Cited by 99Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Controlling the Neuronal Differentiation of Stem Cells by the Intracellular Delivery of Retinoic Acid-Loaded Nanoparticles

Maia, João, Santos, Tiago, Aday, Sezin, Agasse, Fabienne, Cortes, Luísa, Malva, João O., Bernardino, Liliana, Ferreira, Lino·2011·ACS Nano

Abstract

The manipulation of endogenous stem cell populations from the subventricular zone (SVZ), a neurogenic niche, creates an opportunity to induce neurogenesis and influence brain regenerative capacities in the adult brain. Herein, we demonstrate the ability of polyelectrolyte nanoparticles to induce neurogenesis exclusively after being internalized by SVZ stem cells. The nanoparticles are not cytotoxic for concentrations equal or below 10 μg/mL. The internalization process is rapid, and nanoparticles escape endosomal fate in a few hours. Retinoic acid-loaded nanoparticles increase the number of neuronal nuclear protein (NeuN)-positive neurons and functional neurons responding to depolarization with KCl and expressing NMDA receptor subunit type 1 (NR1). These nanoparticles offer an opportunity for in vivo delivery of proneurogenic factors and neurodegenerative disease treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nn101724r

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because of the hydrophobicity of RA, the occurrence of a burst release in most formulations is negligible.

    “Because of the hydrophobicity of RA, the occurrence of a burst release in most formulations is negligible44,47,51,63.”
  • RA delivery systems have been prepared by complexation of RA with proteins or cationic polymers, by physical encapsulation in polymeric or inorganic nanoparticles, microparticles, micelles, liposomes, or films, by covalent attachment of RA to a carrier, or by immobilization of RA on surfaces of nanoparticles.

    “Several strategies have been used to prepare RA delivery systems: namely, by complexation of RA with proteins (e.g., transthyretin)42 or cationic polymers (e.g., poly(ethyleneimine) (PEI))43,44, by physical encapsulation in polymeric25,44 or inorganic45 nanoparticles, microparticles46, micelles47,48, liposomes49, or films43, by covalent attachment of RA to a carrier50, or by immobilization of RA”
  • In physical interaction, RA is complexed with positively charged polymers such as chitosan or PEI; the carboxylic acid of RA interacts electrostatically with the amine group located in the polymer, forming a complex that can be stabilized by addition of a polyanion and divalent ions.

    “Regarding physical interaction, RA is complexed with positively charged polymers such as chitosan, or PEI43,51. The carboxylic acid of RA interacts electrostatically with the amine group located in the polymer, forming a complex that can be stabilized by addition of a polyanion and divalent ions43,44.”
  • The cellular uptake of some RA-containing nanoparticles has been demonstrated to take <12 h by clathrin-mediated endocytosis and macropinocytosis.

    “The cellular uptake of some RA-containing nanoparticles has been demonstrated to take <12 h44 by clathrin-mediated endocytosis and macropinocytosis25.”
  • In vitro tests showed that ATRA-containing liposomes or ATRA-containing polymeric nanoparticles were 100-1000 times more active than soluble ATRA in cultured tumor cells or neural stem cells.

    “In vitro tests showed that ATRA-containing liposomes69 or ATRA-containing polymeric nanoparticles25,44 were 100–1000 times more active than soluble ATRA in cultured tumor cells25,69 or neural stem cells (NSC)44.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maia, J., Santos, T., Aday, S., Agasse, F., Cortes, L., Malva, J. O., Bernardino, L., & Ferreira, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • Neuroprotection and Neurogenesis in Brain Repair Group
  • Biomaterials and Stem Cell-Based Therapeutics Group
  • Microscopy and Flow Cytometry Unit
Corresponding author
  • Bernardino, Liliana
  • Ferreira, Lino
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2010-12-20
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
97-106
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W2084116832
Cited by
99
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Nano (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
retinoic acid, nanoparticles, neuronal differentiation, neurogenesis, polyelectrolyte nanoparticles, intracellular delivery, endosomal escape, NMDA receptor NR1, adult neurogenesis, neurodegenerative disease treatment, brain regeneration
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Transport, Cell Differentiation, Cell Survival, Drug Carriers, Neurons, Stem Cells, Tretinoin, Intracellular Space, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review