Cited by 790Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cyberbullying Versus Face-to-Face Bullying: A Theoretical and Conceptual Review

Open access
Dooley, Julian J., Pyżalski, Jacek, Cross, Donna·2009·Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Cyberbullying has been described as a type of electronic bullying and has recently been subjected to intense media scrutiny largely due to a number of high profile and tragic cases of teen suicide. Despite the media attention relatively little is known about the nature of cyberbullying. This is, at least in part, due to a lack of theoretical and conceptual clarity and an examination of the similarities and differences between cyberbullying and face-to-face bullying. This paper reviews the limited theoretical and empirical literature addressing both cyberbullying and face-to-face bullying, using some specific examples from a qualitative study for illustration. We compare and contrast individual factors common to cyber and face-to-face bullying. We then examine social information processing factors associated with face-to-face bullying and present a discussion of the similarities and differences that may characterize cyberbullying.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.182

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Blair J., 2003, Education Week, 22, 6
  2. Salmivalli C., 2001, Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized, 398
  3. Wolak J., 2006, Online victimization: 5 years later

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 788

Metadata

Authors
Dooley, J. J., Pyżalski, J., & Cross, D.
Affiliations
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine (PL)
Venue
Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology
Published
2009-01
Volume
217
Issue
4
Pages
182-188
ISSN
0044-3409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1862769446
Cited by
790
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 106 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 57
FWCI
36.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Zeitschrift für Psychologie (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying, face-to-face bullying, adolescent suicide, social information processing, conceptual clarity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review