Cited by 5,806Identity, Memory, and TherapyPersonality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Possible selves.

Markus, Hazel, Nurius, Paula·1986·American Psychologist

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.41.9.954

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 1,026

Metadata

Authors
Markus, H., & Nurius, P.
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1986-09
Volume
41
Issue
9
Pages
954-969
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W4249746737
Cited by
5,806
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 289 · 2025: 277 · 2024: 307 · 2023: 261 · 2022: 315 · 2021: 311 · 2020: 446 · 2019: 322 · 2018: 289 · 2017: 243 · 2016: 234 · 2015: 238 · 2014: 199 · 2013: 190 · 2012: 185
FWCI
16.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
possible selves, self-concept, self-image, self-fulfilling prophecy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review