CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 305Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorStress Responses and CortisolSchizophrenia research and treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of Postweaning Social Isolation in the Rat on Brain Development, Conditioned Behavior, and Neurotransmission

Lapiz, M. D. S., Fulford, A., Muchimapura, S., Mason, R., Parker, T., Marsden, C. A.·2003·Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology
DOI 10.1023/a:1021171129766
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is substantial evidence that early life events influence brain development and subsequent adult behavior and play an important role in the causation of certain psychiatric disorders including schizophrenia and depression. The underlying mechanism of the effects of these early environmental factors is still not understood. It is a challenge to attempt to model early environmental factors in animals to gain understanding of the basic mechanisms that underlie the long-term effects. This paper reviews the effects of rearing rats from weaning in social isolation and reports some recent results indicating hippocampal dysfunction. Isolation rearing in rats from weaning produces a range of persistent behavioral changes in the young adult, including hyperactivity in response to novelty and amphetamine and altered responses to conditioning. These are associated with alterations in the central aminergic neurotransmitter functions in the mesolimbic areas and other brain regions. Isolation-reared rats have enhanced presynaptic dopamine (DA) and 5-HT function in the nucleus accumbens (NAC) associated with decreased presynaptic 5-HT function in the frontal cortex and hippocampus. Isolation-reared rats have reduced presynaptic noradrenergic function in the hippocampus, but have enhanced presynaptic DA function in the amygdala. These neurochemical imbalances may contribute to the exaggerated response of the isolated rat to a novel stimulus or to stimuli predictive of danger, and isolation-induced behavioral changes. These changes have neuroanatomical correlates, changes which seem to parallel to a certain degree those seen in human schizophrenia. A greater understanding of the processes that underlie these changes should improve our knowledge of how environmental events may alter brain development and function, and play a role in the development of neuropsychiatric disorders.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1021171129766

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neurodevelopmental models of schizophrenia in animals typically involve exposure of the neonate during gestation or the perinatal period to adverse environmental insults such as maternal stress, hypoxia, malnutrition, or post-weaning social isolation that alter brain development and cause behavioral deficits into adulthood.

    “Neurodevelopmental models of schizophrenia in animals typically involve exposure of the neonate, either during gestation or the perinatal period, to adverse environmental insults such as maternal stress, hypoxia, malnutrition, or post-weaning social isolation that alter the brain development and cause behavioral deficits into adulthood [100–102].”

    From Prenatal nicotine exposure during pregnancy results in adverse neurodevelopmental alterations and neurobehavioral deficits (2023) · cites this paper as [101]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 99

  1. C. Beaulieu and M. Colonnier, “Richness of environment affects the number of contacts formed by buotons containing flat vesicles but does not alter the number of these boutons per neuron,” J. Comp. Neurol., No. 274, 347–356 (1988). · DOI
  2. M. J. Bickerdicke, I. K. Wright, and C. A. Marsden, “Social isolation attenuates rat forebrain 5-HT release induced by KCl stimulation and exposure to a novel environment,” Behav. Pharmacol., No. 4, 231–236 (1993).
  3. M. E. Bitterman, “The evolution of intelligence,” Scientific American, No. 212, 92–100 (1965). · DOI
  4. S. L. Bowling, J. K. Rowlett, and M. T. Bardo, “The effect of environmental enrichment on amphetamine-stimulated locomotor activity, dopamine synthesis and dopamine release,” Neuropharmacology, No. 32, 885–893. (1993). · DOI
  5. D. L. Braff and M. A. Geyer, “Sensorimotor gating and schizophrenia: human and animal model studies,” Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, No. 47, 181–188 (1990). · DOI
  6. D. L. Braff, C. Grillon, and M. A. Geyer, “Gating and habituation of the startle reflex in schizophrenic patients,” Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, No. 49, 206–215 (1992). · DOI
