Cited by 198Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Preadolescent girls with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: II. Neuropsychological performance in relation to subtypes and individual classification.

Hinshaw, Stephen P., Carte, Estol T., Sami, Nilofar, Treuting, Jennifer J., Zupan, Brian A.·2002·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

This study examined executive functions, motor speed, and language processing in a diverse, preadolescent sample of 93 girls with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) combined type, 47 ADHD inattentive type, and 88 age- and ethnicity-matched comparison girls. Testing was performed without stimulant medication. All 10 neuropsychological variables showed significant omnibus subgroup differences, with 8 of 10 combined versus comparison contrasts significant (average effect size medium) and 6 of 10 inattentive versus comparison contrasts significant (average effect size small to medium), but only 2 of 10 combined versus inattentive contrasts significant (average effect size small). Results were robust to statistical control of demographic variables, comorbidities, and IQ. Discriminant function analysis revealed relatively high sensitivity but only modest specificity in predicting ADHD from comparison status from test performance; classification of the inattentive type was extremely poor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.70.5.1099

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is critical to include motor control in studies related to processing speed due to their common overlapping deficit.

    “It is critical to include motor control in studies related to processing speed due to their common overlapping deficit30,31,47,55,61,81.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hinshaw, S. P., Carte, E. T., Sami, N., Treuting, J. J., & Zupan, B. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Minnesota Department of Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2002
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
1099-1111
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2102431974
Cited by
198
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH 45064, R01MH045064)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, preadolescent girls, ADHD subtypes, combined type ADHD, inattentive type ADHD, executive function, motor speed, language processing, neuropsychological performance, discriminant function analysis
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Female, Humans, Individuality, Learning Disabilities, Neuropsychological Tests, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, San Francisco, Urban Population, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review