CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 665Organizational Change and LeadershipJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorOrganizational Management and Change

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Uncertainty During Organizational Change: Types, Consequences, and Management Strategies

Bordia, Prashant, Hobman, Elizabeth, Jones, Elizabeth, Gallois, Cindy, Callan, Victor J.·2004·Journal of Business and Psychology
DOI 10.1023/b:jobu.0000028449.99127.f7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:jobu.0000028449.99127.f7

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Caplan, R. D., Cobb, S., French, J. R. P., Harrison, R. V., & Pinneau, S. R. (1980). Job demands and worker health. Ann Arbor: MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
  2. Clampitt, P. G., DeKoch, R. J., & Williams, M. L. (2002). Embracing uncertaint:. The hidden dimension of growth. Ivey Business Journal, 66(3), 57-67.
  3. Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The detection of psychiatric illnesses by questionnaire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Jackson, S., Schuler, R., & Vredenburgh, D. (1987). Managing stress in turbulent times. In A. Riley, & S. Zaccaro, (Eds.). Occupational stress and organizational effectiveness (pp. 141-166). New York: Praeger.
  5. Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  6. Watson, B., Jones, E., Hobman, E., Bordia, P., Gallois, C., & Callan, V. J. (2002). Employee perceptions of organizational change. Manuscript under review.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 665

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bordia, P., Hobman, E., Jones, E., Gallois, C., & Callan, V. J.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Bordia, Prashant
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Business and Psychology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2004-06
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
507-532
ISSN
  • 0889-3268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-353X
DOI
10.1023/b:jobu.0000028449.99127.f7
OpenAlex
W2032692513
Cited by
665
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 33
FWCI
22.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Business and Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
Keywords
organizational change, strategic uncertainty, structural uncertainty, psychological strain, perceived control, management communication, employee participation, public sector organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review