  7. D. L. Braff, C. Stone, E. Callaway, M. A. Geyer, I. D. Glick, and L. Bali, “Prestimulus effects of human startle reflex in normals and schizophrenics,” Psychophysiol., No. 15, 339–343 (1978). · DOI
  8. A. K. Cadogan, D. A. Kendall, and C. A. Marsden, “Serotonin 5-HT(1A) receptor activation increases cyclic AMP formation in the rat hippocampus in vivo,” J. Neurochem., No. 62, 1816–1821 (1994). · DOI
  9. J. T. Coyle and D. Henry, “Catecholamines in foetal and newborn rat brain,” J. Neurochem., No. 21, 61–67. 1973. · DOI
  10. M. C. Diamond, B. Linder, R. Johnson, E. L. Bennett, and M. R. Rosenzweig, “Differences in occipital cortical synapses from environmentally enriched, impoverished and standard colony rats,” J Neurosci. Res., No. 1, 109–119 (1975). · DOI
  11. L. P. Dwoskin, G. A. Gerhardt, C. J. Drebing, C. C. Wilcox, and N. R. Zahniser, “Uptake and release of dopamine from rat striatal slices: Comparison of PCP, amphetamine and nomifensine,” in: P. M. Beart, G. N. Woodruff, and D. M. Jackson (eds.), Pharmacology and Functional Regulation of Dopamine Neurons (1988). · DOI
  12. S. L. Eastwood and P. J. Harrison, “Detection and quantification of hippocampal synaptophysin messenger RNA in schizophrenia using autoclaves, formalin-fixed, paraffin wax-embedded sections,” Neuroscience, No. 93, 99–106 (1999). · DOI
  13. S. L. Eastwood, P. W. J. Burnet, and P. J. Harrison, “Altered synaptophysin expression as a marker of synaptic pathology in schizophrenia,” Neuroscience, No. 66, 309–319 (1995). · DOI
  14. D. Einon and B. J. Sahakian, “Environmentally induced differences in susceptibility of rats to CNS stimulants and CNS depressants: evidence against a unitary explanation,” Psychopharmacology, No. 61, 299–307 (1979). · DOI
  15. D. F. Einon, “Spatial memory and response strategies in rats: age, sex and rearing differences in performance,” Quart. J. Exper. Psychol., No. 32, 473–489 (1980). · DOI
  16. D. F. Einon, A. P. Humphreys, S. M. Chivers, S. Field, and V. Naylor, “Isolation has permanent effects upon the behavior of the rat, but not the mouse, gerbil or guinea pig,” Dev. Psychobiol., No. 14, 343–355 (1980). · DOI
  17. D. F. Einon and M. J. Morgan, “A critical period for social isolation in the rat,” Dev. Psychobiol., No. 10, 123–132 (1977). · DOI · Paper page
  18. B. F. M. Fiala, F. M. Snow, and W. T. Greenough, “'Impoverished' rats weigh more than 'enriched' rats because they eat more,” Dev. Psychobiol., No. 10, 537–541 (1977). · DOI
  19. M. K. Floeter and W. T. Greenough, “Cerebellar plasticity: modification of Purkinje cell structure by differential rearing in monkeys,” Science, No. 206, 227–229 (1979). · DOI
  20. K. C. F. Fone, K. Shalders, Z. D. Fox, R. Arthur, and C. A. Marsden, “Increased 5-HT2C receptor responsiveness occurs on rearing rats in social isolation,” Psychopharmacology, No. 123, 346–352 (1996). · DOI
  21. A. J. Fulford, S. Butler, D. J. Heal, D. A. Kendall, and C. A. Marsden, “Evidence of altered α2-adrenoceptor function following isolation-rearing in the rat,” Psychopharmacology, No. 116, 183–190 (1994). · DOI
  22. A. J. Fulford and C. A. Marsden, “Conditioned release of 5-hydroxytryptamine in vivo in the nucleus accumbens following isolation-rearing in the rat,” Neuroscience, No. 83, 481–487 (1997). · DOI
  23. A. J. Fulford and C. A. Marsden, “Effect of isolation-rearing on conditioned dopamine release in vivo in the nucleus accumbens of the rat,” J. Neurochem., No. 70, 384–390 (1998). · DOI
  24. A. J. Fulford and C. A. Marsden, “Effect of isolation-rearing on noradrenaline release in rat hypothalamus and hippocampus in vitro,” Brain Res., No. 748, 93–99 (1997). · DOI
  25. A. J. Fulford and C. A. Marsden, “Social isolation in the rat enhances α2-autoreceptor function in the hippocampus in vivo,” Neuroscience, No. 77, 57–64 (1997). · DOI
  26. C. Gentsch, M. Lichtsteiner, and H. Feer, “Locomotor activity, defecation score and corticosterone levels during open-field exposure: a comparison among individually and group-housed rats and genetically selected rat lines,” Physiol. Behav., No. 27, 183–186 (1981). · DOI
  27. C. Gentsch, M. Lichtsteiner, K. Kraeuchi, and H. Feer, “Different reaction patterns in individually and socially reared rats during exposure to novel environments,” Behav. Brain Res., No. 4, 45–54 (1982). · DOI
  28. M. A. Geyer, N. R. Swerdlow, R. S. Mansbach, and D. L. Braff, “Startle response models of sensorimotor gating and habituation deficits in schizophrenia,” Brain Res. Byull., No. 25, 485–498 (1990). · DOI
