Cited by 799Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityInsect Pest Control StrategiesAntimicrobial agents and applications

Antibacterial activity of selected plant essential oils against Escherichia coli O157:H7

Burt, S.A., Reinders, R.D.·2003·Letters in Applied Microbiology

Abstract

AIMS: To quantify the antibacterial properties of five essential oils (EO) on a non-toxigenic strain of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in the presence and absence of a stabilizer and an emulsifier and at three different temperatures. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five EOs known to exhibit antibacterial properties were screened by disc diffusion assay and the most active were selected for further study in microdilution colorimetric assays. Oregano (Origanum vulgare) and thyme (Thymus vulgaris; light and red varieties) EO had the strongest bacteriostatic and bactericidal properties, followed by bay (Pimenta racemosa) and clove bud (Eugenia caryophyllata synonym: Syzygium aromaticum) EO. Oregano oil was colicidal at 625 microl l(-1) at 10, 20 and 37 degrees C. The addition of 0.05% (w/v) agar as stabilizer reinforced the antibacterial properties, particularly at 10 degrees C, whereas 0.25% (w/v) lecithin reduced antibacterial activity. Scanning electron micrographs showed extensive morphological changes to treated cells. CONCLUSIONS: Oregano and thyme EO possess significant in vitro colicidal and colistatic properties, which are exhibited in a broad temperature range and substantially improved by the addition of agar as stabilizer. Bay and clove bud EO are less active. Lecithin diminished antibacterial properties. The bactericidal concentration of oregano EO irreversibly damaged E. coli O157:H7 cells within 1 min. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Oregano and light thyme EO, particularly when enhanced by agar stabilizer, may be effective in reducing the number or preventing the growth of E. coli O157:H7 in foods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2003.01285.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Essential oils contain a wide variety of secondary metabolites capable of inhibiting or slowing the growth of bacteria, yeasts and moulds.

    “EOs contain a wide series of secondary metabolites that can inhibit or slow the growth of bacteria, yeasts and moulds [3,4,5].”

    From Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria (2013) · cites this paper as [4]

  • Sustained loss of ions or metabolites due to exposure to an essential oil can compromise microbial metabolism and lead to cell death.

    “Furthermore, the sustained loss of ions or metabolites due to exposure to an EO can compromise the microbial metabolism and lead to cell death [4,57].”

    From Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria (2013) · cites this paper as [4]

  • Essential oils are less able to affect the cell growth of Gram-negative bacteria than Gram-positive bacteria.

    “thus, EOs are less able to affect the cell growth of the Gram-negative bacteria [4].”

    From Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria (2013) · cites this paper as [4]

  • Treating E. coli O157:H7 with oregano essential oil, which is rich in thymol and carvacrol, resulted in the collapse of cells after the loss of their contents.

    “Observations made by electron microscopy showed that treating E. coli O157:H7 with oregano EO, which is rich in thymol and carvacrol, resulted in the collapse of cells after the loss of their contents [4,26,115].”

    From Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria (2013) · cites this paper as [4]

  • Gram-negative bacteria are generally considered to be more resistant to essential oils.

    “However, Gram-negative bacteria are generally considered to be more resistant to EOs.”

    From Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria (2013) · cites this paper as [4]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burt, S. A., & Reinders, R. D.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Burt, S.A.
Venue
Letters in Applied Microbiology
Published
2003-03
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
162-167
ISSN
  • 0266-8254 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2673
OpenAlex
W2025879035
Cited by
799
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 42
FWCI
26.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Letters in Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
plant essential oils, Escherichia coli O157:H7, antibacterial activity, oregano essential oil, thyme essential oil, clove bud oil, bactericidal activity, bacteriostatic activity, lecithin emulsifier, temperature effects, cell morphology, food safety
MeSH terms
Agar, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Colorimetry, Culture Media, Food Microbiology, Oils, Volatile, Phosphatidylcholines, Plant Oils, Temperature, Spices, Escherichia coli O157

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review