Cited by 216Nutritional Studies and DietCancer Risks and FactorsGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent diet and breast cancer risk: the California Teachers Study (USA)

Open access
Horn-Ross, Pamela L., Hoggatt, K.J., West, Dee W., Krone, Melissa R., Stewart, Susan L., Anton-Culver, Hoda, Bernstein, Leslie, Deapen, Dennis, Peel, David, Pinder, Richard, Reynolds, Peggy, Ross, Ronald K., Wright, William, Ziogas, Al·2002·Cancer Causes & Control

Abstract

Objective The impact, if any, on breast cancer risk of modifying adult dietary intake is an area of much interest. We take the opportunity to address the relationship between recent adult diet and breast cancer risk during the first two years of follow-up of the large California Teachers Study cohort. Methods Of the 111.526 at-risk cohort members who resided in California and completed a baseline dietary assessment, 711 were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer after joining the cohort and before January 1998. Average daily nutrient intake was computed based on a food-frequency questionnaire assessing usual dietary intake and portion size during the year prior to joining the cohort. Incident breast cancers were identified through the California Cancer Registry and follow-up for death and confirmation of continued California residence utilized a variety of data sources. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate relative hazards. Results The following components of recent dietary intake were not associated with breast cancer risk: energy, fat, fiber, antioxidant vitamins, and phytoestrogens. Only recent average alcohol consumption of 20 or more grams per day (approximately two or more glasses of wine) was associated with increased risk (RR= 1.5, 95% CI: 1.2-2.0 compared to non-drinkers; P(trend) = 0.01 across quintiles). Conclusion With the exception of alcohol consumption, this study provides no evidence that recent macro- or micronutrient composition of adult diet is likely to have a direct effect on breast cancer risk. Some reduction of alcohol consumption among those consuming more than one drink per day may be beneficial.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1015786030864

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of 11 prospective cohort studies reporting on risk of primary breast cancer, one (9%) showed soy isoflavone intake was associated with overall reduced risk, while the remaining studies showed no associations.

