. (2003) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1472-765x.2003.01285.x · Cited by 799
Laguerre, M., Lecomte, J., & Villeneuve, P. (2007) · Progress in Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2007.05.002 · Cited by 706
An industrial approach in the search of natural antioxidants from vegetable and fruit wastes
Peschel, W., Sánchez-Rabaneda, F., Diekmann, W., Plescher, A., Gartzía, I., Jiménez, D., Lamuela-Raventós, R., Buxaderas, S., & Codina, C. (2006) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.03.033 · Cited by 649
Solvent Effects on the Rates and Mechanisms of Reaction of Phenols with Free Radicals
Litwinienko, G., & Ingold, K. U. (2007) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar0682029 · Cited by 647
Cited by
Antioxidants and antioxidant methods: an updated overview
Gulcin, İ. (2020) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-020-02689-3 · Cited by 2,205
Antioxidants: a comprehensive review
Gulcin, İ. (2025) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-025-03997-2 · Cited by 386
Antioxidant activity of medicinal and aromatic plants. A review.
Miguel, M. G. (2010) · Flavour and Fragrance Journal · doi:10.1002/ffj.1961 · Cited by 323
Jafarzadeh, S., Jafari, S. M., Salehabadi, A., Nafchi, A. M., Uthaya Kumar, U. S., & Khalil, H. P. S. A. (2020) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.017 · Cited by 288
Anti-proliferative effects of carvacrol on a human metastatic breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB 231
Arunasree, K. M. (2010) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2009.12.008 · Cited by 279
Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of eugenol and carvacrol‐grafted chitosan nanoparticles
Chen, F., Shi, Z., Neoh, K. G., & Kang, E. T. (2009) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.22363 · Cited by 262
Loizzo, M. R., Menichini, F., Conforti, F., Tundis, R., Bonesi, M., Saab, A. M., Statti, G. A., Cindio, B. D., Houghton, P. J., Menichini, F., et al. (2009) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.03.095 · Cited by 196
Biological and Nonbiological Antioxidant Activity of Some Essential Oils
Pérez-Rosés, R., Risco, E., Vila, R., Peñalver, P., & Cañigueral, S. (2016) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00986 · Cited by 120
KULISIC-BILUSIC, T., BLAŽEVIĆ, I., DEJANOVIĆ, B., MILOŠ, M., & PIFAT, G. (2010) · Journal of Food Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1745-4514.2009.00330.x · Cited by 58
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mastelić, J., Jerković, I., Blažević, I., Poljak-Blaži, M., Borović, S., Ivančić-Baće, I., Smrečki, V., Žarković, N., Brčić-Kostic, K., Vikić-Topić, D., & Müller, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-05-13
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3989-3996
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2059747141
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
