Cited by 89Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchStress Responses and CortisolNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Social isolation and chronic handling alter endocannabinoid signaling and behavioral reactivity to context in adult rats

Open access
Sciolino, N.R., Bortolato, M., Eisenstein, S.A., Fu, J., Oveisi, F., Hohmann, A.G., Piomelli, D.·2010·Neuroscience

Abstract

Social deprivation in early life disrupts emotionality and attentional processes in humans. Rearing rats in isolation reproduces some of these abnormalities, which are attenuated by daily handling. However, the neurochemical mechanisms underlying these responses remain poorly understood. We hypothesized that post-weaning social isolation alters the endocannabinoid system, a neuromodulatory system that controls emotional responding. We characterized behavioral consequences of social isolation and evaluated whether handling would reverse social isolation-induced alterations in behavioral reactivity to context and the endocannabinoid system. At weaning, pups were single or group housed and concomitantly handled or not handled daily until adulthood. Rats were tested in emotionality- and attentional-sensitive behavioral assays (open field, elevated plus maze, startle and prepulse inhibition). Cannabinoid receptor densities and endocannabinoid levels were quantified in a separate group of rats. Social isolation negatively altered behavioral responding. Socially-isolated rats that were handled showed less deficits in the open field, elevated plus maze, and prepulse inhibition tests. Social isolation produced site-specific alterations (supraoptic nucleus, ventrolateral thalamus, rostral striatum) in cannabinoid receptor densities compared to group rearing. Handling altered the endocannabinoid system in neural circuitry controlling emotional expression. Handling altered endocannabinoid content (prefrontal and piriform cortices, nucleus accumbens) and cannabinoid receptor densities (lateral globus pallidus, cingulate and piriform cortices, hippocampus) in a region-specific manner. Some effects of social isolation on the endocannabinoid system were moderated by handling. Isolates were unresponsive to handling-induced increases in cannabinoid receptor densities (caudal striatum, anterior thalamus), but were sensitive to handling-induced changes in endocannabinoid content (piriform, prefrontal cortices), compared to group-reared rats. Our findings suggest alterations in the endocannabinoid system may contribute to the abnormal isolate phenotype. Handling modifies the endocannabinoid system and behavioral reactivity to context, but surmounts only some effects of social isolation. These data implicate a pivotal role for the endocannabinoid system in stress adaptation and emotionality-related disturbances.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.04.007

Cites

129 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Martin JH Foltin J 2003 The limbic system and cerebral circuits for emotions, learning, and memory Neuroanatomy: textbook and atlas 377 406 New York McGraw-Hill Companies

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sciolino, N. R., Bortolato, M., Eisenstein, S. A., Fu, J., Oveisi, F., Hohmann, A. G., & Piomelli, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hohmann, A.G.
  • Piomelli, D.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
168
Issue
2
Pages
371-386
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985496935
Cited by
89
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA021644S1, R01DA021644, R21DA022702)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
social isolation, endocannabinoid system, cannabinoid receptors, emotionality, attention, prepulse inhibition, startle response, elevated plus maze, open field, stress adaptation, piriform cortex, prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, supraoptic nucleus, ventrolateral thalamic nucleus, cingulate cortex, hippocampus, globus pallidus
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Emotions, Female, Handling, Psychological, Male, Social Isolation, Reflex, Startle, Signal Transduction, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Maze Learning, Receptors, Cannabinoid, Rats, Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators, Endocannabinoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review