Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next.
Abstract
In this article, 2 experiments are presented. In both experiments, the independent variables were whether the procedure was accurate or inaccurate, whether the outcome was favorable or unfavorable, and whether participants were informed about the procedure before or after they were informed about the outcome. The independent variables were manipulated by means of scenarios in Experiment 1 and by means of the R. Vermunt, A.P. Wit, K. van den Bos, and E.A. Lind (1996) paradigm in Experiment 2. As predicted on the basis of the authors' analysis of fairness heuristic theory, the findings revealed that what people judge to be fair is more strongly affected by information that is received first than by subsequently received information. The findings are discussed in terms of recent developments toward an integration of the procedural and distributive justice domains.
Cites (5)
- Inequity In Social ExchangeAdams, J. Stacy · 1965 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- The Elaboration Likelihood Model of PersuasionPetty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T. · 1986 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- The Social Psychology of Procedural JusticeLind, E. Allan, Tyler, Tom R. · 1988 · Critical Issues in Social Justice
- A Relational Model of Authority in GroupsTyler, Tom R., Lind, E. Allan · 1992 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Distributional and Procedural Aspects of Satisfaction With Citizen-Police EncountersTyler, Tom R., Folger, Robert · 1980 · Basic and Applied Social Psychology
Cited by (16)
- Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.Colquitt, Jason A., Conlon, Donald E., Wesson, Michael J., Porter, Christopher O. L. H., Ng, K. Yee · 2001 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trustSparks, Beverley A., Browning, Victoria · 2011 · Tourism Management
- Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives.Colquitt, Jason A., Scott, Brent A., Rodell, Jessica B., Long, David M., Zapata, Cindy P., Conlon, Donald E., Wesson, Michael J. · 2013 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgmentsvan den Bos, Kees, Lind, E. Allan · 2002 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Experimental Research on Just-World Theory: Problems, Developments, and Future Challenges.Hafer, Carolyn L., Bègue, Laurent · 2005 · Psychological Bulletin
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.72.1.95
- The paper
- van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.72.1.95
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.