  29. M. A. Geyer, L. S. Wilkinson, T. Humby, and T. W. Robbins, “Isolation rearing of rats produces a deficit in prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle similar to that in schizophrenia,” Biol. Psychiatry, No. 34, 361–372 (1993). · DOI
  30. A. Globus, M. R. Rosenzweig, E. L. Bennett, and M. Diamond, “Effects of differential experience on dendritic spine counts in rat cerebral cortex,” J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., No. 82, 175–181 (1973). · DOI · Paper page
  31. C. Grillon, R. Ameli, D. S. Charney, J. Krystal, and D. L. Braff, “Startle gating deficits occur across prepulse intensities in schizophrenic patients,” Biol. Psychiatry, No. 32, 939–943 (1992). · DOI
  32. F. S. Hall, T. Humby, L. S. Wilkinson, and T. W. Robbins, “The effects of isolation-rearing of rats on behavioral responses to food and environmental novelty,” Physiol. Behav., No. 62, 281–290 (1997). · DOI
  33. C. J. Harmer and G. D. Phillips, “Isolation rearing enhances acquisition in a conditioned inhibition paradigm,” Physiol Behav., No. 65, 525–533 (1998). · DOI
  34. C. J. Harmer and G. D. Phillips, “Isolation rearing enhances the rate of acquisition of a discriminative approach task but does not affect the efficacy of conditioned reward,” Physiol. Behav., No. 63, 177–184 (1998). · DOI
  35. A. Hatch, G. S. Wiberg, T. Balazs, and H. C. Grice, “Long-term isolation stress in rats,” Science, No. 208, 507 (1963). · DOI
  36. D. O. Hebb, “The effects of early experience on problem solving at maturity,” Am. Psychol., No. 2, 306–307 (1947).
  37. P. K. Hitchcott, C. M. T. Bonardi, and G. D. Phillips, “Enhanced stimulus-reward learning by intra-amygdala administration of D3 dopamine receptor agonist,” Psychopharmacology (Berlin), No. 133, 240–248 (1997). · DOI
  38. P. K. Hitchott, C. J. Harmer, and G. D. Phillips, “Enhanced acquisition of discriminative approach following intra-amygdala amphetamine,” Psychopharmacology (Berlin), No. 132, 237–246 (1997). · DOI
  39. R. R. Holson, “Feeding neophobia: A possible explanation for the differential maze performance of rats reared in enriched or isolated environments,” Physiol. Behav., No. 38, 191–201 (1986). · DOI
  40. R. R. Holson, A. C. Scallet, S. F. Ali, and B. B. Turner, “'Isolation stress' revisited: isolation rearing effects depend on animal care methods,” Physiol. Behav., No. 49, 1107–1118 (1991). · DOI · Paper page
  41. K. Hori, J. Tanaka, and M. Nomura, “Effects of discrimination learning on the rat amygdala release: a microdialysis study,” Brain Res., No. 621, 296–300 (1993). · DOI
  42. M. Ichikawa, M. Matsuoka, and Y. Mori, “Effect of differential rearing on synapses and soma size in rat amygdaloid nucleus,” Synapse, No. 13, 50–56 (1993). · DOI
  43. G. H. Jones, T. D. Hernandez, D. A. Kendall, C. A. Marsden, and T. W. Robbins, “Dopaminergic and serotonergic function following isolation rearing in rats. a study of behavioral responses and postmortem and in vivo neurochemistry,” Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., No. 43, 17–35 (1992). · DOI · Paper page
  44. G. H. Jones, C. A. Marsden, and T. W. Robbins, “Behavioral rigidity and rule-learning deficits following isolation-reaing in the rat: neurochemical correlates,” Behav. Brain Res., No. 43, 35–50 (1991). · DOI
  45. G. H. Jones, T. W. Robbins, and C. A. Marsden, “Isolation-rearing retards the acquisition of schedule-induced polydipsia in rats,” Physiol. Behav., No. 45, 71–77 (1989). · DOI
  46. J. N. Joyce, “The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia: limbic interaction with serotonin and norepinephrine,” Psychopharmacology, No. 112, S16–S34 (1993). · DOI
  47. J. M. Juraska, C. Henderson, and J. Muller, “Differential rearing experience, gender and radial maze performance,” Dev. Psychobiol., No. 17, 209–215 (1984). · DOI
  48. M. S. Kaplan and D. H. Bell, “Neuronal proliferation in the 9-month-old rodent - radioautographic study of granule cells in the hippocampus,” Exp. Brain Res., No. 52, 1–5 (1983). · DOI
  49. M. S. Kaplan and D. H. Bell, “Mitotic neuroblasts in the 9-day-old and 11-month-old rodent hippocampus,” J. Neurosci., No. 4, 1429–1441 (1984). · DOI
  50. M. S. Kaplan and J. W. Hinds, “Neurogenesis in the adult rat: electron microscopic analysis of the light radioautographs,” Science, No. 197, 1092–1094 (1977). · DOI
  51. N. Karki, R. Kuntzman, and B. B. Brodie, “Norepinephrine and serotonin brain levels at various stages of ontogenic development,” Fed. Proc., No. 19, 282 (1960).
