Cited by 43Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Reinforcement and stimulant medication ameliorate deficient response inhibition in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Open access
Rosch, Keri S., Fosco, Whitney D., Pelham, William E., Waxmonsky, James G., Bubnik, Michelle G., Hawk, Larry W.·2016·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

This study examined the degree to which reinforcement, stimulant medication, and their combination impact response inhibition in children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Across three studies, participants with ADHD (n = 111, 25 girls) and typically-developing (TD) controls (n = 33, 6 girls) completed a standard version of the stop signal task (SST) and/or a reinforcement-manipulation SST with performance-contingent points. In two of these studies, these tasks were performed under placebo or 0.3 and 0.6 mg/kg methylphenidate (MPH) conditions. Cross-study comparisons were conducted to test hypotheses regarding the separate and combined effects of reinforcement and methylphenidate on response inhibition among children with ADHD relative to TD controls. Baseline response inhibition was worse among children with ADHD compared to controls. MPH produced dose-related improvements in response inhibition in children with ADHD; compared to non-medicated TD controls, 0.3 mg/kg MPH normalized deficient response inhibition, and 0.6 mg/kg MPH resulted in better inhibition in children with ADHD. Reinforcement improved response inhibition to a greater extent for children with ADHD than for TD children, normalizing response inhibition. The combination of MPH and reinforcement improved response inhibition among children with ADHD compared to reinforcement alone and MPH alone, also resulting in normalization of response inhibition despite repeated task exposure. Deficient response inhibition commonly observed in children with ADHD is significantly improved with MPH and/or reinforcement, normalizing inhibition relative to TD children tested under standard conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-015-0031-x

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wechsler DL Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) 2003 The Psychological Corporation San Antonio, TX

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosch, K. S., Fosco, W. D., Pelham, W. E., Waxmonsky, J. G., Bubnik, M. G., & Hawk, L. W.
Affiliations
  • Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Florida International University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Rosch, Keri S.
  • Hawk, Larry W.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2015-05-20
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
309-321
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W307359510
Cited by
43
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute
  • Institute of Education Sciences
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA011873, AA 11873, R37AA011873, R56AA011873)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH65899, R01MH069434, MH062946, MH62946, R01MH062946, MH 69434, R34MH078051, R01MH065899, MH069614, R01MH053554, R34MH080791, MH080791, MH 78051, R01MH069614, K23MH101322, MH-53554)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA12414, R01DA012414)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-39087, R01NS039087)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, response inhibition, reinforcement, methylphenidate, stimulant medication, stop-signal task, children, dose-response relationship, combination therapy, inhibitory control
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Methylphenidate, Reinforcement, Psychology, Treatment Outcome, Delay Discounting, Prepulse Inhibition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review