Cited by 81Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchStress Responses and Cortisol

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fear-potentiated startle and posttraumatic stress symptoms in urban police officers

Abstract

We studied the effects of increasing threat conditions on self‐reported emotion, eyeblink electromyogram, and skin conductance responses to startling sounds in 55 police officers who endorsed a range of PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder) symptoms. We found that contextual threat affected both physiologic and self‐reported emotional responses. Greater PTSD symptom severity was related to greater physiologic responses under the low and medium but not under the high threat condition. The relationship between PTSD symptoms and physiologic responses was neither explained by self‐reported emotional responses nor preexisting reported exaggerated startle symptoms. Our results emphasize the importance of contextual threat and suggest that laboratory measures of startle improve upon self‐reported exaggerated startle alone in indexing PTSD symptom severity in urban police officers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1025758411370

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fear-potentiated startle can be dysregulated in PTSD.

    “Studies in PTSD have shown that fear-potentiated startle can be dysregulated in PTSD (Jovanovic et al., 2010;Pole et al., 2003)”

    From Physiological feelings (2019) · cites this paper as Pole et al., 2003

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Blake D. D., 1997, Clinician administered PTSD scale (CAPS)
  2. 10.1037/0021-843X.108.2.347 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0021-843X.104.1.75 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pole, N., Neylan, T. C., Best, S. R., Orr, S. P., & Marmar, C. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Pole, Nnamdi
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
471-479
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W2133212283
Cited by
79
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH056350, R01 MH56350-03)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
fear-potentiated startle, post-traumatic stress disorder, police officers, skin conductance, self-reported emotion, PTSD symptom severity, occupational injuries
MeSH terms
Adult, Blinking, Electromyography, Emotions, Fear, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Reflex, Startle, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Urban Population, Reproducibility of Results, Police

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review