  52. K. Konrad and R. Melzack, “Novelty-enhancement effects associated with early sensorisocial isolation,” Psychol. Byull., No. 82, 986–995 (1975). · DOI
  53. G. W. Kraemer, M. H. Ebert, C. R. Lake, and W. T. McKinney, “Hypersensitivity to d-amphetamine several years after early social deprivation in rhesus monkeys,” Psychopharmacology, No. 82, 266–271 (1984). · DOI
  54. G. W. Kraemer and W. T. McKinney, “Social separation increases alcohol consumption in rhesus monkeys,” Psychopharmacology, No. 86, 182–189 (1985). · DOI
  55. D. Krech, M. R. Rosenzweig, and E. L. Bennett, “Relations between brain chemistry and problem-solving among rats raised in enriched and impoverished environments,” J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., No. 55, 801–807 (1962). · DOI
  56. L. P. Lanier and R. L. Issacson, “Early developmental changes in the locomotor response to amphetamine and their relation to hippocampal function,” Brain Res., No. 126, 567–575 (1977). · DOI
  57. M. D. S. Lapiz, Y. Mateo, T. L. Parker, and C. A. Marsden, “Central noradrenergic depletion enhanced hole-poking behavior in isolated rats,” Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., No. 25(2), 1876 (1999).
  58. M. D. S. Lapiz, Y. Mateo, S. Durkin, S. Muchimapura, T. L. Parker, and C. A. Marsden, “Central noradrenergic depletion in isolated rats enhances retention but not acquisition in the water maze,” Behav. Pharmacol (Suppl.), No. 10, S55 (1999). · DOI
  59. M. D. S. Lapiz, Y. Mateo, and C. A. Marsden, “Effects of noradrenaline depletion in the brain on response to novelty in isolation reared rats,” Psychopharmacology (submitted) (2000). · DOI
  60. M. D. S. Lapiz, Y. Mateo, T. L. Parker, and C. A. Marsden, “Noradrenergic involvement in the exploratory behavior of isolation reared rats,” Br. J. Pharmacol. (Suppl.), No. 63 (in press) (2000).
  61. M. D. S. Lapiz, T. L. Parker, and C. A. Marsden, “Effects of acute and subchronic phencyclidine administration on the locomotor behavior of isolation-reared rats,” J. Psychopharmacol. (Suppl. A), No. 13, A12 (1999).
  62. M. D. S. Lapiz, T. L. Parker, and C. A. Marsden, “Social isolation affects response to novelty and to d-amphetamine,” Proc. Aust. Neurosci. Soc., No. 10, 200 (1999).
  63. L. J. Martin, D. M. Spicer, M. H. Lewis, J. P. Gluck, and L. C. Cork, “Social deprivation in infact rhesus monkeys alters the chemoarchitecture of the brain: I. Subcortical regions,” J Neurosci., No. 11, 3344–3358 (1991). · DOI
  64. E. Masliah, R. D. Terry, M. Alford, and R. DeTeresa, “Quantitative immunohistochemistry of synaptophysin in human neocortex: an alternative method to estimate density of presynaptic terminals in paraffin sections,” J. Histochem. Cytochem., No. 38, 837–844 (1990). · DOI
  65. W. A. Mason, R. K. Davenport, and E. W. Menzel, “Early experience and the social development of rhesus monkeys and chimpanzees,” in: Newton G., Levine S. (eds.), Early Experience and Behavior, Thomas, Springfield, Illinois (1968).
