Cited by 657Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Changes in executive control across the life span: Examination of task-switching performance.

Cepeda, Nicholas J., Kramer, Arthur F., Gonzalez de Sather, Jessica C. M.·2001·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

A study was conducted to examine changes in executive control processes over the life span. More specifically, changes in processes responsible for preparation and interference control that underlie the ability to flexibly alternate between two different tasks were examined. Individuals (N = 152) ranging in age from 7 to 82 years participated in the study. A U-shaped function was obtained for switch costs (i.e., the time required to switch between tasks compared with a repeated-task baseline), with larger costs found for young children and older adults. Switch costs were reduced with practice, particularly for children. All age groups benefited from increased preparation time, with larger benefits observed for children and older adults. Adults benefited to a greater extent than children when the interval between the response to one task and the cue indicating which task to perform next was lengthened, which suggested faster decay of interference from the old task set for adults than for children. A series of hierarchical analyses indicated that the age-related variance in task-switching performance is independent, at least in part, from the age-related variance in other cognitive processes such as perceptual speed and working memory. The results are discussed in terms of the development and decline of executive control processes across the life span.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.37.5.715

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Naatanen, 1975, Expectancy and preparation in simple reaction time., 115
  2. Paniak, 1996, Canadian developmental norms for 9- to 14-year-olds on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test., Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 9, 233
  3. 10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.89 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 657

Metadata

Authors
Cepeda, N. J., Kramer, A. F., & Gonzalez de Sather, J. C. M.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2001
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
715-730
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W1978319605
Cited by
657
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 42
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01 AG 14966, R01AG014966)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
executive function, task switching, switch costs, interference control, age differences, cognitive aging, cognitive development, practice effects, perceptual speed, working memory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review