Cited by 159Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selective Inhibition in Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Off and On Stimulant Medication

Bedard, Anne-Claude, Ickowicz, Abel, Logan, Gordon D., Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah, Schachar, Russell, Tannock, Rosemary·2003·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Selective inhibition requires discrimination between auditory signals and is assessed using a modification of the stop-signal task. Selective inhibition was assessed in a group of 59 clinic-referred, DSM-IV-diagnosed children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and compared to that of a community sample of 59 children. Methylphenidate (MPH) effects on selective inhibition were assessed in a subset of the ADHD sample that participated in an acute, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial with 3 fixed doses of MPH. Children with ADHD performed more poorly than controls on the majority of selective stop-signal task parameters: they exhibited more anticipatory (invalid) responses, with less accurate and more variable responses on the response execution task, as well as a slower selective inhibition process. MPH improved speed of both inhibition and response execution processes; it also reduced variability of response execution and decreased nonselective inhibition. On the one hand, findings are consistent with purported inhibition deficit in ADHD, but on the other hand, suggest that neither the impairment itself, nor MPH effects, were restricted to inhibition.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1023285614844

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MPH reduces ADHD symptoms and has been found to increase inhibition abilities in children with ADHD.

    “MPH reduces ADHD symptoms (Jensen et al., 2001) and has been found to increase inhibition abilities in children with ADHD (Bedard et al., 2003).”

    From Implementation Intentions Facilitate Response Inhibition in Children with ADHD (2008) · cites this paper as Bedard et al., 2003

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994), Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  2. Bedard, A.-C., Nichols, S., Barbosa, J. A., Schachar, R., Logan, G. D., & Tannock, R. (2002). Development of selective inhibitory control across the life-span. Developmental Neuropsychology, 21, 93-111. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Conners, C. K. (1997). Conners' Rating Scales—Revised: Technical Manual. New York: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.
  4. De Jong, R. (1991). Partial information or facilitation? Different interpretations of results from speed-accuracy decomposition. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 333-350. · DOI
  5. De Jong, R., Coles, M. G., & Logan, G. D. (1995). Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 498-511.
  6. Douglas, V. I. (1999). Cognitive control processes in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. In H. C. Quay & A. E. Hogan (Eds.), Handbook of disruptive behavior disorders (pp. 105-138). New York: Plenum. · DOI
  7. Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., & Lyon, G. R. (1998). Intelligent testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 186-203.
  8. Greenhill, L. L., Pliszka, S., Dulcan, M. K., Bernet, W., Arnold, V., Beitchman, J. et al. (2002). Practice parameter for the use of stimulant medications in the treatment of children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 26S-49S. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Kuntsi, J., Oosterlaan, J., & Stevenson, J. (2001). Psychological mechanisms in hyperactivity: I. Response inhibition deficit, working memory impairment, delay aversion, or something else? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 199-210. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Logan, G. D. (1985). On the ability to inhibit simple thoughts and actions: 2. Stop-signal studies of repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 675-691.
  11. Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users' guide to the stop-signal paradigm. In D. D. Carr & T. H. Carr (Eds.). Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189-239). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  12. Logan, G. D., Schachar, R. J., & Tannock, R. (1997). Impulsivity and inhibition. Psychological Science, 8, 60-64. · DOI
  13. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Diagnosis and Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). (2000). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 182-193. · DOI
  14. Nigg, J. T. (1999). The ADHD response-inhibition deficit as measured by the stop-signal task: Replication with DSM-IV combined type, extension, and qualification. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 393-402. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Nigg, J. T., Blaskey, L. G., Huang-Pollock, C. L., & Rappley, M. D. (2002). Neuropsychological executive functions and DSM-IV ADHD subtypes. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 59-66. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Oosterlaan, J., Logan, G. D., & Sergeant, J. A. (1998). Response inhibition in AD/HD, CD, comorbid AD/HD + CD, anxious, and control children: A meta-analysis of studies with the stop-signal task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 411-425.
  17. Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (1998). Response inhibition and response re-engagement in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, disruptive, anxious and normal children. Behavioral Brain Research, 94, 33-43. · DOI
  18. Osman, A., Kornblum, S., & Meyer, D. E. (1990). Does response programming necessitate response execution? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 183-198.
  19. Purvis, K. L., & Tannock, R. (2000). Phonological processing, not inhibition, differentiates ADHD and reading disability. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 485-494. · DOI
  20. Quay, H. C. (1997). Inhibition and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25, 7-13. · DOI
  21. Rapport, M. D., & Denney, C. (1997). Titrating methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Is body mass predictive of clinical response? Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 523-530. · DOI
  22. Schachar, R., & Logan, G. D. (1990). Impulsivity and inhibition in normal development and childhood psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 26, 710-720. · DOI
  23. Schachar, R., Mota, V. L., Logan, G. D., Tannock, R., & Klim, P. (2000). Confirmation of an inhibition deficit in attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 227-235. · DOI
  24. Schachar, R., Tannock, R., & Cunningham, C. (1996). Treatment of hyperactive disorders. In S. Sandberg (Ed.), Hyperactive disorders (pp. 433-477). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Monographs in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology.
  25. Schachar, R., Tannock, R., & Logan, G. D. (1993). Inhibition, impulsiveness, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 721-739. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Schachar, R., Tannock, R., Marriott, M., & Logan, G. (1995). Deficient inhibition in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23, 411-437. · DOI
  27. Scheres, A., Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (2001). Response execution and inhibition in children with AD/HD and other disruptive disorders: The role of behavioral activation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 347-357. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., Holahan, J. M., & Shaywitz, S. E. (1992). Discrepancy compared to low achievement definitions of reading disability: results from the Connecticut Longitudinal Study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 639-648. · DOI
  29. Tannock, R. (1998). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Advances in cognitive, neurobiological, and genetic research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 65-99. · DOI
  30. Tannock, R., Hum, M., Masellis, M., Humphries, T., & Schachar, R. (2002). Teacher Telephone Interview for children's academic performance, attention, behavior, and learning: DSM-IV Version (TTI-IV). Toronto, Canada: The Hospital for Sick Children. Unpublished document.
  31. Tannock, R., Schachar, R. J., Carr, R. P., Chajczyk, D., & Logan, G. D. (1989). Effects of methylphenidate on inhibition in hyperactive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17, 473-491. · DOI
  32. Tannock, R., Schachar, R., & Logan, G. D. (1995). Methylphenidate and cognitive flexibility: Dissociated dose effects on behavior and cognition in hyperactive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23, 235-266. · DOI
  33. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children—Third Edition. New York: Psychological Corporation.
  34. Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). The Wide Range Achievement Test—Third Edition (WRAT3). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  35. Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test–Revised (WRMT-R). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bedard, A.-C., Ickowicz, A., Logan, G. D., Hogg-Johnson, S., Schachar, R., & Tannock, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Tannock, Rosemary
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2003-06
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
315-327
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W61740737
Cited by
159
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r01hd031714-01a2)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD31714)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, selective inhibition, stop-signal task, methylphenidate, stimulant medication, response inhibition, response execution, response variability, children
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Discrimination, Psychological, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Methylphenidate, Psychopathology, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review