    “Of 11 studies reporting on risk of primary breast cancer, one (9%) showed that soy isoflavone intake was associated with overall reduced risk of breast cancer [116], while the remaining studies showed no associations [99,104,105,107-109,111,113-115,117].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. The Women's Health Initiative Study Group (1998) Design of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. Control Clin Trials 19: 61-109. 414 P.L. Horn-Ross et al. · DOI
  2. Boyd NF, Greenberg C, Lockwood G, et al. (1997) Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: results from a randomized trial. Canadian Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 89: 488-496. · DOI
  3. Reynolds R, Elkin SP, Layefsky ME, Lee GM (1999) Cancer in California school employees, 1988-1992. Am J Industrial Med 36: 271-278. · DOI
  4. Block G, Hartman AM, Dresser CM, Carroll MD, Gannon J, Gardner L (1986) A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am J Epidemiol 124: 453-469. · DOI
  5. Block G, Subar AF (1992) Estimates of nutrient intake from a food frequency questionnaire: the 1987 National Health Interview Survey. J Am Diet Assoc 92: 969-977. · DOI
  6. Block G, Thompson FE, Hartman AM, Larkin FA, Guire KE (1992) Comparison of two dietary questionnaires validated against multiple dietary records collected during a 1-year period. J Am Diet Assoc 92: 686-693. · DOI
  7. Pennington JAT, Schoen SA, Salmon GD, Young B, Johnson RD, Marts RW (1995) Composition of core foods of the U.S. food supply, 1982-1991. J Food Composition Anal 8: 171-217. · DOI
  8. Cao G, Sofic E, Prior RL (1996) Antioxidant capacity of tea and common vegetables. J Agric Food Chem 44: 3428-3431.
  9. Wang H, Cao G, Prior RL (1996) Total antioxidant capacity of fruits. J Agric Food Chem 44: 701-705. · DOI
  10. Horn-Ross PL, Barnes S, Lee M, et al. (2000) Assessing phytoestrogen exposure in epidemiologic studies: development of a database (United States). Cancer Causes Control 11: 289-298. · DOI
  11. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H (1982) Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications.
  12. Breslow NE, Day NE (1987) Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Vol. II: The Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.
  13. Block G, Sinha R, Gridley G (1994) Collection of dietarysupplement data and implications for analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 59: 232S-239S. · DOI
  14. Smith-Warner SA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, et al. (1998) Alcohol and breast cancer in women: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. J Am Med Assoc 279: 535-540. · DOI
  15. Howe G, Rohan T, Decarli A, et al. (1991) The association between alcohol and breast cancer risk: evidence from the combined analysis of six dietary case-control studies. Int J Cancer 47: 707-710. · DOI
  16. Longnecker MP (1994) Alcoholic beverage consumption in relation to risk of breast cancer: meta-analysis and review. Cancer Causes Control 5: 73-82. · DOI
  17. Ellison RC, Zhang Y, McLennan CE, Rothman KJ (2001) Exploring the relation of alcohol consumption to risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 154: 740-747. · DOI
  18. World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Rearch (1997) Food, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: American Institute for Cancer Research.
  19. Hunter DJ, Spiegelman D, Adami HO, et al. (1996) Cohort studies of fat intake and the risk of breast cancer-a pooled analysis. N Engl J Med 334: 356-361. · DOI
  20. Lee MM, Lin SS (2000) Dietary fat and breast cancer. Annu Rev Nutr 20: 221-248. · DOI
  21. Adlercreutz H (1990) Western diet and Western diseases: some hormonal and biochemical mechanisms and associations. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 201: 3-23. · DOI
  22. Kaaks R (1996) Nutrition, hormones, and breast cancer: is insulin the missing link? Cancer Causes Control 7: 605-625. · DOI
  23. Wu F, Ames R, Evans MC, France JT, Reid IR (2001) Determinants of sex hormone-binding globulin in normal postmenopausal women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf ) 54: 81-87. · DOI
  24. Adlercreutz H, Fotsis T, Hockerstedt K, et al. (1989) Diet and urinary estrogen profile in premenopausal omnivorous and vegetarian women and in premenopausal women with breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem 34: 527-530. · DOI
  25. Howe GR, Hirohata T, Hislop TG, et al. (1990) Dietary factors and risk of breast cancer: combined analysis of 12 case-control studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 82: 561-569. · DOI
  26. Messina MJ, Persky V, Setchell KDR, Barnes S (1994) Soy intake and cancer risk: a review of the in vitro and in vivo data. Nutr Cancer 21: 113-131. · DOI
  27. Rose DP (1992) Dietary fiber, phytoestrogens, and breast cancer. Nutrition 8: 47-51.
  28. Messina M, Barnes S (1991) The role of soy products in reducing risk of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 83: 541-546. · DOI
  29. Adlercreutz H, Mousavi Y, Clark J (1992) Dietary phytoestrogens and cancer: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 41: 331-337. · DOI
  30. Petrakis NL, Barnes S, King EB, et al. (1996) Stimulatory influence of soy protein isolate on breast secretion in pre-and postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 5: 785-94.
  31. Lee HP, Gourley L, Duffy SW, Esteve J, Lee J, Day NE (1992) Risk factors for breast cancer by age and menopausal status: a case-control study in Singapore. Cancer Causes Control 3: 313-322. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Wu AH, Ziegler RG, Horn-Ross PL, et al. (1996) Tofu and risk of breast cancer in Asian-Americans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 5: 901-906.
  33. Hirose K, Tajima K, Hamajima N, et al. (1995) A large-scale, hospital-based case-control study of risk factors of breast cancer according to menopausal status. Jpn J Cancer Res 86: 146-154. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Horn-Ross PL, John EM, Lee M, et al. (2001) Phytoestrogen consumption and breast cancer risk in a multiethnic population: the Bay Area Breast Cancer Study. Am J Epidemiol 154: 434-441. · DOI
  35. Patterson RE, Kristal AR, Tinker LF, et al. (1999) Measurement characteristics of the Women's Health Initiative food frequency questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol 9: 178-187. · DOI
  36. Willett W, Lenart E (1998) Reproducibility and validity of foodfrequency questionnaires. In: Willett W, ed. Nutritional Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 101-147. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Horn-Ross, P. L., Hoggatt, K. J., West, D. W., Krone, M. R., Stewart, S. L., Anton-Culver, H., Bernstein, L., Deapen, D., Peel, D., Pinder, R., Reynolds, P., Ross, R. K., Wright, W., & Ziogas, A.
Affiliations
  • Cancer Prevention Institute of California (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • California Health and Human Services Agency (US)
Venue
Cancer Causes & Control
Published
2002-06
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
407-415
ISSN
  • 0957-5243 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7225
OpenAlex
W1512059116
Cited by
216
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 17
FWCI
13.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Causes & Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA077398, CA 77398)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
breast cancer risk, alcohol consumption, dietary fat, dietary fiber, antioxidant vitamins, phytoestrogens, energy intake, California Teachers Study, women's diet
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Breast Neoplasms, California, Diet, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Registries, Cohort Studies, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review