Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 425

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cellular Uptake and Fate of PEGylated Gold Nanoparticles Is Dependent on Both Cell-Penetration Peptides and Particle Size

Oh, Eunkeu, Delehanty, James B., Sapsford, Kim E., Susumu, Kimihiro, Goswami, Ramasis, Blanco-Canosa, Juan B., Dawson, Philip E., Granek, Jessica, Shoff, Megan, Zhang, Qin, Goering, Peter L., Huston, Alan, Medintz, Igor L.·2011·ACS Nano

Abstract

Numerous studies have examined how the cellular delivery of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) is influenced by different physical and chemical characteristics; however, the complex relationship between AuNP size, uptake efficiency and intracellular localization remains only partially understood. Here we examine the cellular uptake of a series of AuNPs ranging in diameter from 2.4 to 89 nm that are synthesized and made soluble with poly(ethylene glycol)-functionalized dithiolane ligands terminating in either carboxyl or methoxy groups and covalently conjugated to cell penetrating peptides. Following synthesis, extensive physical characterization of the AuNPs was performed with UV-vis absorption, gel electrophoresis, zeta potential, dynamic light scattering, and high resolution transmission electron microscopy. Uptake efficiency and intracellular localization of the AuNP-peptide conjugates in a model COS-1 cell line were probed with a combination of silver staining, fluorescent counterstaining, and dual mode fluorescence coupled to nonfluorescent scattering. Our findings show that AuNP cellular uptake is directly dependent on the surface display of the cell-penetrating peptide and that the ultimate intracellular destination is further determined by AuNP diameter. The smallest 2.4 nm AuNPs were found to localize in the nucleus, while intermediate 5.5 and 8.2 nm particles were partially delivered into the cytoplasm, showing a primarily perinuclear fate along with a portion of the nanoparticles appearing to remain at the membrane. The 16 nm and larger AuNPs did not enter the cells and were located at the cellular periphery. A preliminary assessment of cytotoxicity demonstrated minimal effects on cellular viability following peptide-mediated uptake.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nn201624c

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Cited by

See all 425

Metadata

Authors
Oh, E., Delehanty, J. B., Sapsford, K. E., Susumu, K., Goswami, R., Blanco-Canosa, J. B., Dawson, P. E., Granek, J., Shoff, M., Zhang, Q., Goering, P. L., Huston, A., & Medintz, I. L.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2011-07-20
Volume
5
Issue
8
Pages
6434-6448
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W1999592249
Cited by
425
References
66
FWCI
13.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.