Cited by 90Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Cybervictimization of young people with an intellectual or developmental disability: risks specific to sexual solicitation

Normand, Claude L., Sallafranque‐St‐Louis, François·2016·Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

Abstract

Background: Studies demonstrate that youth are vulnerable to online sexual solicitation. However, no study has estimated this risk for youth diagnosed with an intellectual or developmental disability ( IDD ). Methods: A literature review of the risk factors associated with online sexual solicitation in youths was done using electronic databases, such as PsychIn FO , ERIC , MEDLINE and Scopus. Results: Fifty‐seven published papers were found relevant. However, only two pertained to the population with IDD . Sexual and physical abuse, social isolation, loneliness, depression, and chatting were found to increase the risk of being prey to sexual solicitation on the Internet. Many of these risk factors are even more prevalent in youth with IDD than in the general population. Conclusion: Recommendations are made for future research to help understand and prevent sexual cybersolicitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jar.12163

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perpetrators employ various techniques, such as manipulation, cyberstalking, coercion, providing gifts to victims, cyber-threats, cyber-harassment, sexting, sextortion, grooming, and digital alteration of images.

    “In addition, the studies analyzed reveal that perpetrators employ various techniques, such as manipulation [23,27], cyberstalking [13], coercion [27], providing gifts to victims [23], cyber-threats [13,21,23,26,27], cyber-harassment [13,26], sexting [13,21], sextortion [13], grooming [4,13,19,27], and digital alteration of images [21].”
  • Specific disabilities mentioned include autism spectrum disorder, Williams Syndrome, intellectual disabilities, 22q11 deletion syndrome, and physical disabilities including deafness, and chronic health problems.

    “Specific disabilities are mentioned, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [17,26,27], Williams Syndrome [17,26], intellectual disabilities [22,26,27], 22q11 deletion syndrome (which involves developmental delays and may face mild intellectual disability or learning disabilities) [26], and physical disabilities [23,25] including deafness [18], and chronic health problems [25].”
  • Types of perpetrators based on types of offences included grooming, cyber-bullying, cyber-stalking, sextortion, or revenge porn.

    “In the case of the types of the perpetrators based on the types of offences, the following categories were identified: grooming [4,19,27], cyber-bullying [13], cyber-stalking [13], sextortion [13], or revenge porn [13].”
  • Instances of coercion were found within individuals with intellectual disabilities.

    “Instances of coercion were found within individuals with intellectual disabilities [27], which was further emphasized by reported encounters with cyber-threats, cyber-harassment, and grooming experiences associated with 22q11 deletion syndrome [26].”
  • Abusers in the reviewed studies were mainly groomers, sexual predators, cyber-bullies, cyber-stalkers, and sextortionists.

    “In addition, it was identified that abusers in the studies [3,13,19,27] were mainly groomers, sexual predators, cyber-bullies, cyber-stalkers, and sextortionists.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Normand, C. L., & Sallafranque‐St‐Louis, F.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec en Outaouais (CA)
  • Université du Québec en Outaouais Gatineau QC Canada
Corresponding author
Normand, Claude L.
Venue
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-13
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
99-110
ISSN
  • 0952-9608 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-2322
  • 1468-3148
OpenAlex
W2152815430
Cited by
90
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Consortium national de recherche sur l'intégration sociale, Quebec, Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
online sexual solicitation, cyber victimization, intellectual disability, developmental disabilities, youth, risk factors, social isolation, loneliness, depression, physical abuse, sexual abuse, online chat, prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Female, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Risk Factors, Sexual Behavior, Crime Victims, Internet, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review