Cited by 541EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesMagnetic Field Sensors TechniquesAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Suppression of Interference and Artifacts by the Signal Space Separation Method

Taulu, Samu, Kajola, Matti, Simola, Juha·2004·Brain Topography

Abstract

Multichannel measurement with hundreds of channels oversamples a curl-free vector field, like the magnetic field in a volume free of sources. This is based on the constraint caused by the Laplace's equation for the magnetic scalar potential; outside of the source volume the signals are spatially band limited. A functional solution of Laplace's equation enables one to separate the signals arising from the sphere enclosing the interesting sources, e.g. the currents in the brain, from the magnetic interference. Signal space separation (SSS) is accomplished by calculating individual basis vectors for each term of the functional expansion to create a signal basis covering all measurable signal vectors. Because the SSS basis is linearly independent for all practical sensor arrangements, any signal vector has a unique SSS decomposition with separate coefficients for the interesting signals and signals coming from outside the interesting volume. Thus, SSS basis provides an elegant method to remove external disturbances. The device-independent SSS coefficients can be used in transforming the interesting signals to virtual sensor configurations. This can also be used in compensating for distortions caused by movement of the object by modeling it as movement of the sensor array around a static object. The device-independence of the decomposition also enables physiological DC phenomena to be recorded using voluntary head movements. When used with properly designed sensor array, SSS does…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:brat.0000032864.93890.f9

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Uusitalo, M.A. and Ilmoniemi, R.J. Signal-space projection method. Med. Biol. Eng., 1997, 32: 35–42.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Taulu, S., Kajola, M., & Simola, J.
Venue
Brain Topography
Published
2004-06
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
269-275
ISSN
  • 0896-0267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6792
OpenAlex
W2060366056
Cited by
541
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 21
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Topography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Keywords
magnetic field measurement, interference suppression, artifact removal, Laplace equation, functional expansion, multi-channel measurement, head movement, signal-to-noise ratio
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Electromagnetic Fields, Humans, Models, Neurological, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, Magnetoencephalography, Artifacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review