Cited by 418Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reading the Mind in the Voice: A Study with Normal Adults and Adults with Asperger Syndrome and High Functioning Autism

Rutherford, M. D., Baron-Cohen, Simon, Wheelwright, Sally·2002·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

People with high functioning autism (HFA) and Asperger syndrome (AS) have deficits in theory of mind (ToM). Traditional ToM tasks are not sensitive enough to measure ToM deficits in adults, so more subtle ToM tests are needed. One adult level test, the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test has shown that AS and HFA subjects have measurable deficits in the ability to make ToM inferences. Here we introduce a test that extends the above task into the auditory domain and that can be used with adults with IQ Scores in the normal range. We report the use of the test with an adult sample of people with AS/HFA and with two adult control groups. Results suggest that individuals with AS/HFA have difficulty extracting mental state information from vocalizations. These results are consistent with previous results suggesting that people with HFA and AS have difficulties drawing ToM inferences.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1015497629971

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 33 references

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (In press). The Autism-Spectrum Quotient: A new instrument for screening for Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism in adults of normal intelligence. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
  2. World Health Organization (1994). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 418

Metadata

Authors
Rutherford, M. D., Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Rutherford, M. D.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2002-06
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
189-194
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2134409536
Cited by
411
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • US-UK Fulbright Commission
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32mh015780-21)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (2 T32 MH15780-20)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
theory of mind, Asperger syndrome, high-functioning autism, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, voice perception, autistic adults, social cognition deficits
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Concept Formation, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Social Perception, Speech Acoustics, Speech Perception, Asperger Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review