  66. M. J. Morgan, “Effects of post-weaning environment on learning in the rat,” Anim. Behav., No. 21, 429–442 (1973). · DOI
  67. M. Morgan and D. Einon, “Incentive motivation and behavioral inhibition in socially-isolated rats,” Physiol. Behav., No. 15, 405–409 (1975). · DOI
  68. A. Morinan and V. Parker, “Are socially isolated rats anxious?” Br. J. Pharmacol., No. 86, 460 (1986).
  69. J. H. Morrison, P. R. Hof, W. Janssen, J. L. Bassett, S. L. Foote, G. W. Kraemer, and W. T. McKinney, “Quantitative neuroanatomic analyses of cerebral cortex in rhesus monkey from different rearing conditions,” Proc. Soc. Neurosci., No. 16, 789, P12 (1990).
  70. S. Muchimapura, R. Mason, and C. A. Marsden, “Effect of social isolation on hippocampal 5-HT1A receptor activity in the Lister Hooded rat,” Br. J. Pharmacol (Suppl.), No. 128, 203 (1999).
  71. J. C. Neill and B. Costall, “The effect of isolation rearing on ethanol and saccharin preference in the rat,” J. Psychopharmacology (Suppl.), No. 10(3), A10 (1996).
  72. M. G. Packard, L. Cahill, and J. L. McGaugh, “Amydala modulation of hippocampal-dependent and caudate nucleus-dependent memory processes,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, No. 91, 8477–8481 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
  73. G. D. Phillips, S. R. Howes, R. B. Whitelaw, L. S. Wilkinson, and T. W. Robbins, “Isolation rearing enhances the locomotor response to cocaine and a novel environment, but impairs the intravenous administration of cocaine,” Psychopharmacology, No. 115, 407–418 (1994) · DOI
  74. G. P. Sackett, “Prospects for research on schizophrenia. 3. Neurophysiology. Isolation rearing in primates,” Neurosci. Res. Prog. Byull., No. 10, 388–390 (1972).
  75. B. J. Sahakian and T. W. Robbins, “Isolation-rearing enhances tail pinch-induced oral behavior in rats,” Physiol. Behav., No. 18, 53–58 (1977). · DOI
  76. B. J. Sahakian, T. W. Robbins, and S. D. Iversen, “The effects of isolation rearing on exploration in the rat,” Anim. Learn. Behav., No. 5, 193–198 (1977). · DOI
  77. B. J. Sahakian, T. W. Robbins, M. J. Morgan, and S. D. Iversen, “The effects of psychomotor stimulants on stereotypy and locomotor activity in socially-deprived and control rats,” Brain Res., No. 84, 195–205 (1975). · DOI
  78. P. F. D. Seitz, “Infantile experience and adult behavior in animal subjects. II. Age of separation from the mother and adult behavour in the cat,” Psychosom. Med., No. 21, 353–378 (1959). · DOI
  79. B. V. J. Siegel, M. S. Buchsbaum, W. E. J. Bunney, L. A. Gottschalk, R. J. Haier, J. B. Lohr, S. Lottenberg, A. Najafi, K. H. Neuchterlein, S. G. Potkin, and J. C. Wu, “Cortico-striatal thalamic circuits and brain glucose metabolic activity in 70 unmedicated male schizophrenic patients,” Am. J. Psychiatry, No. 150, 1325–1336 (1993). · DOI
  80. A. M. Sirevaag and W. T. Greenough, “Differential rearing effects on rat visual cortex synapses. III. Neuronal and glial nuclei, buotons, dendrites, and capillaries,” Brain Res., No. 424, 320–332 (1987). · DOI
  81. J. K. Smith, J. C. Neill, and B. Costall, “Post-weaning housing conditions influence the behavioral effects of cocaine and d-amphetamine,” Psychopharmacology, No. 131, 23–33 (1997). · DOI
  82. S. C. Stanford, V. Parker, and A. Morinan, “Deficits in exploratory behavior in socially-isolated rats are not accompanied by changes in cerebral cortical adrenoceptor binding,” J. Aff. Dis., No. 15, 175–180 (1988). · DOI
  83. N. R. Swerdlow, S. B. Caine, D. L. Braff, and M. A. Geyer, “The neural substrates of sensorimotor gating of the startle reflex: a review of recent findings and their implications,” J. Psychopharmacol., No. 6, 176–190 (1992). · DOI
  84. L. A. Syme, “Social isolation at weaning, some effects on two measures of activity,” Anim. Learn. Behav., No. 1, 161–163 (1973). · DOI
  85. N. B. Thoa, Y. Tizabi, and D. M. Jacobowitz, “The effect of prolonged isolation on the catecholamine and serotonin concentrations of discrete areas of the rat brain,” in: E. Usdin, R. Kvetnansky, and I. J. Kopin (eds.), Catecholamines and Stress, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1976) pp.61–66. · DOI
