Cited by 211Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Do Executive Function Deficits Differentiate Between Adolescents with ADHD and Oppositional Defiant/Conduct Disorder? A Neuropsychological Study Using the Six Elements Test and Hayling Sentence Completion Test

Clark, Cheryl, Prior, Margot, Kinsella, Glynda J.·2000·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Two neuropsychological measures of executive functions--Six Elements Tests (SET) and Hayling Sentence Completion Test (HSCT)--were administered to 110 adolescents, aged 12-15 years. Participants comprised four groups: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) only (n = 35). ADHD and Oppositional Defiant Disorder/Conduct Disorder (ODD/CD) (n = 38), ODD/CD only (n = 11), and a normal community control group (n = 26). Results indicated that adolescents with ADHD performed significantly worse on both the SET and HSCT than those without ADHD, whether or not they also had ODD/CD. The adolescents with ADHD and with comorbid ADHD and ODD/CD were significantly more impaired in their ability to generate strategies and to monitor their ongoing behavior compared with age-matched controls and adolescents with ODD/CD only. It is argued that among adolescents with clinically significant levels of externalizing behavior problems, executive function deficits are specific to those with ADHD. The findings support the sensitivity of these two relatively new tests of executive functions and their ecological validity in tapping into everyday situations, which are potentially problematic for individuals with ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1005176320912

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children with ADHD tend to show impaired planning abilities that can be restored with MPH.

    “This observation is in line with previous research demonstrating that children with ADHD tend to show impaired planning abilities (e.g., Clarke, Prior, & Kinsella, 2000) that can be restored with MPH (e.g., Arnsten & Dudley, 2005).”

    From Implementation Intentions Facilitate Response Inhibition in Children with ADHD (2008) · cites this paper as Clarke, Prior, & Kinsella, 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, C., Prior, M., & Kinsella, G. J.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2000-10
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
403-414
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W82962252
Cited by
211
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
executive dysfunction, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, comorbidities, adolescents, strategy generation, self-monitoring, externalizing problems, neuropsychological assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cognition, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Case-Control Studies, Conduct Disorder, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review