Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 530

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analytical Strategies in Metabonomics

Lenz, Eva Maria, Wilson, Ian D.·2007·Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract

To perform metabonomics investigations, it is necessary to generate comprehensive metabolite profiles for complex samples such as biofluids and tissue/tissue extracts. Analytical technologies that can be used to achieve this aim are constantly evolving, and new developments are changing the way in which such profiles' metabolite profiles can be generated. Here, the utility of various analytical techniques for global metabolite profiling, such as, e.g., 1 H NMR, MS, HPLC-MS, and GC-MS, are explored and compared. Keywords: global metabolite profiling • metabotyping • metabonomics • metabolomics • spectroscopic analysis • separations • hyphenation

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/pr0605217

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lenz, E. M., & Wilson, I. D.
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2006-12-13
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
443-458
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W1978461542
Cited by
530
References
1
FWCI
12.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.