  86. N. B. Thoa, Y. Tizabi, and D. M. Jacobowitz, “The effects of isolation on catecholamine concentration and turnover in discrete areas of the rat brain,” Brain Res., No. 131, 259–269 (1977). · DOI
  87. L. Valzelli, “The isolation syndrome in mice,” Psychopharmacology, No. 31, 305–320 (1973). · DOI
  88. G. B. Varty, C. A. Marsden, and G. A. Higgins, “Reduced synaptophysin immunoreactivity in the dentate gyrus of prepulse inhibition-impaired isolation-reared rats,” Brain Res., No. 824, 197–203 (1999). · DOI
  89. F. R. Volkmar and W. T. Greenough, “Rearing complexity affects branching of dendrites in the visual cortical synapses of rats: preliminary results,” Behav. Biol., No. 7, 279–284 (1972). · DOI
  90. I. C. Weiss, J. Feldon, and A. M. Domeney, “Isolation rearing-induced disruption of prepulse inhibition: Further evidence for fragility of the response,” Behav. Pharmacol., No. 10, 139–149 (1999). · DOI
  91. L. S. Wilkinson, S. S. Killcross, T. Humby, F. S. Hall, M. A. Geyer, and T. W. Robbins, “Social isolation in the rat produces developmentally specific deficits in prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response without disrupting latent inhibition,” Neuropsychopharmacology, No. 10, 63–72 (1994). · DOI
  92. B. E. Will, M. R. Rosenzweig, and E. L. Bennett, “Effects of differential environments on recovery from neonatal brain lesions, measured by problem-solving scores and brain dimensions,” Physiol. Behav., No. 16, 603–611 (1976). · DOI
  93. P. Willner, “The validity of animal models of depression,” Psychopharmacology, No. 83, 1–16 (1984). · DOI
  94. C. A. Wilmot, C. VanderWende, and M. T. Spoerlein, “Behavioral and biochemical studies of dopamine receptor sensitivity in differentially housed mice,” Psychopharmacology, No. 89, 364–369 (1986). · DOI
  95. N. Wongwitdecha and C. A. Marsden, “Effect of social isolation on the reinforcing properties of morphine in the conditioned place preference test,” Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., No. 53, 531–534 (1996). · DOI
  96. N. Wongwitdecha and C. A. Marsden, “Effects of social isolation on learning in the Morris water maze,” Brain Res., No. 715, 119–124 (1996). · DOI
  97. N. Wongwitdecha and C. A. Marsden, “Social isolation increases aggressive behavior and alters the effects of diazepam in the rat social interaction test,” Behav. Brain Res., No. 75, 27–32 (1996). · DOI
  98. P. J. Woods, A. S. Fiske, and S. I. Ruckelshaus, “The effects of drives conflicting with exploration on the problem solving behavior of rats reared in free and restricted environments,” J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., No. 54, 167–169 (1961). · DOI
  99. I. K. Wright, H. Ismail, N. Upton, and C. A. Marsden, “Resocialization of isolation-reared rats do not alter their anxiogenic profile in the elevated X-maze model of anxiety,” Physiol. Behav., No. 50, 1129–1132 (1991). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lapiz, M. D. S., Fulford, A., Muchimapura, S., Mason, R., Parker, T., & Marsden, C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of the West of England (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2003-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
13-29
ISSN
  • 0097-0549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-899X
DOI
10.1023/a:1021171129766
OpenAlex
W9766445
Cited by
305
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
isolation rearing, brain development, hippocampal dysfunction, amphetamine response, conditioned behavior, dopamine, serotonin, norepinephrine, nucleus accumbens, amygdala, frontal cortex, mesolimbic system, schizophrenia, depression, early life environment, neuropsychiatric disorders
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Catecholamines, Conditioning, Psychological, Humans, Synaptic Transmission, Serotonin, Social Isolation, Stress, Psychological, Weaning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review